Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for FCVR57

Channel

FCVR57

@fcvr57

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,371subscribers

+4 since we began measuring on 14 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001427275275
TypeChannel
Username@fcvr57
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded14 September 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/fcvr57

Growth

1,3671,3711,36914 Sept 2026, 08:22 — 1,367 subscribers15 Sept 2026, 00:01 — 1,371 subscribers14 Sept 2026, 08:2215 Sept 2026, 00:01
2 measurements taken within a single day, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,366–1,372 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 00:011,371+4
14 Sept 2026, 08:221,367first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 10 September 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
42.3%
avg views ÷ 1,371 subscribers
Avg views / post
579
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.54%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 September 2026
Posts held20 (10 September 202614 September 2026)
Views total11,585
Reactions total294
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Sept 2026, 08:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

294 reactions across 20 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
9532.3%
👍4716.0%
😢3712.6%
😁3511.9%
🔥3210.9%
👏196.46%
🤡144.76%
🤔93.06%
🤯31.02%
🤣20.68%
👎10.34%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 294 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 September 2026 to 14 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @fcvr57. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 September 2026 to 14 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

14 Sept 2026, 08:11 UTC109 views4 reactionsread 14 September 2026
Photo

🎙️ Юрій Габовда — про бачення команди на цей сезон ◾️ Я хочу бачити «Верес» більш збалансованим, більш стабільним вже у наших результатах. В нас є вже певний кістяк команди, який сформувався за попередній сезон. Прийшла також нова кров в команду, нові гравці. І «Верес» повинен бути боєздатним, прогресивним. ◾️ Хотілося б у цьому контексті також звернутися до вболівальників. Хочу, щоб «Верес» був для них релігією, щ

👍2🔥2

14 Sept 2026, 05:24 UTC411 views19 reactionsread 14 September 2026
Photo

🔜 «ТаТоТаке»: Іван Надєїн запропонував Роману Солодаренку дві дати для проведення матчу «Верес» - «Кудрівка» 📆 «Кудрівка» отримала пропозицію зіграти в паузі для збірних — 27-го вересня або 3-го жовтня. Клуб взяв час на роздуми. 📸: НК «Верес» 👑 Забирай бездепозитний бонус 1000₴ для ставок в BETKING по промокоду FCVR #FCVR57

🔥124👍2👏1

13 Sept 2026, 14:25 UTC475 views3 reactionsread 14 September 2026
Photo

🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Дербі Манчестеру вже сьогодні! 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Незважаючи на те, що «Сіті» є фаворитом, перемогти «Юнайтед» вдалося лише 1 раз у 6 останніх манчестерських дербі. ❤️ ТМ 3.5 грав у всіх цих матчах, а на полі МЮ в усіх дербі з 2020 року (коефіцієнт 1.62) 👑 Став на матч дня на BETKING! Вводь промокод FCVR та отримай фрібет 1000₴ для ставок.

3

13 Sept 2026, 12:29 UTC523 views21 reactionsread 14 September 2026
Photo

✅🔥 Перша перемога «Вереса» U-21 у сезоні. Рівняни вдома здолали «Кудрівку» U-21 — 3:1. ⚽️ Дубль Антона Видрича та гол Гільєрме Байї. 📸: НК «Верес» #FCVR57

14👏6🔥1

12 Sept 2026, 17:42 UTC644 views12 reactionsread 14 September 2026

🚨 І знову повітряна тривога #FCVR57

😢12

12 Sept 2026, 17:35 UTC695 views18 reactionsread 14 September 2026
Photo

🚨 ОФІЦІЙНО: матч «Верес» - «Кудрівка» перенесено на невизначений термін через затяжну повітряну тривогу ‼️ За нашою інформацією, «Кудрівка» хотіла грати завтра, але «Верес» був проти через матч Кубка України, який рівняни зіграють у середу, 16-го вересня. 📆 Про дату матчу буде повідомлено згодом. #FCVR57

🤡11😢5👍2

12 Sept 2026, 17:28 UTC684 views14 reactionsread 14 September 2026

‼️ Є інформація, що матчу сьогодні не буде… #FCVR57

8🤯3😢2👎1

12 Sept 2026, 17:16 UTC675 views17 reactionsread 14 September 2026

👋 Є ті, хто не втратили надію і готові повернутися на стадіон у разі відбою і продовження матчу? Чи все ж варто було перенести гру на завтра? #FCVR57

17

12 Sept 2026, 14:52 UTC623 views19 reactionsread 14 September 2026
Forwarded from @upl_ua_official

❗️Початок матчу 🔴«Верес» - «Кудрівка»⚪️ відкладено через повітряну тривогу!❗️ 🥰 УПЛ | Підписатись 📷

😢18🔥1

12 Sept 2026, 14:24 UTC699 views11 reactionsread 14 September 2026
Photo

🚨 Стартовий склад «Вереса» на матч проти «Кудрівки» ⏰ 18:00 🏟 стадіон «Авангард», м. Рівне 📡 УПЛ ТБ #FCVR57

10👏1

12 Sept 2026, 14:00 UTC626 views8 reactionsread 14 September 2026

✅ Є відбій повітряної тривоги #FCVR57

5👍3

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @fcvr57. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Usyk. The Cat. Oleksandr
@Usyk17 · 25,321
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 14 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“FCVR57” (@fcvr57), 1,371 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fcvr57.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.