Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ФК СиндЕкат

Channel

ФК СиндЕкат

@fcsyndekat

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

12,221subscribers

-1,724 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002110843462
TypeChannel
Username@fcsyndekat
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/fcsyndekat

Topic

Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 74% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

11,99514,28613,140.56 August 2026 — 13,945 subscribers6 August 2026 — 13,945 subscribers7 August 2026 — 13,931 subscribers7 August 2026 — 13,932 subscribers9 August 2026 — 13,930 subscribers10 August 2026 — 13,910 subscribers11 August 2026 — 13,901 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13,974 subscribers13 August 2026 — 13,987 subscribers14 August 2026 — 14,003 subscribers16 August 2026 — 14,021 subscribers18 August 2026 — 14,024 subscribers19 August 2026 — 14,031 subscribers20 August 2026 — 14,051 subscribers21 August 2026 — 14,017 subscribers23 August 2026 — 13,976 subscribers24 August 2026 — 14,141 subscribers25 August 2026 — 14,249 subscribers26 August 2026 — 14,286 subscribers27 August 2026 — 12,524 subscribers28 August 2026 — 12,515 subscribers29 August 2026 — 12,531 subscribers30 August 2026 — 12,456 subscribers31 August 2026 — 12,432 subscribers2 September 2026 — 12,404 subscribers3 September 2026 — 12,376 subscribers5 September 2026 — 12,361 subscribers8 September 2026 — 12,248 subscribers11 September 2026 — 12,137 subscribers13 September 2026 — 12,087 subscribers15 September 2026 — 12,039 subscribers16 September 2026 — 11,995 subscribers19 September 2026 — 12,221 subscribers12,2216 August 202619 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 44 days, net -1,724. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,651–14,630 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 11:0112,221+226
16 Sept 2026, 22:4011,995-44
15 Sept 2026, 04:0112,039-48
13 Sept 2026, 11:5512,087-50
11 Sept 2026, 12:1712,137-111
8 Sept 2026, 17:3912,248-113
5 Sept 2026, 07:5612,361-15
3 Sept 2026, 09:2312,376-28
2 Sept 2026, 01:5312,404-28
31 Aug 2026, 22:1612,432-24
30 Aug 2026, 22:3712,456-75
29 Aug 2026, 19:3512,531+16
28 Aug 2026, 21:2812,515-9
27 Aug 2026, 19:4412,524-1,762
26 Aug 2026, 19:5514,286+37
25 Aug 2026, 16:5714,249+108
24 Aug 2026, 20:1514,141+165
23 Aug 2026, 04:3813,976-41
21 Aug 2026, 13:5614,017-34
20 Aug 2026, 14:1614,051first reading

Engagement

245 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 50 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.3%
avg views ÷ 12,221 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,750
104 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.83%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
104
of 245 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held245 (4 August 20262 September 2026)
Views total182,011
Reactions total3,330
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 22:04 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1h 08m
Average length
33s

Measured directly from 126 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

8,591 reactions across 239 posts, in 58 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥2,22125.9%
1,41516.5%
👍6287.31%
😁6277.30%
custom 52313811914326439844915.72%
4705.47%
👏3944.59%
💯3484.05%
custom 52309768718013272503393.95%
🏆3013.50%
🤣2803.26%
😭1471.71%
custom 54273010595571044781171.36%
custom 5305477447532190476981.14%
❤‍🔥971.13%
🙏780.908%
🤝710.826%
💘550.64%
😱540.629%
😍430.501%
38 further kinds3173.69%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 245 of the 245 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,878 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 245 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 245 we hold a reading for · 0.4%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @fcsyndekat. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 245 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
0.816%
2 of 245 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
2
posts carrying an erid · 2 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
2,730
over 2 measured posts
Median views · rest
2,880
over 243 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2SDnjbqBKSB114 August 202614 August 2026
2SDnjdyau7y122 August 202622 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 245 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 13:36 UTC665 views34 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

🤔 Что общего между яхтой Андрея Владимировича и финалом WINLINE Кубка Лиги? ✅ Ответ: Все хотят туда попасть!

😁19💯6🤣6custom 52313811914326439842🔥1

2 Sept 2026, 12:03 UTC790 views17 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @WinlineMLPoll

🔝 ГОЛ ТУРА

  1. ⚽️ Тугарев7%
  2. ⚽️ Муллин8%
  3. 😔 Клён13%
  4. ⚽️ Свят17%
  5. ⚽️ Манна39%
  6. ⚽️ Мазур15%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

custom 52313811914326439841033🔥1

2 Sept 2026, 10:02 UTC979 views30 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

📸 ФОТО С 1 ТУРА 🤩 🤩 🤩

👍15🔥74🤝2❤‍🔥1💘1

2 Sept 2026, 08:54 UTC956 views30 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

💯 Лучшие идеи для челленджей хранятся в умах тренеров вратарей 🔥 Иваныч к каждой тренировке готовит что-то интересное Арапу и Шубе

💯12😁8🔥7💘2👍1

2 Sept 2026, 08:27 UTC925 views31 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥13🤪7😁5custom 523138119143264398432💘1

2 Sept 2026, 06:55 UTC≈1,050 views64 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

👏🏻 Дава оказался в хорошей компании 🔥 — чтобы в ней и оставался

🔥42❤‍🔥10💯5custom 5231381191432643984211💘1😇1

2 Sept 2026, 04:50 UTC≈1,130 views39 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

🔝 Наша версия лучшего момента 1 тура! 🤭 Лассо ещё просмотр не прошёл, а уже позволяет себе кататься на тренере и не отдавать ему пятюню 📱 ДЮБЮТНАЯ ТРЕНЕРСКАЯ БРОВКА СТАНИСЛАВА МОРОЗОВА

🤣27💯6😁41custom 52313811914326439841

1 Sept 2026, 16:12 UTC≈1,200 views29 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

🤩🤩🤩🤩 возвращается! 💥 Собрали для вас БОЛЬШОЙ выпуск в начале нового сезона. Вспомнили победу в Кубке Alma Mater, разобрали первый матч в Кубке Лиги, пообщались с болельщиками на улицах ЕКБ и проанализировали будущих соперников. 🎙️ В студии для вас работали Газдан, Кирилл Василич и Олейник. 📱 ПРИЯТНОГО ПРОСМОТРА

🔥13custom 52313811914326439847❤‍🔥5🏆2👍2

1 Sept 2026, 11:31 UTC≈1,320 views34 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

🤔 Белка: «СиндЕкат спокойно выйдет в плей-офф с третьего места» Согласны с таким прогнозом? 📺 ПОЛНЫЙ ВЫПУСК AGM

15🤔8🔥6custom 52313811914326439845

1 Sept 2026, 09:31 UTC≈1,310 views44 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

🔥ИГРА БЕРЁЗЫ И ГОЛ СВЯТА — В ТОП ЛУЧШИХ МОМЕНТОВ ПРОШЛОЙ НЕДЕЛИ Браво, парни 👏🏻 📺 СМОТРЕТЬ

🔥2110👏8custom 523138119143264398432

1 Sept 2026, 08:02 UTC≈1,320 views46 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

👋 Передаём привет Ольге Юрьевне, маме Златана 😳 Мир настолько тесен, что двое наших юных болельщиков, которые часто приходят на тренировки, оказались её учениками 🎙️ Тёма решил узнать, как парни относятся к его маме

👏26🔥6🤩63custom 52313811914326439843😁2

1 Sept 2026, 05:56 UTC≈1,310 views39 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Эта неделя на Вайбе 👌

🔥237custom 52313811914326439847👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 245 posts we hold for @fcsyndekat. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@fcsyndekat edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
25 August 2026
Most recent edit
25 August 2026

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

2 Sept 2026, 12:03 UTCAnonymous Poll4,400 voters approx.

🔝 ГОЛ ТУРА

  1. ⚽️ Тугарев7%
  2. ⚽️ Муллин8%
  3. 😔 Клён13%
  4. ⚽️ Свят17%
  5. ⚽️ Манна39%
  6. ⚽️ Мазур15%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

30 Aug 2026, 16:16 UTCAnonymous Poll324 voters

Кто звезда мачта в составе ФК СиндЕкат?

  1. GERAS JR23%
  2. СВЯТ59%
  3. ЛАССО12%
  4. CHUVA7%
  5. KATRICH26%
  6. DRUZHINA12%

The shares total 139%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 245 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 28 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ФК «Урал»
@fc_uralEkb · 29,316
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 8 September 2026
ХК «Автомобилист»
@hc_avtomobilist · 57,365
Telegram ranks this channel #96 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 23 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ФК СиндЕкат” (@fcsyndekat), 12,221 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fcsyndekat.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.