Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for FARASOO فراسو

Channel

FARASOO فراسو

@farasoomedia

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

244subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003984470901
TypeChannel
Username@farasoomedia
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 27 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/farasoomedia

Growth

2422482458 August 2026 — 242 subscribers8 August 2026 — 242 subscribers15 August 2026 — 248 subscribers29 August 2026 — 246 subscribers5 September 2026 — 244 subscribers2448 August 20265 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 29 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 241–249 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Sept 2026, 21:21244-2
29 Aug 2026, 01:57246-2
15 Aug 2026, 02:59248+6
8 Aug 2026, 09:47242no change
8 Aug 2026, 00:19242first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 27 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

65 reactions across 13 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍4163.1%
1523.1%
👌46.15%
👎23.08%
😁23.08%
👏11.54%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 65 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 06:54 UTC18 viewsread 8 August 2026

فراسوی هفته ایران؛ فردای نامعلوم بخشی از معادلاتی که جایگاه ایران و منطقه را تعریف می‌کردند در حال فروپاشی‌اند، بی‌آنکه هنوز قواعد جایگزین روشنی پدید آمده باشد. جمهوری اسلامی پاسخ روشنی برای جایگاه ایران در این وضعیت ارائه نکرده و مخالفانش نیز هنوز نشان نداده‌اند که می‌توانند از فرسایش نظم موجود، بدیلی منسجم بسازند @farasoomedia 🔗

7 Aug 2026, 17:25 UTC27 viewsread 8 August 2026

دیپلماسیِ تضعیف‌شده ایران می‌تواند به توافق هرمز برسد؟ Can Iran’s Diminished Diplomats Deliver a Hormuz Deal? منبع: The Wall Street Journal تنگه هرمز تنها یک آبراه راهبردی نیست؛ آزمونی برای سنجش میزان انسجام و کارآمدی ساختار قدرت جمهوری اسلامی در دوران پس از علی خامنه‌ای است @farasoomedia 🔗

4 Aug 2026, 19:34 UTC98 viewsread 8 August 2026

خاورمیانه جدید از نگاه محمدجواد ظریف An Iranian Vision of the New Middle East منبع: Foreign Affairs نویسنده: محمدجواد ظریف این دیدگاه را نباید لزوماً موضع واحد حاکمیت دانست، زیرا جریان‌های دیگری نیز در ساختار قدرت حضور دارند که تقابل با غرب را بخشی از راهبرد بلندمدت نظام می‌دانند @farasoomedia 🔗

4 Aug 2026, 16:27 UTC106 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

آیا ستاره سیاسی رضا پهلوی در حال افول است؟ Iran: Is Reza Pahlavi’s Political Star Fading? منبع: Deutsche Welle (DW) نویسنده: Elina Farhadi روزنامه‌نگار دویچه‌وله در حوزه ایران و خاورمیانه پرسش اصلی شاید دیگر این نباشد که آیا رضا پهلوی تضعیف شده است، بلکه این باشد که آیا اساساً الگوی «رهبر در تبعید» هنوز می‌تواند مبنای یک گذار سیاسی در ایران باشد… از این منظر، شاید پرسش آینده اپوزیسیون ایران دیگر این نباشد که «چه ک

👍21

3 Aug 2026, 06:30 UTC63 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

رهبران ایران اکنون تردید دارند که توافق صلح امکان‌پذیر باشد Iran’s Leaders Now Doubt a Peace Deal Is Possible منبع: The American Conservative نویسنده: Esfandyar Batmanghelidj درباره نویسنده: اسفندیار باتمانقلیج پژوهشگر اقتصاد سیاسی ایران و بنیان‌گذار و مدیر Bourse & Bazaar Foundation است. حوزه پژوهشی او اقتصاد ایران، تحریم‌ها و دیپلماسی اقتصادی است و مقالاتش در نشریاتی چون Foreign Affairs، Foreign Policy، Politic

👍3

3 Aug 2026, 00:53 UTC55 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

طرحهای عبور از تنگه هرمز نقشه فارسی ، بازسازی بخش مهم از نقشه اصلی انگلیست @farasoomedia

👍2

2 Aug 2026, 07:15 UTC115 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

رهبران ایران بر سر جنگ متحدند، اما بر سر هدف آن نه a united front over the war but are divided over what the goal is منبع: Associated Press (AP) نویسندگان: امیرحسین رادجی، لی کیث جنگ همزمان در دو جبهه جریان دارد؛ یکی در برابر دشمن خارجی و دیگری بر سر شکل و جهت جمهوری اسلامی پس از جنگ @farasoomedia 🔗

3

1 Aug 2026, 21:42 UTCviews —

FARASOO فراسو pinned «فراسو؛ پروژه‌ای مشترک میان انسان و هوش مصنوعی @farasoomedia 🔗»

1 Aug 2026, 21:34 UTC99 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

فراسو؛ پروژه‌ای مشترک میان انسان و هوش مصنوعی @farasoomedia 🔗

5👏1

31 Jul 2026, 20:36 UTC120 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

فراسوی هفته جنگ؛ روایت ها در برابر واقعیت ها در سیاست، پاسخ‌ها معمولاً دیرتر از پرسش‌ها تغییر می‌کنند. اما وقتی واقعیت، پرسش‌های تازه‌ای را بر دولت‌ها، رهبران، مخالفان، تحلیلگران و افکار عمومی تحمیل می‌کند، دیر یا زود پاسخ‌ها نیز ناچار به تغییر خواهند شد @farasoomedia 🔗

👍51

30 Jul 2026, 21:38 UTC414 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

فایل صوتی فارسی نگاهی به مقاله خبری تحلیلی رویترز در مورد شاهزاده رضا پهلوی - ساخته هوش مصنوعی گوگل مدت ۱۷ دقیقه به درخواست شما گاهی فایل صوتی نیز در فراسو به اشتراک می گذاریم . این دومین تجربه فراسو از این نوع است. @farasoomedia

👍83

30 Jul 2026, 21:11 UTC88 viewsread 8 August 2026

افول حمایت افکار عمومی آمریکا از جنگ ایران؛ نظرسنجی AP-NORC چه تصویری ارائه می‌دهد؟ How views on Trump’s handling of Iran have shifted, according to a new AP-NORC poll منبع : Associated Press (AP) ، ۶۴ درصد آمریکایی‌ها معتقدند جنگ با ایران ارزش جنگیدن نداشته است و تنها ۳۳ درصد آن را ارزشمند می‌دانند. این مخالفت در میان دموکرات‌ها (۸۷ درصد) و مستقل‌ها (۶۸ درصد) بسیار گسترده است، اما حتی ۳۷ درصد جمهوری‌خواهان نیز جن

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @farasoomedia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“FARASOO فراسو” (@farasoomedia), 244 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/farasoomedia.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.