Channel
@fc_volna
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry
2,502subscribers
+41 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002108186967 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @fc_volna |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fc_volna |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Sept 2026, 21:16 | 2,502 | +7 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 11:55 | 2,495 | +4 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 20:05 | 2,491 | +18 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 02:06 | 2,473 | +9 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 07:48 | 2,464 | -7 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 12:17 | 2,471 | -5 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 12:06 | 2,476 | +1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 18:04 | 2,475 | +3 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 00:45 | 2,472 | +9 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:41 | 2,463 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:35 | 2,461 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:21 | 2,461 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
126 reactions across 9 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5454360745091296610 | 32 | 25.4% | |
| ❤🔥 | 13 | 10.3% | |
| ⚡ | 10 | 7.94% | |
| 💯 | 8 | 6.35% | |
| custom 5303040508858244666 | 7 | 5.56% | |
| 😁 | 7 | 5.56% | |
| 👏 | 6 | 4.76% | |
| 😍 | 6 | 4.76% | |
| 🤣 | 5 | 3.97% | |
| custom 5281018785602506041 | 4 | 3.17% | |
| 💘 | 4 | 3.17% | |
| 🤔 | 4 | 3.17% | |
| 🫡 | 4 | 3.17% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 2.38% | |
| 🤗 | 3 | 2.38% | |
| 🤝 | 3 | 2.38% | |
| 👀 | 2 | 1.59% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 1.59% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 0.794% | |
| 😘 | 1 | 0.794% | |
| 1 further kind | 1 | 0.794% |
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 305 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Чтобы я так отдыхал, как они 😅 Денис Кораблёв — о напряжённом матче с «Арсеналом-2», форме команды и эмоциональном «Радии». 📱 Смотреть в ВК
⚡1💘1custom 53030405088582446661custom 54543607450912966101
Прямо сейчас занимаемся в борском манеже, а в обед отправляемся на выезд в Пензу!
custom 54543607450912966109⚡2❤🔥1🫡1😍1🙏1
13 см — это много или мало? 📏
😁7🤣5⚡2custom 52810187856025060412custom 53030405088582446662custom 54543607450912966102👀1👏1
На полную 💯
❤🔥4custom 54543607450912966104💯2🫡2😍2💘1
Арбуз арбуз, привет! Немного фрукта ягоды после тренировки 🍉
💯5👌2👍2❤🔥1🤗1😍1custom 54543607450912966101
🌊 Баланс ⚖️
custom 54543607450912966104⚡2custom 52810187856025060412custom 53030405088582446662❤🔥1👍1💘1🤗1
Традиционный 🥳
👏5🤝3custom 54543607450912966102❤🔥1🎉1😍1
С праздником, Сергей Игоревич! Поздравляем врача ФК «Волна» Еремихина Сергея Игоревича с днём рождения. Спасибо, что всегда на страже нашего здоровья — мы это очень ценим. Желаем семейного благополучия, успехов во всём, крепкого здоровья, ярких побед вместе с «Волной» и неиссякаемого энтузиазма в работе!
custom 54543607450912966106⚡2❤🔥2custom 53030405088582446662🤗1🫡1😘1
Тут есть экстрасенсы 🧙 ? Задача простая: «Угадай, кто?»
🤔4❤🔥3custom 54543607450912966103⚡1👀1💯1
В гостях у «Зенита»! Не питерский, но тоже очень серьёзный соперник 🩵 📆 8 августа ⏰ 16:00 🏟️ «Зенит» 📲 VK Видео Поддержим команду 🤍💙
Парилка прям 🥵
4️⃣8️⃣ кадров сегодняшней тренировки от Дарьи Хахалевой 💥 📷 Смотрим альбом в ВК!
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @fc_volna. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
2 Wikipedia articles name this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ФК "Волна" (Нижегородская область)” (@fc_volna), 2,502 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fc_volna.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.