
Channel
| جادة المتفقه الحنبلي |
@fakehhanbly
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
5,163subscribers
+8 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001156989492 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @fakehhanbly |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 31 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fakehhanbly |
Topic
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 13:37 | 5,163 | -1 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 15:55 | 5,164 | +2 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 19:57 | 5,162 | -10 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 22:20 | 5,172 | +1 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 17:28 | 5,171 | +4 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 23:06 | 5,167 | no change |
| 30 Aug 2026, 03:37 | 5,167 | -1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 11:33 | 5,168 | -2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 04:56 | 5,170 | +2 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 08:37 | 5,168 | -2 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 22:24 | 5,170 | -4 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 23:15 | 5,174 | +13 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 02:37 | 5,161 | +6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:54 | 5,155 | first reading |
Engagement
Posts not read yet. This entry is on the register from its profile alone; the post reader has not reached it. Engagement figures appear here once posts have actually been measured — we do not publish a rate before we have the readings behind it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@PR0PHETMuhammad · 65,381
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 21 August 2026
@AlBuhutiFiqh · 33,527
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 4 September 2026
@Elmacademy1 · 35,464
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
@CoursesIslam · 54,700
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 24 August 2026
@murtaqaa · 23,468
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 18 September 2026
@shweier1 · 28,575
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 9 September 2026
@ktbAlulamapdf · 32,465
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 5 September 2026
@Huffazulmutoon · 26,807
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 12 September 2026
@TamayyuzCenter · 113,505
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 14 August 2026
@drhosammokhtar · 26,710
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 12 September 2026
@Algoayme · 44,732
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 28 August 2026
@dross_dross · 26,739
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 12 September 2026
@saudilawjobs · 31,811
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 5 September 2026
@mergebooks · 30,276
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 7 September 2026
@albadr9 · 30,617
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 7 September 2026
@alkelafa · 44,527
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 27 August 2026
@tahmilkutubwarosaililmiyah · 56,329
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 23 August 2026
@nahuil · 54,869
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 9 September 2026
@mutlaqaljasser · 21,805
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 22 September 2026
@amerbahjat · 32,444
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 5 September 2026
@bahith_pdf · 40,055
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 30 August 2026
@KotobEslamiah · 41,229
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 29 August 2026
@fatabi9oual5ayrat · 24
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 13 August 2026
@fosaas2 · 48,186
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 16 September 2026
This channel appears in 38 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“| جادة المتفقه الحنبلي |” (@fakehhanbly), 5,163 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fakehhanbly.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.