Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for F3SP INSIDE 📌

Channel

F3SP INSIDE 📌

@f3sp_inside

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

628subscribers

+7 since we began measuring on 16 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003550832850
TypeChannel
Username@f3sp_inside
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded16 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/f3sp_inside

Growth

621628624.516 August 2026 — 621 subscribers17 August 2026 — 627 subscribers25 August 2026 — 628 subscribers16 August 202625 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 9 days, net +7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 620–629 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Aug 2026, 03:07628+1
17 Aug 2026, 11:56627+6
16 Aug 2026, 03:15621first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
130.6%
avg views ÷ 628 subscribers
Avg views / post
820
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.01%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 13 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held13 (2 August 202615 August 2026)
Views total10,659
Reactions total534
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken16 Aug 2026, 03:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 59s
Average length
24s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

534 reactions across 13 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
30857.7%
🥰7113.3%
💔397.30%
🔥336.18%
😭213.93%
😱163.00%
❤‍🔥91.69%
👎81.50%
💩71.31%
🆒61.12%
🤣61.12%
🍓40.749%
👍30.562%
🤔20.375%
💋10.187%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 534reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 15:37 UTC804 views26 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Video

⚡️ Фир анонсировал ТУРНИР ПО КС между участниками Фрикленда! Участники: Фир, Фывфыв, Сосиска, Ханов, Както, Пупус, Водудов, Васем, Евгеха и НикитаСа Распределение на команды будет потом, а сам турнир уже на днях 😀 #fearplay F3SP INSIDE 🔔

24👍1👎1

13 Aug 2026, 14:49 UTC842 views47 reactionsread 16 August 2026

🔥 Фир выиграл две катки из двух, забрав 5000 рублей 😀 #fearplay F3SP INSIDE 🔔

24🔥10💩7🥰3👎2❤‍🔥1

13 Aug 2026, 13:19 UTC755 views21 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Сосиска начал играть в Монополию на 5000 РУБЛЕЙ вместе с Фывфывом, Фиром и Хановым 🎁 играют тут⬇️ 😀 https://w.tv/sosiskakiller 😁 #fivfiv001 😀 #fearplay 🙂 #sosiskakiller F3SP INSIDE 🔔

16🥰5

10 Aug 2026, 14:38 UTC947 views17 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

ФЫВФЫВ начал играть в "Shift At Midnight" вместе с Фиром и Сосиской 🎁 играют тут⬇️ 🌐 https://www.twitch.tv/fivfiv001 😁 #fivfiv001 😀 #fearplay 🙂 #sosiskakiller F3SP INSIDE 🔔

12🥰5

9 Aug 2026, 16:41 UTC820 views61 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

🔥 Команда "Паханы" в которой участвовали Фывфыв, Ханов, Фир и Сосиска заняла 5 место на турнире Кубосервера! 😁 #fivfiv001 😀 #fearplay 🙂 #sosiskakiller F3SP INSIDE 🔔

36🔥16🥰8🍓1

6 Aug 2026, 15:32 UTC948 views38 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Сосиска принял участие в новом видео Фонарика Фреджа⚡️ Как Я Начал ВОЙНУ на Сервере Своей СЕСТРЫ | Полный фильм (тайминг 1:18:30) 🤓 #sosiskakiller F3SP INSIDE 🔔

29👎5🤔2🥰2

5 Aug 2026, 16:34 UTC889 views43 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Video

🔥 Фывфыв про последние события: ПРО МАФАНЮ: - Сделали откат, всё нормально. Че там обсуждать? Смотреть... ну там просто трешак. ПРО ФРЕДЖА: - Я скажу кратко: мы поговорили с ним, общались ооочень долго. Мы так не разговаривали кучу лет, прям хорошо поговорили. Ничего рассказывать не буду, захочет - сам расскажет что и как. И не надо придумывать и накручивать что самоубийство какое-то, умер кто-то, умирает и прочее. Н

🥰2615👍2

5 Aug 2026, 08:08 UTC797 views35 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Video

📌 ИТОГИ 22-ГО И 23-ГО ДНЕЙ НА FREAKLAND CREATE У РЕБЯТ 🔥 Позавчера никто из ребят не стримил и вот что произошло: прошлой ночью разгорелся жёсткий конфликт между Мафаней и Нуб-Сити: изначально Мафаня начал гриферить постройки Нуб-Сити, ставя фугасы и тнт руками. Через некоторое время Нуб-Сити ответно атаковали базу Легиона Мафани совместно с силами Кия за 3 дня и Бриксралом. Отвечая на эту атаку участники Легиона вз

26❤‍🔥4🔥3🥰2

4 Aug 2026, 18:51 UTC853 views78 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Video

☄️Сосиска про вчерашний стрим Фреджа - Уже чето не смешно, какая-то хуйня происходит - Вспомнил ситуацию с Димой когда мы ехали на машине в лес, говорит "Включи что-то грустное". И ехали, слушали только грустную музыку. Я включал только то, что он хочет. - Я готов поддержать, поговорить, выслушать. Может быть направить его. Но прям выпытывать у него что случилось я не буду, потому что когда я с ним встречался он хоте

💔3932🍓3😭2💋1🥰1

3 Aug 2026, 18:44 UTC816 views89 reactionsread 16 August 2026

Для тех кто пропустил стрим Фредж ржал 10 минут потом сказал, что у него горе и он включил на фон грустную музыку, затем он хотел поиграть в шашки, но почему-то извинился и оффнул стрим Короче говоря ахуенный стрим, 20 минут потрачены не зря 😎 #fredjgrief123 F3SP INSIDE 🔔

57😭19🤣6❤‍🔥4🥰3

3 Aug 2026, 18:21 UTC767 views25 reactionsread 16 August 2026

Фредж запустил стрим ⬇️ 🌐 https://www.twitch.tv/fredjgrief123 🤪 #fredjgrief123 F3SP INSIDE 🔔

😱16🥰9

3 Aug 2026, 04:51 UTC810 views35 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Video

📌 ИТОГИ 21-ГО ДНЯ НА FREAKLAND CREATE У РЕБЯТ 🔥 Фывфыв рассказал, что у них есть план для ответного удара на город Кия за 3 дня: он не хочет раскрывать подробности, но может сказать одно - атака будет СО ВСЕХ СТОРОН ⚠️ Вчера ночью Бриксрал ударил по территории Нуб-Сити пока никого не было на базе, сильно повредив ферму дерева. После некоторых переговоров он сказал что восстановит ферму, но отношения между ним и гор

23🆒6🔥4🥰2

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @f3sp_inside. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,207,843 of 1,627,068entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“F3SP INSIDE 📌” (@f3sp_inside), 628 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/f3sp_inside.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.