Channel
@f_x_f_f2
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
122subscribers
+6 since we began measuring on 6 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001861778673 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @f_x_f_f2 |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/f_x_f_f2 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 17:57 | 122 | +4 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 22:22 | 118 | no change |
| 9 Sept 2026, 12:17 | 118 | +2 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 16:47 | 116 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 22 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
52 reactions across 12 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 25 | 48.1% | |
| ❤🔥 | 6 | 11.5% | |
| 🕊 | 6 | 11.5% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 9.62% | |
| 💯 | 4 | 7.69% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 3.85% | |
| 💘 | 2 | 3.85% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 1.92% | |
| ✍ | 1 | 1.92% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 52 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 December 2025 to 18 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
هل تجرؤ على سؤال: "ماذا كان يوجد قبل الانفجار العظيم؟ نغوص في عقل السير روجر بينروز، العالم الحائز على نوبل. نظريته المرعبة (CCC - علم الكونيات الدوري المطابق) تقول إن كوننا ليس الأول، بل هو حلقة في سلسلة لا تنتهي من الأكوان التي تولد وتموت. في هذه الحلقة نناقش: ☄️ مشكلة الإنتروبي: لماذا لا يمكن للانفجار العظيم أن يأتي من العدم؟ ☄️ دورة حياة الكون: كيف يتحول الكون البارد الميت إلى انفجار عظيم جديد؟ ☄️ نقاط هوكينج…
❤3❤🔥1💘1💯1
لأَنَّهُ مَاذَا يَنْتَفِعُ الإِنْسَانُ لَوْ رَبِحَ الْعَالَمَ كُلَّهُ وَخَسِرَ نَفْسَهُ؟ أنجيل متى 16-26
" ان اعجز الناس من لا يستطيع ايجاد اخا له اما الاعجز منه فهو من يخسر اخا له بعد ان يكون قد وجده "
💯2✍1🕊1
شتحبون بخصوص اي موضوع نحجي عنه
The shares total 230%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
👍2❤1🕊1
كل عائلتي تعتقد بأنني لم أنم الليلة لأنني أسهر على هاتفي فقط لم تكن تعرف ما عنى أن أكون مصاب بالأرق والأفكار للحد الذي يجعل النهار غير كافٍ تفكير، فتمتد حتى طوال الليل.
❤4
تُطاردني يوميًا الأحلام التي لم أحققها والأشخاص الذين لا أستطيع تجاوزهم والأماكن التي لا يُمكنني نسيانها والأفكار التي تغلي بعقلي ولا تهدأ حتى نفسي... نفسي القديمة تُطاردني أيضًا. -
❤4
"ثقافة النمو النفسي " حبينا نتكلم عن عبء شائع بالمجتمعات البشرية ومن ضمن هذا العبء.. العلاقات العابرة ما هي أسباب الانجراف للعلاقات العابرة؟ وما هو الاستقلال والمرونة العاطفية من الجوع والإشباع العاطفي إلى النضج النفسي؟ من كتاب الحرية الفكرية أولاً، الاستقلال العاطفي هو قدرة الإنسان على تنظيم المشاعر واستمداد قيمته الذاتية وأمانه النفسي والسعادة من داخله دون الاعتماد الكلي أو الشرطي على الآخرين كالشريك أو الصديق أو …
❤🔥3💘1
File, posted without a caption
موضوع القادم
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
O my Lover, they were pitiless in their passion. They prowled in the dark to snatch thy ornaments to deck their own desires. When they had struck thee and thou wert pained, it pierced me to the quick, and I cried to thee and said, “Take thy sword, O my Lover, and judge them!” Ah, but thy justice was vigilant. A mother’s tears were shed on their insolence; the imperishable faith of a lover hid their spears of rebelli…
شرأيكم نسوي تقرير عن احد هذه الشخصيات؛
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
الفرق بين الإنسان و الحيوانات هو أن الحيوانات لن تدع أحمقًا يقود القطيع لن يتبع الذئب قائدًا ضعيفًا، ولن يطيع الأسد جباناً، على عكس البشر، يتبعون الأغبياء والتافهين و يصفقون لهم، و يجعلون من الجبناء رؤساء و قادة 🌟🌟 ."
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @f_x_f_f2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
شتحبون بخصوص اي موضوع نحجي عنه
The shares total 230%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
موضوع القادم
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
شرأيكم نسوي تقرير عن احد هذه الشخصيات؛
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
أيهما أصعب عليك؟
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
تحبون تقرير عن العلاقات على وسائل التواصل الاجتماعي
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 December 2025 to 18 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“أَلوٌآقعْ آلمکشُوفُ” (@f_x_f_f2), 122 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/f_x_f_f2.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.