Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Fashion Snob

Channel

Fashion Snob

@fashionsnob

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

906subscribers

+8 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001244164684
TypeChannel
Username@fashionsnob
Created19 January 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/fashionsnob

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

8989109047 August 2026 — 898 subscribers7 August 2026 — 898 subscribers7 August 2026 — 908 subscribers14 August 2026 — 910 subscribers22 August 2026 — 909 subscribers29 August 2026 — 908 subscribers8 September 2026 — 907 subscribers15 September 2026 — 906 subscribers9067 August 202615 September 2026
8 measurements spanning 39 days, net +8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 896–912 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 13:01906-1
8 Sept 2026, 10:17907-1
29 Aug 2026, 20:55908-1
22 Aug 2026, 17:38909-1
14 Aug 2026, 13:17910+2
7 Aug 2026, 18:27908+10
7 Aug 2026, 09:17898no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:50898first reading

Engagement

5 posts held, back to 14 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

8 reactions across 4 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
8100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 09:00 UTC17 viewsread 7 August 2026

Не кажется нелогичным и даже нечестным по отношению к покупателю просьба поддержать селлеров маркетплейсов или бренды заказом? Ну то есть, в одном случае селлеры запустили весь товар на площадку и зависят от того, как работает она и как меняет свои правила и комиссии, а в другом - текущая модель бизнеса не вывозит реалий спроса и покупательских возможностей. Интересно, какие проводятся мероприятия параллельно с взыва

3 Aug 2026, 20:39 UTC68 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @straightfacePhoto

В сет-дизайне новой кампании Ferragamo использовали скульптуру Вилли Коула 1994 года.

2

15 Jul 2026, 20:43 UTC170 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Нуууу, это скорее шик первой и последней коллекции Дарио Витале для Versace Но на Befree гнать вообще неохота, люблю их

3

14 Jul 2026, 12:18 UTC125 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Как же я тащусь от этих «сороконожек». На фотографиях работы студентки британского Royal College Of Art BOUTASHKOVA.

1

Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @fashionsnob. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Fashion Snob” (@fashionsnob), 906 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fashionsnob.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.