Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Мысли Фндонян

Channel

Мысли Фндонян

@fandonyan

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

138subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 24 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002216965915
TypeChannel
Username@fandonyan
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded24 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/fandonyan

Growth

13513913724 August 2026 — 135 subscribers25 August 2026 — 136 subscribers31 August 2026 — 139 subscribers10 September 2026 — 138 subscribers13824 August 202610 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 16 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 134–140 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Sept 2026, 03:16138-1
31 Aug 2026, 05:12139+3
25 Aug 2026, 05:53136+1
24 Aug 2026, 17:15135first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 1 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
26s
Average length
13s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

385 reactions across 14 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥10126.2%
9123.6%
custom 54069929724178816804010.4%
custom 5418364774507359400379.61%
custom 5350688687061478598194.94%
custom 5210709719995410699153.90%
💯153.90%
🔥153.90%
custom 5195324975342432245143.64%
custom 5449693859397266147112.86%
🤩112.86%
custom 521092625506660695292.34%
custom 611165789291649726551.30%
custom 542022611454920419820.519%

Custom emoji. 9 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 385 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 1 February 2026 to 21 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 15 we hold a reading for · 13%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @fandonyan. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 February 2026 to 21 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

21 Aug 2026, 22:25 UTC50 views19 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Forwarded from @dobruchka_fmPhoto

Мой ночной гид по красивым местам ✨

8❤‍🔥3custom 54183647745073594003custom 61116578929164972653custom 52109262550666069522

1 Jun 2026, 01:48 UTC490 views21 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥14🔥61

1 Jun 2026, 01:48 UTC196 views20 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Forwarded from @lia_erinPhoto

💫 3:53 встречаем лето по традиции

❤‍🔥128

12 May 2026, 18:51 UTC264 views24 reactionsread 24 August 2026

Просто послушайте, сколько здесь тепла😍 Всем желаю таких друзей, которые поддерживают и вдохновляют🫂 (голосовое от любимой Юлечки)

❤‍🔥12custom 54069929724178816807custom 53506886870614785985

12 May 2026, 18:51 UTC211 views16 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥11custom 52107097199954106993custom 52109262550666069522

12 May 2026, 16:15 UTC198 views44 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

17❤‍🔥14custom 54069929724178816808custom 52109262550666069525

10 May 2026, 11:20 UTC182 views37 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Photo

🩵 Мысль дня Часто нам страшна не сама ошибка, а то, что мы почувствуем и подумаем о себе после неё

custom 541836477450735940015custom 52107097199954106997❤‍🔥6custom 51953249753424322453custom 54069929724178816803custom 611165789291649726521

5 May 2026, 09:21 UTC183 views33 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Photo

Пауза — это не всегда откат. Иногда это последствия слишком жёсткой дисциплины Мы привыкли восхищаться людьми, которые умеют «собраться» и идти хоть через «не могу». Но редко задумываемся: а какой ценой это даётся? Если после дисциплины у вас всё меньше энергии и всё сильнее желание исчезнуть из того, что вы вроде бы любите, возможно, это уже не дисциплина. Возможно, это насилие над собой В таком режиме пауза стан

16custom 54069929724178816807custom 53506886870614785986custom 54183647745073594004

7 Mar 2026, 16:41 UTC284 views30 reactions5 Starsread 24 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня вышла на улицу, а там — настоящая весна и солнце 🌞 Щурилась и думала: «Ну наконец-то пора искать солнечные очки! Тепло, хорошо. Сразу и настроение лучше становится» Потом вспомнила, что это ощущение «хорошо» возникает не просто так☁️ Помимо того, что с солнцем всё гораздо красивее, дневной свет также стимулирует выработку серотонина! Того самого «гормона счастья» Так что если вы сегодня выходили на улицу и

16custom 54183647745073594006custom 52107097199954106995custom 51953249753424322452❤‍🔥1

25 Feb 2026, 16:33 UTC320 views37 reactions1 Starread 24 August 2026
Photo

Видео, которое я не хотела выкладывать, набрало 1400+ просмотров🩵 Записала его ещё в январе, но затянула с монтажом. Хотела добавить один момент, долго с ним возилась, но никак не получалось как я хотела. В феврале поняла, что тянуть больше нельзя и надо уже выкладывать 🩵 Но тут началось дикое сопротивление и внутренний диалог по типу: «Уже неактуально, поздно. Я же в видео про Новый год в самом начале говорю. Може

💯15custom 544969385939726614710custom 519532497534243224553custom 54069929724178816802custom 54202261145492041982

18 Feb 2026, 17:35 UTC267 views28 reactionsread 24 August 2026

45% из вас считают счастье навыком. Радует, что мы на одной волне 🤝 На самом деле, вы действительно можете натренировать свой мозг быть счастливым. Не гнаться за яркими ощущениями, а замечать маленькие радости в моменте 🤩 Говорю как человек, который покупал желанные гаджеты с покерфейсом и мыслями «даже это уже не радует» Что при этом происходит в мозге? Вы создаёте новые нейронные связи, которые фокусируются не на

custom 540699297241788168012custom 53506886870614785988❤‍🔥5custom 51953249753424322453

3 Feb 2026, 12:37 UTC337 views6 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Poll

Счастье - это

  1. то, что появится, когда у меня будет всё, что нужно👩‍❤️‍💋‍👨8%
  2. состояние, которое закладывается с детства, тут уже как получилось💡11%
  3. что-то спонтанное, зависит от того, как день сложится и какие люди встретятся 🤩25%
  4. навык, который развивается🤩44%
  5. для меня «счастье» как концепт не особо понятно🌿11%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

custom 54183647745073594006

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @fandonyan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

3 Feb 2026, 12:37 UTCFinal Results36 voters

Счастье - это

  1. то, что появится, когда у меня будет всё, что нужно👩‍❤️‍💋‍👨8%
  2. состояние, которое закладывается с детства, тут уже как получилось💡11%
  3. что-то спонтанное, зависит от того, как день сложится и какие люди встретятся 🤩25%
  4. навык, который развивается🤩44%
  5. для меня «счастье» как концепт не особо понятно🌿11%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 1 February 2026 to 21 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Мысли Фндонян” (@fandonyan), 138 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fandonyan.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.