Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 83% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
7 measurements spanning 29 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 880–888 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Sept 2026, 04:00
881
-2
27 Aug 2026, 17:29
883
-2
20 Aug 2026, 21:56
885
-2
14 Aug 2026, 19:24
887
+1
7 Aug 2026, 19:55
886
+1
7 Aug 2026, 09:48
885
no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:39
885
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
292 reactions across 20 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
😁
134
45.9%
🔥
78
26.7%
👍
36
12.3%
❤
13
4.45%
⚡
5
1.71%
👏
5
1.71%
🤗
5
1.71%
✍
4
1.37%
🍾
4
1.37%
😍
4
1.37%
🎉
2
0.685%
👌
1
0.342%
🙏
1
0.342%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 292 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Наша регулярная, всеми любимая рубрика «Повод Есть!» сегодня особенно праздничная:
Сегодня отмечается Международный День Пива.
Этот великий праздник был придуман в 2007 году в калифорнийском городе Санта-Круз владельцем бара по имени Джесси Авшаломов, который просто решил, что первая пятница августа - это прекрасное время и прекрасный повод, после чего объявил об этом на своей страничке в соцсетях.
Праздник не п…
Создал схему отмывания... Хех 😏
А впереди ещё у ребёнка схемы распила, отката, заноса и много чего интересного. Есть куда расти и чем удивлять родителей. 😉
#БФО
Ну, Титаник, так Титаник.
Бесполезный факт в обед:
Студии Paramount за полгода проката пришлось 50 раз перевыпускать «катушки» с «Титаником» (фильм снят на пленку и не был переведен тогда в «цифру» - кинотеатры были «пленочными»), потому что из-за частых показов пленка буквально стиралась и выцветала.
А мы с вами вспоминаем, что наш ДК в первую очередь музыкальный, и дальше будет викторина о том, что все и т…
Продолжаем изучать историю кинематографа.
Сцена из фильма Джеймса Кэмерона «Титаник» до сих пор остаётся одной из самых узнаваемых в истории кино, и она может растрогать даже самого грубого мужчину.
#фактвобед #БФО
Продолжите фразу: в декабре 1895 года фильм "Прибытие поезда..." { .......}
Был показан первым3%
Вызвал панику у зрителей48%
Вызвал восторг у зрителей1%
Оставил зрителей равнодушными5%
Заставил зрителей плакать0%
Оставил несмываемый след в истории кинематографа9%
Не существовал34%
Брат сказал, что он этот фильм не смотрел, но осуждает.1%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
😁10🔥8👍1
Signed Кто-то Другой
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @falconry_eye. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
#БФО #фактвобед
Как называлась парижская улица, на которой 28 декабря 1895 года братьями Луи и Огюстом Люмьер впервые в истории был организован показ кино?
Бульвар Капуцинов38%
Бульвар Капуцинок36%
Бульвар Копуцинов3%
Бульвар Копуцинок3%
Бульвар Капуцынов7%
Бульвар Капуцынок5%
Бульвар Копуцынов1%
Бульвар Копуцынок1%
Кинематограф - порождение мирового заговора, призванное разжижать мозг населения3%
Я девочка, ничего в этих ваших викторинах не понимаю, и всегда у брата спрашиваю. Кстати, он женат?2%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Максонская ложа (Канал) @nomarketolog · 26,914 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 23 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Гоколиный слаз” (@falconry_eye), 881 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/falconry_eye.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
