Channel
ππΈπ’π― π£πͺπ³π₯β’
@factnik
On this record: Topic Β· Growth Β· Engagement Β· Telegram's recommendations Β· Cite this entry
1,318subscribers
-64 since we began measuring on 15 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 1,000β3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001847949569 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @factnik |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 30 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/factnik |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable β a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelβs own recent posts on 30 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 81% confidence. This is a modelβs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 17:24 | 1,318 | -3 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 00:35 | 1,321 | -7 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 18:19 | 1,328 | -5 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 21:05 | 1,333 | -3 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 15:26 | 1,336 | -7 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 11:41 | 1,343 | -1 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 12:57 | 1,344 | -3 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 09:09 | 1,347 | -2 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 08:42 | 1,349 | -9 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 09:37 | 1,358 | -13 |
| 30 Sept 2026, 17:15 | 1,371 | no change |
| 27 Sept 2026, 14:39 | 1,371 | -8 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 19:56 | 1,379 | -3 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 22:17 | 1,382 | first reading |
Engagement
Posts not read yet. This entry is on the register from its profile alone; the post reader has not reached it. Engagement figures appear here once posts have actually been measured β we do not publish a rate before we have the readings behind it.
Appears in Telegramβs recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly β each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseβs query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Roman_Xcom Β· 42,495
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 41 here β alongside 40 others β read 28 September 2026
@manstuness Β· 24,155
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 58 here β alongside 57 others β read 15 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegramβs list for THAT channel, not this one β see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βππΈπ’π― π£πͺπ³π₯β’β (@factnik), 1,318 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/factnik.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.