Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
10 measurements spanning 30 days, net +79. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,531–1,635 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 04:40
1,623
+16
13 Sept 2026, 01:41
1,607
+3
9 Sept 2026, 05:56
1,604
+57
4 Sept 2026, 03:37
1,547
-2
31 Aug 2026, 10:15
1,549
+1
28 Aug 2026, 13:58
1,548
-2
25 Aug 2026, 06:33
1,550
+7
22 Aug 2026, 14:04
1,543
-1
19 Aug 2026, 03:44
1,544
no change
18 Aug 2026, 09:30
1,544
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 12 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 36s
Average length
14s
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
526 reactions across 20 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤣
296
56.3%
💯
108
20.5%
❤
43
8.17%
😁
17
3.23%
❤🔥
14
2.66%
🌚
9
1.71%
👌
9
1.71%
🤯
8
1.52%
😭
6
1.14%
🙏
5
0.951%
👍
3
0.57%
💔
3
0.57%
🗿
2
0.38%
🫡
2
0.38%
🥰
1
0.19%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 526 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 August 2026 to 18 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Cheating is a conscious choice , not an accidental mistake
YES97%
N05%
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Areee guys agr foreign policy pe question aa gaya
Toh wo hug wala point likhna zaruri hai kya ?
Diagram bana dunga 😁 mm
Context shri shri rahul gandhi ji ka criticism wala video 😁
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @farzimeme. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Cheating is a conscious choice , not an accidental mistake
YES97%
N05%
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 August 2026 to 18 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Smriti Shah_UPSC @smriti_shah · 62,834 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 21 August 2026
INDIAN EXPRESS NEWSPAPER @indianexpress_newspaper1 · 37,552 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 1 September 2026
Mudit Gupta - UPSC and Beyond..... @muditgupta · 28,913 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 9 September 2026
Essay कैसे @essaykaise1 · 23,234 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 18 September 2026
ETERNAL CIVIL ACADEMY™ @EternalCivilAcademy · 24,380 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 16 September 2026
Compilations by Dheeraj Panchal @dheerajpanchal · 23,557 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 18 September 2026
IAS Corridor @iascorridor · 25,910 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 13 September 2026
CSE Marksheets, News and Memes @upsc_topper_marksheets · 29,197 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 8 September 2026
IASExam-Congress @IASExamcongress · 38,711 Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 31 August 2026
UPSC - Previous year questions MCQ Quiz @upsc_prelims_mcq_pyq_quiz · 62,323 Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 21 August 2026
This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“FARZI MEME” (@farzimeme), 1,623 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/farzimeme.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.