Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 日向色图屋(半纯净版)

Channel

日向色图屋(半纯净版)

@fashide

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

32,472subscribers

+187 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001176716297
TypeChannel
Username@fashide
Description只发超好看的二次元色图!!!!! 没有视频,没有动图,99%内容为插画,1%为套图,无ai(除了早期没删干净的)! 随缘更新,就我一个人发图,平时攒一攒,攒够了就发。 (进入讨论群输入“111”随机观看频道已发布色图) ——讨论群—— https://t.me/shuijiaonei ——ai分群(很少发)——https://t.me/ai_miaonei ——我—— t.me/star_moon_ko
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live23 October 2026
Measurements held45
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 23 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/fashide

Topic

Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

32,28132,48232,381.56 August 2026 — 32,285 subscribers6 August 2026 — 32,291 subscribers7 August 2026 — 32,281 subscribers9 August 2026 — 32,301 subscribers10 August 2026 — 32,298 subscribers11 August 2026 — 32,299 subscribers13 August 2026 — 32,298 subscribers14 August 2026 — 32,303 subscribers15 August 2026 — 32,299 subscribers17 August 2026 — 32,295 subscribers18 August 2026 — 32,293 subscribers19 August 2026 — 32,307 subscribers20 August 2026 — 32,324 subscribers21 August 2026 — 32,336 subscribers22 August 2026 — 32,363 subscribers24 August 2026 — 32,371 subscribers25 August 2026 — 32,373 subscribers26 August 2026 — 32,375 subscribers27 August 2026 — 32,384 subscribers28 August 2026 — 32,390 subscribers29 August 2026 — 32,395 subscribers30 August 2026 — 32,392 subscribers31 August 2026 — 32,390 subscribers1 September 2026 — 32,393 subscribers2 September 2026 — 32,396 subscribers5 September 2026 — 32,388 subscribers8 September 2026 — 32,374 subscribers11 September 2026 — 32,371 subscribers13 September 2026 — 32,372 subscribers14 September 2026 — 32,389 subscribers16 September 2026 — 32,413 subscribers18 September 2026 — 32,440 subscribers1 October 2026 — 32,453 subscribers6 October 2026 — 32,470 subscribers11 October 2026 — 32,479 subscribers14 October 2026 — 32,482 subscribers15 October 2026 — 32,480 subscribers16 October 2026 — 32,464 subscribers17 October 2026 — 32,467 subscribers18 October 2026 — 32,459 subscribers19 October 2026 — 32,473 subscribers20 October 2026 — 32,477 subscribers21 October 2026 — 32,467 subscribers22 October 2026 — 32,468 subscribers23 October 2026 — 32,472 subscribers32,4726 August 202623 October 2026
45 measurements spanning 78 days, net +187. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 32,251–32,512 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 45
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
23 Oct 2026, 13:0432,472+4
22 Oct 2026, 14:4132,468+1
21 Oct 2026, 06:5532,467-10
20 Oct 2026, 07:0132,477+4
19 Oct 2026, 03:4032,473+14
18 Oct 2026, 05:4732,459-8
17 Oct 2026, 03:5932,467+3
16 Oct 2026, 04:5832,464-16
15 Oct 2026, 04:0832,480-2
14 Oct 2026, 01:4832,482+3
11 Oct 2026, 05:5932,479+9
6 Oct 2026, 23:0232,470+17
1 Oct 2026, 23:3832,453+13
18 Sept 2026, 14:0132,440+27
16 Sept 2026, 08:3832,413+24
14 Sept 2026, 17:1932,389+17
13 Sept 2026, 05:5632,372+1
11 Sept 2026, 04:5932,371-3
8 Sept 2026, 08:0032,374-14
5 Sept 2026, 04:1732,388first reading

Engagement

29 posts held, back to 1 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 135 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.8%
avg views ÷ 32,472 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,830
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.366%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 29 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 October 2026
Posts held29 (1 July 2026 – 6 October 2026)
Views total7,650
Reactions total28
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken23 Oct 2026, 15:08 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈8,920
Videos
≈1
Links
≈13

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

667 reactions across 24 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤27541.2%
👎13119.6%
👍9213.8%
😡527.80%
😭456.75%
🤣355.25%
🤔142.10%
😍131.95%
👻60.9%
💔30.45%
🥰10.15%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 29 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 667 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 1 July 2026 to 6 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Oct 2026, 14:19 UTC≈3,870 views18 reactionsread 23 October 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍17❤1

6 Oct 2026, 13:40 UTC≈3,780 views10 reactionsread 23 October 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍10

14 Sept 2026, 14:47 UTC≈7,510 views33 reactionsread 23 October 2026
Photo

完了,前面电脑预测时间失误,没这么简单

🤣27❤4👻2

14 Sept 2026, 14:22 UTC≈7,300 views17 reactionsread 23 October 2026
Photo

要换手机了,严肃转移色图中

👍15❤2

28 Aug 2026, 12:51 UTC≈3,540 views52 reactionsread 9 September 2026

搜了一圈,根本没几张,更没一张看的入眼的,全世界的画师吃什么干饭呢😡

😭25❤17🤣8🤔1🥰1

27 Aug 2026, 03:56 UTC≈4,240 views16 reactionsread 9 September 2026
Photo

1天之内,我要看到她的新衣服色图

😍13❤3

23 Aug 2026, 12:14 UTC≈5,550 views27 reactionsread 9 September 2026

最近陆续找了几千杂图,慢慢整理,之后再把之前手选的色图先发了

❤27

19 Aug 2026, 15:47 UTC≈6,900 views14 reactionsread 9 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤12💔2

Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @fashide. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“日向色图屋(半纯净版)” (@fashide), 32,472 subscribers as measured 23 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fashide.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.