Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ФК Лида News 📰

Channel

ФК Лида News 📰

@fc_lida_official

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cross-platform identity · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry

511subscribers

+26 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002342383328
TypeChannel
Username@fc_lida_official
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/fc_lida_official

Growth

4855114986 August 2026 — 485 subscribers6 August 2026 — 485 subscribers13 August 2026 — 495 subscribers21 August 2026 — 499 subscribers28 August 2026 — 505 subscribers5 September 2026 — 511 subscribers6 August 20265 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 30 days, net +26. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 481–515 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Sept 2026, 19:39511+6
28 Aug 2026, 23:14505+6
21 Aug 2026, 09:25499+4
13 Aug 2026, 12:18495+10
6 Aug 2026, 18:48485no change
6 Aug 2026, 11:45485first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 13 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

166 reactions across 15 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6941.6%
👍2515.1%
❤‍🔥2213.3%
😢1710.2%
😁63.61%
🥰63.61%
🏆42.41%
👏42.41%
😱42.41%
👌31.81%
😭21.20%
🎃10.602%
💯10.602%
🔥10.602%
😐10.602%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 166 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 06:10 UTC245 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Победа на выезде в столице 🔥 🇧🇾 Первая лига, 18-й тур. «Динамо-Минск-2» 1:2 «Лида» ⚽️ Голы: 0:1 - Дятлов (19’), 0:2 - Вашкевич (38’), 1:2 - Леонтюк (66’)

❤‍🔥6

5 Aug 2026, 10:00 UTC333 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

📍ФК"Лида" изменения в составе команды. Клуб покинул Черняк Кирилл (нападающий), прибыл Зайцев Никита (2008г.р.)

❤‍🔥7👍3

4 Aug 2026, 07:21 UTC≈1,330 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

📍ФК"Лида" покинул защитник Позняк Александр. Также в команде теперь новый вратарь - Василючек Владислав (1994г.р.)

7

1 Aug 2026, 16:52 UTC588 views19 reactionsread 6 August 2026

«Лида» забирает 3 очка на выезде 🏆 Первая лига, 17-й тур. «Островец» 1:3 «Лида» ⚽️ Голы: 0:1 - Полуянов (44’), 0:2 - Чернодаров (54’), 1:2 - Федосенко (61’), 1:3 - Вашкевич (86’)

👍10🥰61👏1😐1

28 Jul 2026, 06:02 UTC864 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

📍Команду ФК"Лида" покинул вратарь Васильев Алексей. Спасибо,что был с нами.

😢9❤‍🔥5🎃1🔥1

27 Jul 2026, 15:18 UTC735 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

📆Ближайшие игры состоятся: 17 тур/ 1 августа/ 18:00 ФК"Островец" - ФК"Лида" 18 тур/ 5 августа/ 19:00 ФК"Динамо-Минск-2" -ФК"Лида" 19 тур/ 9 августа/ 15:00 ФК"Лида" - ФК"Слуцк-2024" 20 тур/ 15 августа/ 18:00 ФК"СКА-1938" - ФК"Лида"

👍1

27 Jul 2026, 08:16 UTC693 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026

🏆 Первая лига, 16-й тур. ФК«Лида» 1:3 ФК«Слоним-2017» ⚽️ Голы: 0:1 - Ткацевич (29’), 0:2 - Калинченко (49’), 1:2 - Дятлов (73’), 1:3 - А. Чуйко (84’) Незабитый пенальти — Вашкевич (45+2’, «Лида», вратарь парировал) ❌ Удаления: Ивановский («Лида», 85’) По итогам 16 тура в турнирной таблице ФК"Лида" на пятой позиции.

😢8👏3😭2

24 Jul 2026, 12:22 UTC≈1,010 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

📍В ФК"Лида" новый нападающий - Вашкевич Дмитрий (2000г.р.) Добро пожаловать в команду!

9😁6

23 Jul 2026, 05:57 UTC845 views18 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

📍В команде ФК"Лида" новый полузащитник - Жестарев Макс (2002г.р.)

10👍6❤‍🔥2

20 Jul 2026, 14:02 UTC858 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Артём Полуянов теперь игрок ФК"Лиды" на правах аренды.

6😱4❤‍🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @fc_lida_official. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

13 Jul 2026, 20:54 UTCAnonymous Poll732 voters

Лучший гол 15-ого тура?

  1. 1-ый гол7%
  2. 2-ой гол5%
  3. 3-ий гол28%
  4. 4-ый гол1%
  5. 5-ый гол8%
  6. 6-ой гол5%
  7. 7-ой гол39%
  8. 8-ой гол5%
  9. 9-ый гол3%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cross-platform identity — Wikidata

A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.

Q2134369 on Wikidata, read 6 September 2026
LabelFC Lida
DescriptionBelarus football club
X / Twitter@fc_lida
YouTubeUCj_2UnhoPA3091vcR8L8VUQ
Official sitehttp://fclida.by/

Referenced elsewhere

This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.

Wikipedia

One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.

List of Belarusian football transfers summer 2026 (en.wikipedia.org)
“…web|title=Роман Железный и Эдуард Коростелёв покинули состав «Лиды»|url=https://t.me/fc_lida_official/666|website=t.me|publisher=[[FC Lida]]|date=9 July…”
read 6 September 2026

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ФК Лида News 📰” (@fc_lida_official), 511 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fc_lida_official.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.