Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Feerique

Channel

Feerique

@feerique_events

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,767subscribers

-193 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001330149215
TypeChannel
Username@feerique_events
Created28 December 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/feerique_events

Topic

Travel — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

7,7677,9727,869.56 August 2026 — 7,960 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,957 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,972 subscribers13 August 2026 — 7,967 subscribers16 August 2026 — 7,970 subscribers19 August 2026 — 7,972 subscribers22 August 2026 — 7,960 subscribers25 August 2026 — 7,966 subscribers28 August 2026 — 7,963 subscribers31 August 2026 — 7,955 subscribers3 September 2026 — 7,945 subscribers8 September 2026 — 7,923 subscribers12 September 2026 — 7,911 subscribers16 September 2026 — 7,906 subscribers30 September 2026 — 7,866 subscribers7 October 2026 — 7,838 subscribers13 October 2026 — 7,844 subscribers15 October 2026 — 7,836 subscribers19 October 2026 — 7,831 subscribers22 October 2026 — 7,828 subscribers25 October 2026 — 7,823 subscribers28 October 2026 — 7,801 subscribers31 October 2026 — 7,787 subscribers2 November 2026 — 7,775 subscribers5 November 2026 — 7,767 subscribers6 August 20265 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 91 days, net -193. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,736–8,003 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 17:467,767-8
2 Nov 2026, 19:117,775-12
31 Oct 2026, 02:107,787-14
28 Oct 2026, 12:477,801-22
25 Oct 2026, 20:577,823-5
22 Oct 2026, 18:577,828-3
19 Oct 2026, 06:317,831-5
15 Oct 2026, 22:487,836-8
13 Oct 2026, 06:407,844+6
7 Oct 2026, 09:417,838-28
30 Sept 2026, 12:397,866-40
16 Sept 2026, 01:207,906-5
12 Sept 2026, 16:227,911-12
8 Sept 2026, 15:597,923-22
3 Sept 2026, 09:377,945-10
31 Aug 2026, 05:047,955-8
28 Aug 2026, 12:527,963-3
25 Aug 2026, 17:087,966+6
22 Aug 2026, 22:367,960-12
19 Aug 2026, 14:027,972first reading

Engagement

25 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 24 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.6%
avg views ÷ 7,767 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,060
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.62%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 25 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026
Posts held25 (4 August 2026 – 3 November 2026)
Views total5,279
Reactions total191
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken5 Nov 2026, 11:55 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 16s
Average length
49s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,076 reactions across 25 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤40237.4%
custom 521335993815533337822320.7%
🔥12311.4%
custom 5215706347508615549827.62%
custom 5228911413438746155716.60%
❤‍🔥656.04%
💅333.07%
🌚272.51%
custom 5229200584996851382252.32%
🤗141.30%
🕊50.465%
😎50.465%
💯10.093%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,076 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 3 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 5 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

3 Nov 2026, 12:42 UTC683 views25 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

правило соблюдать тишину в библиотеке имени Ленина было нарушено — там устроили целый литературный рейв 😄 сейчас зарубежный тренд на переосмысление пространства постепенно перетекает к нам. об этой и других тенденциях уже рассказали в статье 👀

❤12custom 52289114134387461557🔥6

3 Nov 2026, 10:35 UTC≈1,340 views36 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

с первым снегом!! хороший повод, чтобы вспомнить наш февральский проект для Алексея и Маши Руткис фанфакт: в тот день на улицах Питера было сухо, но стоило нам заполнить особняк снегом, как тут же начался снегопад. такие мы волшебники!

❤18custom 521335993815533337810🔥8

2 Nov 2026, 15:37 UTC807 views26 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

ну и красота ужасы в details оторвались после сезона, исполнив все свои грязные (в прямом смысле слова) хотелки в жизнь 💚💚💚

custom 521335993815533337811❤9😎5❤‍🔥1

2 Nov 2026, 13:18 UTC989 views52 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

искренне наш любимый сюжетик:

🔥21custom 521335993815533337818❤13

2 Nov 2026, 13:14 UTC≈1,460 views52 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

DO NOT ENTER OPEN: ЗОНБЕ АПОКАЛИПСИС В ОФИСЕ ФЕЕРИКОВ Стас Ярушин в образе Олега Ленднева тоже заходил 🧟‍♂️🧟‍♂️🧟‍♂️ фото с места событий: Вика Чанг

❤21🔥20custom 521335993815533337811

28 Aug 2026, 08:03 UTC611 views25 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

приятно, что уже государственные клиники подтянулись за нашим трендом на фешн санатории 🧃👠😊🦩🌈🧃👙💗💊🌺👨‍🔬

💅12❤7🔥6

27 Aug 2026, 08:58 UTC853 views42 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

эта история началась там, где не было ничего 🌏 Паша и Катя — та самая пара, которая может сутками шутить, валяться под сериал, а может оказаться посреди Амазонки, на краю мира или в лодке у айсбергов. да, их точка 0 — встреча в Антарктиде, а свадебный день — начало общей системы координат, в которой исчезают внешние ориентиры, стираются часовые пояса и время перестаёт быть линейным. ph: Карина Никитина, Александр …

❤21custom 522891141343874615513custom 52133599381553333786💯1🔥1

26 Aug 2026, 08:24 UTC≈1,020 views76 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

президент Артём Феерикович

custom 521570634750861554934custom 521335993815533337826🔥13❤‍🔥2❤1

25 Aug 2026, 13:18 UTC≈1,130 views36 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

было! если хотите окунуться в прямой репортаж того дня, начните отсюда

❤24custom 522891141343874615512

25 Aug 2026, 13:17 UTC983 views28 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @etosashaaaaVideo

а всем желающим вспомнить этот день и порыдать вместе со мной – посвящается это видео❤️🥹 25 августа 1971 года в этом ЗАГСе поженились мои бабушка с дедушкой. А всего-то через 51 год – мы! время творит удивительные вещи!

❤18❤‍🔥5🕊5

25 Aug 2026, 09:57 UTC≈1,130 views61 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

наша новая коллаба — термостойкая тушь ФЕЕРИК. идеальна для работы над зарубежными проектами или проектами с горящими дедлайнами 👁👁👁👁👁

custom 521335993815533337832💅21❤8

24 Aug 2026, 12:10 UTC≈1,180 views46 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

мы любим годовщины не меньше, чем свадьбы. тут появляется другая фактура — общие истории, семейные шутки, дети, путешествия и десятки деталей, понятные только своим рассказали, как и зачем праздновать любовь спустя годы — тут 💍

❤28custom 522891141343874615513🔥5

Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @feerique_events. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

WEDDYWOOD
@weddywood_ru · 19,015
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 30 September 2026
15 карат
@fifteencarats · 19,712
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 30 September 2026
N:OW
@nowagency · 22,064
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 22 September 2026
ОЙСАШ🚀
@etosashaaaa · 53,147
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 23 August 2026
Павел Недостоев / дилер впечатлений
@pavelnedostoev · 30,298
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 7 September 2026
Event ru – все про ивенты и эвенты
@TheBestOfEventRu · 19,245
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 3 October 2026
Демидов сейчас
@justdemidovit · 45,316
Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 6 September 2026

This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Feerique” (@feerique_events), 7,767 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/feerique_events.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.