Channel
@farangnama
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
9,859subscribers
-84 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001123790137 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @farangnama |
| Created | Between 1 June 2017 and 30 September 2020 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/farangnama |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 80% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 02:00 | 9,859 | -10 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 20:38 | 9,869 | -6 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 19:16 | 9,875 | -7 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 12:01 | 9,882 | -3 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 20:08 | 9,885 | -7 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 14:25 | 9,892 | -11 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 12:26 | 9,903 | -1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 22:33 | 9,904 | -7 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 09:46 | 9,911 | -6 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 18:43 | 9,917 | -4 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 16:27 | 9,921 | -11 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 08:20 | 9,932 | -7 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:01 | 9,939 | -4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 14:51 | 9,943 | first reading |
53 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 37 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 53 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 53 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,476 reactions across 53 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 757 | 51.3% | |
| 🤣 | 370 | 25.1% | |
| ❤ | 220 | 14.9% | |
| 🤮 | 55 | 3.73% | |
| 😢 | 44 | 2.98% | |
| 👎 | 19 | 1.29% | |
| 🤬 | 5 | 0.339% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 0.271% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.068% | |
| 😭 | 1 | 0.068% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 53 of the 53 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,476 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 53 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
اومدم کانادا و 6 ساله تفریحی نداشتم! با تصور یه زندگی پر از عشق و حال میری ولی نمیدونی سیستم کاری باهات میکنه که میگی من روز های تعطیل هم کار میکنم! _ آخه تعطیلی رو بمونم خونه تنها چی کار کنم؟ چون تنهایی و کسی رو نداری و چیزی نیست که بتونه خوشحالت کنه، خودتو همیشه سرگرم کار میکنی https://t.me/farangnama
👍12😢6❤1🤣1
من اگه 5 هزار یورو پول داشتم که اصلا مهاجرت نمیکردم! _ من اگه بورسیه بشم، دیگه نیاز به سرمایه برای مهاجرت ندارم _نداری؟ حداقل 5 هزار تا باید با خودت بیاری، تازه اگر شهر های اصلی بخوای بری بیشترم باید بیاری! https://t.me/farangnama
👍14❤3
خیلی ها با تصور ایلان ماسک شدن مهاجرت میکنن اما سیستم یه جوریه که تورو توی هر سطحی که باشی نگه میداره! یعنی هر چه قدر هم سعی کنی درآمدت بیشتر بشه ، به همون نسبت مالیات ها هم زیاد میشه و نمیزاره پیشرفت کنی https://t.me/farangnama
👍17🤣3❤1
توی امارات حواستون باشه سرما نخورید، که مجبور نشید حقوق یک ماهتون رو خرج دکتر و دارو کنید https://t.me/farangnama
👍16❤1🤮1
_تا الان چه حسی از مهاجرت داری ؟ _همه پولمو دادم BMW گرفتم ولی... https://t.me/farangnama
👍8❤3👎1
اوضاع ترکیه انقدر خراب شده که سه سال پیش با 100 هزار لیر میشد خونه خرید اما الان همکارم همون 100 هزار تا رو ازم دستی (قرض) میخواد! https://t.me/farangnama
👍20❤1
درد غربت ته نداره! و آدم فکر نکنه غربت فقط مال اونیه که خودش مهاجرت کرده! بچه های نسل دومی که بیرون ایران به دنیا میان هم همون حسی رو دارن که والدینشون دارن! انگار این درد غربت از والدین رسوخ میکنه به بچه هاشون ... @farangnama
👍21😢5🤣3❤2👎1
Signed FaraPost
بعد مهاجرت فقط قصه اون هایی که میرسن رو میشنویم... صدای اونی که شکست خورد یا اونی که با تموم خوب و بدش گفت نخواستم و برمیگرده ایران رو نمیشنویم انگار مهاجرت فقط یه شوئه اونی که برای دیده شدنش مهاجرت کرده بلندگو میگیره که ببینید من چقدر خوشبختم و شما نیستید! درستش اینه که آدم خودشو با خودش بسنجه... @farangnama
😢8👍7❤1
Signed FaraPost
مدلی از مهاجرت رویایی که همه دوست دارن اون طوری مهاجرت کنن: نخون فقط امضا کن! مگه شک داری اون طرف بهشته؟ @farangnama
🤣16👍3❤2
Signed FaraPost
_توی آمریکا در خونه ها بازه! انقدر که اونجا امنیت هست... _عه؟ پس این تله هایی که در خونه هاشون میزارن که دزد برش داره و با انفجارش، دزد لو بره چیه ؟ @farangnama
🤣24👍9❤2👏1
Signed FaraPost
راهکار بلاگر ایتالیایی واسه اینکه کف خیابون همه چیزشو ندزدن : @farangnama
🤣21❤3
Signed FaraPost
_ کاش ما ایرانی ها هم مثل چینی ها کتاب خوان بودیم که مثل اونا حتی تو رستوران و کافه هم کتاب میخوندیم _ واقعا؟ مطمئنی؟ @farangnama
👍19❤1
Signed FaraPost
Showing the 12 most recent of 53 posts we hold for @farangnama. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“فرنگ نما” (@farangnama), 9,859 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/farangnama.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.