Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for FASHION GEEK

Channel

FASHION GEEK

@fashiongeeek

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

10,535subscribers

-90 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001524632367
TypeChannel
Username@fashiongeeek
Created26 June 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/fashiongeeek

Topic

Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

10,53510,80210,668.57 August 2026 — 10,625 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,625 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,623 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,621 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,612 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,656 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,697 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,728 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,733 subscribers16 August 2026 — 10,739 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,733 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,727 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,729 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,732 subscribers21 August 2026 — 10,802 subscribers23 August 2026 — 10,756 subscribers24 August 2026 — 10,729 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,706 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,686 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,669 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,662 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,653 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,644 subscribers31 August 2026 — 10,636 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,635 subscribers2 September 2026 — 10,628 subscribers4 September 2026 — 10,614 subscribers7 September 2026 — 10,594 subscribers10 September 2026 — 10,585 subscribers12 September 2026 — 10,570 subscribers14 September 2026 — 10,559 subscribers15 September 2026 — 10,546 subscribers18 September 2026 — 10,535 subscribers7 August 202618 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 42 days, net -90. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,495–10,842 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 07:5510,535-11
15 Sept 2026, 23:5910,546-13
14 Sept 2026, 05:5710,559-11
12 Sept 2026, 12:1610,570-15
10 Sept 2026, 11:3710,585-9
7 Sept 2026, 07:5510,594-20
4 Sept 2026, 13:1810,614-14
2 Sept 2026, 21:5410,628-7
1 Sept 2026, 18:1810,635-1
31 Aug 2026, 18:1810,636-8
30 Aug 2026, 21:0410,644-9
29 Aug 2026, 22:1210,653-9
28 Aug 2026, 22:0310,662-7
27 Aug 2026, 23:4210,669-17
26 Aug 2026, 21:4510,686-20
25 Aug 2026, 20:4310,706-23
24 Aug 2026, 20:2410,729-27
23 Aug 2026, 05:4410,756-46
21 Aug 2026, 16:1210,802+70
20 Aug 2026, 11:1410,732first reading

Engagement

91 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 40 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.75%
avg views ÷ 10,535 subscribers
Avg views / post
290
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.92%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 91 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 15 of 16 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held91 (6 August 2026 – 1 September 2026)
Views total4,636
Reactions total135
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken1 Sept 2026, 20:41 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
10m 25s
Average length
33s

Measured directly from 19 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,100 reactions across 89 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 79.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤87079.1%
🔥978.82%
❤‍🔥393.55%
🥰211.91%
👍121.09%
🤣100.909%
🕊90.818%
😢90.818%
🤩70.636%
💔60.545%
💘60.545%
🤨40.364%
🙈30.273%
👏20.182%
😍20.182%
😱20.182%
🎉10.091%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 89 of the 91 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,100 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 91 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Sept 2026, 20:37 UTC17 viewsread 1 September 2026
Photo

Пока Хейличка готовится к запуску Rhode в Европе 30 сентября, художник Ricollin Moodley нарисовал её портрет, используя только блески для губ Rhode!💄💓 И, к слову, сам художник признался, что был удивлен их насыщенной пигментации Какие же талантливые люди! На такой классной и креативной ноте и завершим этот день. Good night🌟

1 Sept 2026, 15:22 UTC272 views8 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

Майли Сайрус официально вступает в новую эру — в преддверии выхода своей юбилейной десятой пластинки она во всех соцсетях убрала фамилию и теперь подписывается просто MILEY❤ Кажется, нас ждет что-то интересное!

❤8

1 Sept 2026, 12:04 UTC323 views13 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

Джончик Андерсон безусловно умеет удивлять — только посмотрите, какую забавную витрину он придумал для ювелирных украшений Dior!🌸🪷 Продолжение темы цветочного сада — теперь в виде уменьшенной копии парижского сада Тюильри

❤13

1 Sept 2026, 08:27 UTC296 views13 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

Вот и настало 1 сентября — всех, кто учится, поздравляем! И параллельно смотрим на первую работу Питера Мюлье в качестве креативного директора Versace — Николь Кидман появилась в дебютном образе на премьере фильма “Практическая магия 2” в Лос-Анджелесе Вроде бы выглядит здорово!

❤13

31 Aug 2026, 17:42 UTC494 views10 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

Met Gala 2027 под угрозой?! Джон Гальяно решил не делать выставку в Метрополитен-музее после хейта и угроз из-за его “темного” прошлого, а точнее спорных высказываний, которые когда-то привели к его отмене. Соответственно, бала в честь Гальяно тоже не будет. А новую тему Met пока не объявили Мое предположение, что новые спонсоры Met Gala поставили Анне Винтур ультиматум — и ей пришлось попросить на выход Джона Галь…

❤‍🔥4❤3👍2💔1

31 Aug 2026, 11:38 UTC488 views18 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

Сногсшибательная Роузи стала героиней сентябрьского номера Harper’s Bazaar Australia🤎 На Роузи — тотал-луки Saint Laurent, и как же ей это все идет!

❤17💔1

29 Aug 2026, 12:24 UTC74 views3 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Гарри Стайлзика посмотрим — он стал героем новой обложки W Magazine! На этот раз Гарри примерил на себя Miu Miu, Saint Laurent, Dior, Prada, Celine, Ludovic de Saint Sernin и Chanel

❤3

29 Aug 2026, 09:34 UTC166 views3 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Доброе субботнее начинаем с новых стритов Селин Дион, которая прилетела в Париж, чтобы наконец дать долгожданные концерты после долгого перерыва🤍

❤3

28 Aug 2026, 19:53 UTC350 views8 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Безосам больше не рады на Met Gala?👀 Анна Винтур ищет новых спонсоров для Met Gala 2027 после, мягко говоря, неоднозначной реакции публики и некоторых почетных гостей на эту парочку на прошедшем балу. Среди потенциальных претендентов, которые могут профинансировать фэшн-гулянья в новом году — Джордж и Амаль Клуни, а также генеральный директор Netflix Тед Сарандос с супругой Также поговаривают, что на этот раз Анна …

❤8

28 Aug 2026, 15:03 UTC345 views10 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

К слову, список любимых съемок Сильвестра Мако пополняется — на этот раз Карди Би для новой обложки Vogue Arabia♥️ Карди в образах Georges Hobeika, Loewe, Alaïa, Gucci, Saint Laurent и Richard Quinn

❤‍🔥7❤3

28 Aug 2026, 08:15 UTC291 views4 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Всё, отбой по колонке Skylrk — теперь главная хотелка от Джастина Бибера вот этот MP3-плеер в стиле нулевых!🎧 Джастин пока не поделился подробностями о дате релиза, а только выложил тизер в своих соцсетях, но мы ждем

❤3👍1

27 Aug 2026, 16:47 UTC383 views14 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Джиджи Хадид позвала сестренку Беллу в новую рекламную кампанию своего бренда Guest In Residence сезона осень-зима 2026🤎 Ловим ковбой-вайбы🐎

❤14

Showing the 12 most recent of 91 posts we hold for @fashiongeeek. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

rita pérskaya
@ritaperskayaa · 42,100
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 28 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“FASHION GEEK” (@fashiongeeek), 10,535 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fashiongeeek.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.