Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Fedhabit

Channel

Fedhabit

@fedhabitTG

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,484subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002489729968
TypeChannel
Username@fedhabitTG
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/fedhabitTG

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 78% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,4771,4901,483.57 August 2026 — 1,487 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,490 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,488 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,486 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,487 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,484 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,483 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,482 subscribers2 September 2026 — 1,477 subscribers8 September 2026 — 1,479 subscribers16 September 2026 — 1,484 subscribers1,4847 August 202616 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 41 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,475–1,492 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 12:381,484+5
8 Sept 2026, 10:171,479+2
2 Sept 2026, 20:131,477-5
30 Aug 2026, 13:251,482-1
27 Aug 2026, 04:381,483-1
20 Aug 2026, 11:121,484-3
17 Aug 2026, 10:131,487+1
13 Aug 2026, 08:251,486-2
10 Aug 2026, 06:341,488-2
7 Aug 2026, 12:221,490+3
7 Aug 2026, 00:011,487first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 23 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 21 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

39 reactions across 21 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1743.6%
1435.9%
🤔37.69%
💯25.13%
🤯25.13%
😁12.56%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 39 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 07:27 UTC≈2,030 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Everyone will watch one number at 6 PM IST: the US jobs report. But a "healthy" 4.2% unemployment rate can hide a weakening job market if people are just giving up looking for work. https://x.com/fedhabit/status/2085628233597292954?s=20

1👍1

6 Aug 2026, 07:31 UTC≈2,630 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

BTC is back at $65K, the same wall it's bounced off for weeks. ETFs are buying. IBIT is buying. And it still can't break through. Tomorrow's US jobs report decides which way it snaps. https://x.com/fedhabit/status/2085266437464363266?s=20

👍1

5 Aug 2026, 09:48 UTC≈2,370 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

India has taxed crypto for four years without deciding what it legally is. Last week a parliamentary committee finally said that's a problem. 30% tax, 1% TDS, 90% of volume offshore. Full breakdown of what the report actually recommends 👇 https://x.com/fedhabit/status/2084939466872074558?s=20

1👍1

5 Aug 2026, 07:07 UTC≈2,390 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

This week isn't really about crypto. It's about US jobs data. That could decide whether BTC gets another shot at $65K or heads back toward $60K. https://x.com/fedhabit/status/2084898685763322063?s=20

4

4 Aug 2026, 13:57 UTC≈3,060 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Ever bought a token everyone was bullish on, but the price still kept falling? The problem may not be demand. It may be supply. If only a small share of tokens is circulating and major unlocks are still ahead, new supply can keep pressuring the price. That’s why market cap alone can mislead. A token may look cheap, while its FDV shows that most of the supply is yet to enter the market. Before buying, check circula

3

4 Aug 2026, 06:25 UTC≈3,260 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

BTC stuck between $60K and $65K for almost a month. Strategy paused buying for 5 weeks. Coldcard hack was $89M not $70M. Jobs report Friday. Jackson Hole August 27. A lot to watch. https://x.com/fedhabit/status/2084526040823844918?s=20

👍2

3 Aug 2026, 14:18 UTC≈2,810 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

$100 bheja but receiver ko $0 mila. Kisi aur ko $10,000 gaya. Ye hai UI level hacking, agar laptop pe koi random file download ki hai toh ho sakta hai script pehle se laptop mei bethi ho! https://www.instagram.com/p/DblLttypPIg/

🤔1

3 Aug 2026, 07:07 UTC≈2,550 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

BTC is back at $62.6K. A major hardware wallet flaw, Friday's jobs report, and historically Bitcoin's weakest month all land at the same time. Wrote about why this week matters. https://x.com/fedhabit/status/2084174034712027537?s=20

👍1

31 Jul 2026, 07:14 UTC≈3,360 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

A green close after 2 red closes for this month. Three exchanges shut down in weeks. Fed's most contested vote in years. Now all we need for August are more buyers and less sellers. https://x.com/fedhabit/status/2083089997750759877

1

30 Jul 2026, 15:01 UTC≈3,500 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

₹10,000 ka trade karo toh actually ₹10,000 nahi lagte. Spread, fees, GST, slippage, sab milake capital pehle hi cut ho jaati hai. Limit orders use karo. https://www.instagram.com/p/Dba9XtkpFaE/

👍1

30 Jul 2026, 11:51 UTC≈3,570 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

June PCE came in softer than expected. Doesn't rule out a September hike. But inflation is no longer moving in the wrong direction. BTC holding $64K. https://x.com/fedhabit/status/2082795985521258988?s=20

🤔2

30 Jul 2026, 07:17 UTC≈1,660 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Fed held rates but three officials voted for a hike. Most contested FOMC vote in years. BTC didn't move. https://x.com/fedhabit/status/2082725564503449914?s=20

👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @fedhabitTG. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Fedhabit” (@fedhabitTG), 1,484 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fedhabitTG.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.