Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for πŸͺΆ π™π™€π™€π™‡π™Ž π™‚π™Šπ™Šπ˜Ώ π™ˆπ˜Όπ™‰

Channel

πŸͺΆ π™π™€π™€π™‡π™Ž π™‚π™Šπ™Šπ˜Ώ π™ˆπ˜Όπ™‰

@feels_77x

On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry

1,936subscribers

-62 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001425363113
TypeChannel
Username@feels_77x
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 β€” estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/feels_77x

Growth

1,9361,9981,9676 August 2026 β€” 1,998 subscribers7 August 2026 β€” 1,998 subscribers10 August 2026 β€” 1,994 subscribers12 August 2026 β€” 1,990 subscribers16 August 2026 β€” 1,980 subscribers18 August 2026 β€” 1,976 subscribers21 August 2026 β€” 1,972 subscribers25 August 2026 β€” 1,966 subscribers28 August 2026 β€” 1,961 subscribers31 August 2026 β€” 1,952 subscribers3 September 2026 β€” 1,949 subscribers8 September 2026 β€” 1,936 subscribers6 August 20268 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 33 days, net -62. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,927–2,007 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Sept 2026, 17:561,936-13
3 Sept 2026, 19:171,949-3
31 Aug 2026, 20:451,952-9
28 Aug 2026, 10:081,961-5
25 Aug 2026, 04:331,966-6
21 Aug 2026, 19:261,972-4
18 Aug 2026, 22:061,976-4
16 Aug 2026, 08:431,980-10
12 Aug 2026, 21:341,990-4
10 Aug 2026, 06:001,994-4
7 Aug 2026, 00:011,998no change
6 Aug 2026, 23:571,998first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 5 June 2023 β€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β€” we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
12s
Average length
6s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β€” not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no β‰ˆ mark.

Reaction mix

197 reactions across 9 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❀8040.6%
🐳2814.2%
πŸ”₯189.14%
⚑168.12%
πŸ“126.09%
🍾84.06%
πŸ‘73.55%
πŸ‘Ύ73.55%
πŸ’―73.55%
πŸ†63.05%
😱52.54%
🌭31.52%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β€” πŸ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β€” 4.34K, 1.2M β€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post β€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β€” those same posts carry 197 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by β€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 June 2023 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Jul 2026, 10:44 UTC572 viewsread 7 August 2026

Appreciate every single one of you that are still here after all these years. The ones who actually know me already get it: honesty and quality were never optional for me on this channel. Market’s a completely different animal since I stepped away in 2022. My old thesis that solid EVM tech alone would carry a token? DEAD WRONG. Going to spend proper time breaking down the higher-volume names on Solana (and maybe BS…

29 Jul 2026, 19:54 UTC631 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

🐸 $NVHOOD is a brand new reflection token on Robinhood that pays you NVIDIA shares for simply holding. No staking. No lockups. No complicated farm. The bigger your bag, the more NVIDIA streams to you. ✍🏻 β€’β€’ 0x7064371727A10F0a67Bd3D987e1e92E291B9757F πŸ“Š β€’β€’ DEX Screener πŸ’¬ β€’β€’ Telegram 🌐 β€’β€’ Website πŸ—„ β€’β€’ X Social

πŸ”₯3

25 Jul 2026, 11:55 UTC649 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

βœ… Staked more rupees on $DEPLOY: another launchpad token on VLAD's network that gives 90% of trading fees to the creators at just ~7K mcap. I connected a burner wallet, used their bridge, and even launched a test shitcoin: everything works fine 🀝 ✍🏻 β€’β€’ 0x01D2b12781769CAc2764807b4b6C00050dFf700A πŸ“Š β€’β€’ https://dexscreener.com/robinhood/0x2386F755D832CDa41707B82a6886b0beD5aFA7f9 🌐 β€’β€’ https://ether.store/create

25 Jul 2026, 11:54 UTC441 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Is worth to keep an eye on the OG $HOOD ticker that is ~69x away from its ATH. Got CTO'd 3 days ago and the new team is pushing it nicely on X. ✍🏻 β€’β€’ 0x5f6CD1cb5c90d733F0e1B540044230225A96836D

24 Jul 2026, 16:52 UTC598 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🐢 Solana has been quiet on the Shiba front for some time, but maybe $YUKI will hit different: IG Story’s clean & familiar, the exact kind of thing that gets CT moving in sync. ✍🏻 β€’β€’β€’ FB44zC6s2jkysjaB2NC8u6XqwhPJwir1DYFzEhXbpump πŸ“Š β€’β€’β€’ https://dexscreener.com/solana/8dxagmtrumcmvpromiswfs26egijwbmoiwfmzneopsqz

23 Jul 2026, 00:59 UTC636 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

πŸ§ƒ $4FUN just quietly slipped a clean 3x. Good Hood tech πŸ«ͺ

Signed π™π™€π™€π™‡π™Ž π™‚π™Šπ™Šπ˜Ώ π™ˆπ˜Όπ™‰

22 Jul 2026, 01:59 UTC619 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🌿 Robinhood L2 is getting flooded with shitcoins right now (the usual wave of noise and quick flips). But there's one underrated launch platform token worth checking, sitting at just 61K mcap πŸ“Š β€’β€’ https://dexscreener.com/robinhood/0x4ef35dc018085a4b485039c831ca48a92b784831 🌐 β€’β€’ https://4.fun/ πŸ«ͺ 0x4d7B52E644D830D47510440477cB50295D9A8148

🌭2πŸ”₯1

Signed π™π™€π™€π™‡π™Ž π™‚π™Šπ™Šπ˜Ώ π™ˆπ˜Όπ™‰

20 Jul 2026, 18:57 UTC622 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

πŸ’· Clean 9x since the $SLIPPY call. Special thanks to @Rimadius for the heads up at $250k mcap πŸ™

Signed π™π™€π™€π™‡π™Ž π™‚π™Šπ™Šπ˜Ώ π™ˆπ˜Όπ™‰

17 Jul 2026, 02:04 UTC273 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

$SLIPPY just made a clean bullish breakout πŸ«ͺ https://www.slippy.club/

🍾1

Signed π™π™€π™€π™‡π™Ž π™‚π™Šπ™Šπ˜Ώ π™ˆπ˜Όπ™‰

16 Jul 2026, 16:01 UTC287 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Aped small on this one since 40% of the early buyers are fresh wallets, but sharing since its supposedly from the Qubit team, which previously did +15M mcap (DYOR) 0xF0568863195770965a6D8abb0aa87F4314b80320

Signed π™π™€π™€π™‡π™Ž π™‚π™Šπ™Šπ˜Ώ π™ˆπ˜Όπ™‰

15 Jul 2026, 20:00 UTC426 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Just helped $MONKEYROCKET dev revamping the logo + banner on DEXscreener. Chart printed a clean bull flag. Already 2x since I posted it, still has plenty of room to run from these levels at 8K mcap. 0x1BD7707c6B48c304DC6B2874BB2ab32A50f510d4

Signed π™π™€π™€π™‡π™Ž π™‚π™Šπ™Šπ˜Ώ π™ˆπ˜Όπ™‰

14 Jul 2026, 23:10 UTC273 viewsread 7 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

Signed π™π™€π™€π™‡π™Ž π™‚π™Šπ™Šπ˜Ώ π™ˆπ˜Όπ™‰

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @feels_77x. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β€” the β€œNamed by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œπŸͺΆ π™π™€π™€π™‡π™Ž π™‚π™Šπ™Šπ˜Ώ π™ˆπ˜Όπ™‰β€ (@feels_77x), 1,936 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/feels_77x.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.