服了
Signed 𝙷𝚎𝚛𝚋𝚎𝚛𝚝 𝙶𝚊𝚘

Channel
@fatgao
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
205subscribers
+11 since we began measuring on 20 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001253813895 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @fatgao |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 20 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fatgao |
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 24 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 48% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Sept 2026, 11:39 | 205 | +3 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 22:22 | 202 | +2 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 07:55 | 200 | +4 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 11:13 | 196 | +2 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 04:30 | 194 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 6 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
18 reactions across 3 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 13 | 72.2% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 11.1% | |
| 🤣 | 2 | 11.1% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 5.56% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 18 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 19 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
服了
Signed 𝙷𝚎𝚛𝚋𝚎𝚛𝚝 𝙶𝚊𝚘
看起来是个大问题,给火山引擎提了工单,客服说了「稍等」之后5个小时了还没回我,我的Coding Plan 5小时额度都已经重置一次了。
Signed 𝙷𝚎𝚛𝚋𝚎𝚛𝚝 𝙶𝚊𝚘
File, posted without a caption
Signed 𝙷𝚎𝚛𝚋𝚎𝚛𝚝 𝙶𝚊𝚘
File, posted without a caption
Signed 𝙷𝚎𝚛𝚋𝚎𝚛𝚝 𝙶𝚊𝚘
智谱在我代码里到处大小便?
Signed 𝙷𝚎𝚛𝚋𝚎𝚛𝚝 𝙶𝚊𝚘
通过Apple订阅把Claude退回来了80刀,然后转头把ChatGPT升级成20x,用新号开Claude Pro
Signed 𝙷𝚎𝚛𝚋𝚎𝚛𝚝 𝙶𝚊𝚘
甲方的底气: 昨天下班前提的需求,今天早上九点开始催进度。 甲方的能力: Docker 里装 Chrome 抓包;Python 服务部署两小时;每次发版都忘记更新缓存,提醒了下次照样忘。
Signed 𝙷𝚎𝚛𝚋𝚎𝚛𝚝 𝙶𝚊𝚘
天塌了草
Signed 𝙷𝚎𝚛𝚋𝚎𝚛𝚝 𝙶𝚊𝚘
最近接了一个基于字节火山的HiAgent做Agent工作流的活,发觉这种AI工作流或低代码平台还真是会给开发者带来工作,毕竟它们压根不面向AI编程工具来做优化,反而是在做各种负优化,逼迫它们的用户给自己的开发者制造体力工作。
Signed 𝙷𝚎𝚛𝚋𝚎𝚛𝚝 𝙶𝚊𝚘
淘宝最开始推出淘宝桌面版App时我还是很支持的,因为淘宝当时总算是想起优化电脑用户的使用体验了。 但用久了之后发现,淘宝几乎是在用桌面版App强奸用户电脑。它不仅不按照macOS注册开机项的标准方案来做开机自启,还制造自己的通知弹窗,并且搜索商品时的输入展示bug(乱码、空格变加号等)并没有解决,做得简直比直接WebCatalog创建一个淘宝Electron版还要差。 正好最近要清理系统空间为下载本地模型做做准备,第一个删的想都没想就决定是淘宝桌面版App了。
Signed 𝙷𝚎𝚛𝚋𝚎𝚛𝚝 𝙶𝚊𝚘
几个月前被一个老同事邀请参加一个副业项目,说可以去听一节课,于是我就去了,位置在建国门附近的一个公寓楼。结果到了之后,讲课的那个人对于整个项目神神秘秘的,中途只给我看了一张截图,说是一个股票类的投资游戏,我问他盈利点在哪里,结果对方只说是投资裂变分红啥的,我猜大概跟安利传销差不多了,于是找了个由头溜走了。 回家后在Google和ChatGPT分别搜索了一下相关信息,结果高度指向「AS拆分盘」「ACE拆分盘」,就是一个安利式骗局,入局者交的钱基本上被上线瓜分,自己想要回本钱基本只能靠不断地拉新人发展下线。这个骗局已经被多次打击,但依然在中文圈有一定规模影响力, 我委婉地跟前同事说了这是个骗局的事,但他还是不相信,觉得这是真的能赚钱的副业项目,我也没办法了,只好默默和他断了联系。
❤2
Signed 𝙷𝚎𝚛𝚋𝚎𝚛𝚝 𝙶𝚊𝚘
本来对微信好感就低,这下更差了🧐
Signed 𝙷𝚎𝚛𝚋𝚎𝚛𝚝 𝙶𝚊𝚘
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @fatgao. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“高胖胖的日常 #生活西化” (@fatgao), 205 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fatgao.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.