Channel
@factcheckeruz
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
158subscribers
+30 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002030698010 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @factcheckeruz |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/factcheckeruz |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 25 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 40% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 08:00 | 158 | -2 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 20:41 | 160 | +10 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 07:56 | 150 | -2 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 09:54 | 152 | -4 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 07:23 | 156 | -8 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 13:47 | 164 | +36 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 01:45 | 128 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:06 | 128 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 14 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
6 reactions across 6 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 4 | 66.7% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 16.7% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 16.7% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
57,5 MILLION DOLLARLIK “MEROS” – FIRIBGARLIK SXEMASI Tahririyatga o‘zini Fransiyaning Société Générale banki xodimi sifatida tanishtirgan Fransua-Andre Garnye nomidan elektron xat kelib tushdi. Xatda go‘yoki bankning vafot etgan mijozi 57,5 million AQSH dollari miqdoridagi depozitni qoldirgani, uning yaqin qarindoshlari yo‘qligi va mablag‘ni olish uchun qabul qiluvchiga “merosxo‘r” sifatida ko‘rsatilishi taklif etila…
😁1
"Uncha muncha" telegram kanalida "Tuyaqush yog‘i bo‘g‘imlardagi og‘riqlarni bartaraf etadi, radikulitni davolaydi, mushaklarni tiklaydi va bo‘g‘imlar harakatchanligini yaxshilaydi." degan reklama berilgan. Haqiqatdan ham tuyaqush yog‘i reklamada aytilgan xususiyatilarga egami? Reklamada keltirilgan da'volarning aksariyati ishonchli ilmiy dalillar bilan tasdiqlanmagan. Nima to‘g‘ri? ✔️ Tuyaqush yog‘i tarkibida yog‘…
🔥1
"Xokim buva!" telegram kanalida "Tezlikni me'yordan 80 km/soatdan ortiq oshirganlarning guvohnomasi bekor qilinadi." degan xabar berildi. Unda aytilishicha, "Qonunchilik palatasida ko‘rib chiqilayotgan qonun loyihasiga asosan: ➖ …
Toshkent ko‘chalarida yugurayotgan “dinozavr” videosi rostmi? "Yaxshi yomon" Telegram kanalida "Shahar ko‘chalarida noma'lum gibrid obyekt paydo bo‘ldi" sarlavhasi ostida tarqatilgan videoda bir necha soniyaga dinozavrga o‘xshash jonzot ko‘rinadi. Matnda esa u go‘yoki laboratoriyadan qochib chiqqan "gibrid obyekt" bo‘lishi mumkinligi aytiladi. Nima uchun bu feyk? 🔹 Hech qanday rasmiy tasdiq yo‘q. O‘zbekistondagi huq…
😁1
🚨 Ijtimoiy tarmoqlardagi da'vo: "Homilador ayollarga rayhon taqiqlangan". Rostmi? "Xokim buva" telegram kanalida homilador ayollar rayhonni umuman iste'mol qilmasligi kerak, deb hisoblaydi. Ammo ilmiy ma'lumotlar buni to‘liq tasdiqlamaydi. 🌿 Nimalar ma'lum? ✅ Taomlarga qo‘shiladigan yangi yoki quritilgan rayhonni odatiy miqdorda iste'mol qilish homila uchun zararli ekanini isbotlovchi ishonchli klinik dalillar mavju…
Instagramdagi Olmos News kanalida tarqatilgan videoda go‘yoki Dubaydagi supermarketlardan birida inson go‘shti sotilayotgani aytiladi. Videoda xaridor: "Bu odam go‘shtimi?" deb so‘raganda, sotuvchi "Pokistondan keltirilgan go‘sht" deb javob beradi. Biroq, ushbu video keltirilgan da’voni tasdiqlamaydi. Nima uchun bu da’vo shubhali? ❌ Supermarketning nomi, manzili, voqea sanasi va videoning asl manbasi ko‘rsatilmagan. …
Faktchek: OIV bilan kasallangan odamlar ignalarni qon bilan ifloslantirib, ularni ko‘chadagi o‘rindiqlarda qoldirsa, virus yuqishi mumkinmi? Hukm: Asosan yolg‘on va ilmiy dalillar bilan tasdiqlanmagan. Ijtimoiy tarmoqlarda, jumladan bloger doni.fayz tomonidan tarqatilgan videoda OIV (OITS virusi) bilan yashovchi odamlar ignalarni o‘z qoni bilan ifloslantirib, ularni ko‘chadagi o‘rindiqlarda qoldirayotgani aytiladi. G…
😁1
⚠️ Diqqat! Firibgarlar Olcha nomidan fuqarolarni aldamoqda. Firibgarlar Olcha xodimi sifatida qo‘ng‘iroq qilib yoki xabar yuborib, buyurtma, muddatli to‘lov, yetkazib berish yoki yutuq bahonasida SMS-kod, bank karta ma’lumotlari va shaxsiy ma’lumotlarni so‘rashmoqda. ❗️ Eslab qoling: Olcha xodimlari sizdan SMS-kod, bank kartangizning PIN-kodi yoki CVV kodini so‘ramaydi. Shubhali qo‘ng‘iroq yoki xabar olsangiz, suhbat…
#Ekofeyk Och qolgan itlar, mushuklar va cho‘chqalar o‘z egasiga hujum qilib, uni o‘ldirib yuboradi, degan gap rostmi? Ijtimoiy tarmoqlarda uzoq vaqt ovqat berilmagan uy hayvonlari o‘z egasiga hujum qilib, uni o‘ldirishi va yeyishi mumkinligi haq…
👍1
“Olma va noklarning ichiga atayin tish kavlagich (zubochistka) tiqilgan holda bozorlarda sotilmoqda” Ijtimoiy tarmoqlarda olma va noklarning ichiga atayin tish kavlagich (zubochistka) tiqilib, shunday holda bozorlarda sotilayotgani haqida xabarlar tarqalmoqda. Biroq ushbu da'voni tasdiqlovchi ishonchli dalillar mavjud emas. Nimani tekshirdik? ❌ O‘zbekistonda bunday holat ommaviy ravishda qayd etilgani haqida rasmiy …
#ekofeyk “Surxondaryoda odamlarning uyiga kirib, chorva mollarini yegan anakonda topildi” Ushbu xabarni tasdiqlovchi hech qanday ishonchli dalil yoki rasmiy ma'lumot mavjud emas. Nimani tekshirdik? ✅ Anakondalar O‘zbekistonda yashamaydi. Anakonda (Eunectes turkumi) faqat …
https://www.facebook.com/share/r/18UPzvqn4J/
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @factcheckeruz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Factchecker.uz” (@factcheckeruz), 158 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/factcheckeruz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.