Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Наггетсы

Channel

Наггетсы

@feit3nn

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

289subscribers

+39 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002547898407
TypeChannel
Username@feit3nn
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 2 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/feit3nn

Growth

250289269.56 August 2026 — 250 subscribers7 August 2026 — 250 subscribers13 August 2026 — 274 subscribers20 August 2026 — 282 subscribers26 August 2026 — 285 subscribers2 September 2026 — 289 subscribers6 August 20262 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 27 days, net +39. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 244–295 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Sept 2026, 21:03289+4
26 Aug 2026, 11:52285+3
20 Aug 2026, 07:53282+8
13 Aug 2026, 22:49274+24
7 Aug 2026, 02:18250no change
6 Aug 2026, 18:35250first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 28 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

290 reactions across 8 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 13.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54292033435221559723813.1%
custom 52671524879823190003512.1%
custom 53823415781257594153512.1%
custom 54295137794633448623411.7%
custom 53573755173496571733211.0%
custom 5233715712316428507155.17%
custom 5431415255974562006144.83%
custom 5879778046034058694144.83%
custom 5357266725828050588134.48%
custom 5357552109224999676134.48%
custom 5267326614546432606103.45%
custom 523325996474671747682.76%
custom 523114968840040425272.41%
custom 535712774068634919262.07%
custom 526738636183648721951.72%
custom 587996611406201323341.38%
custom 587985681143929666331.03%
custom 523117472376477160310.345%
custom 523127729617373432710.345%
custom 538225316192900425610.345%
1 further kind10.345%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 290 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 28 June 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Aug 2026, 18:30 UTC119 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Мой обопт отдельно 🤩

custom 526715248798231900013custom 58798568114392966633custom 53822531619290042561custom 58795904719273379311

1 Aug 2026, 18:13 UTC437 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Калап адопты с @sobcay_12000

custom 58797780460340586946custom 52671524879823190002

30 Jul 2026, 04:28 UTC543 views35 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Арабская ноч

custom 538234157812575941520custom 58797780460340586948custom 58799661140620132334custom 52671524879823190003

29 Jul 2026, 06:45 UTC218 views35 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 542920334352215597217custom 52671524879823190006custom 54314152559745620065custom 52673863618364872194custom 53823415781257594152custom 52673266145464326061

24 Jul 2026, 17:14 UTC322 views52 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Всем пр, пока что нечего показывать, покажу законченный заказек 🤩

custom 542951377946334486232custom 526715248798231900011custom 53823415781257594158custom 52673266145464326061

18 Jul 2026, 04:06 UTC426 views46 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Закончила комешку для @katrishaSSSS 🤩

custom 542920334352215597221custom 54314152559745620069custom 52673266145464326068custom 53823415781257594155custom 54295137794633448622custom 52673863618364872191

8 Jul 2026, 09:41 UTC407 views32 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Коммишковые рисуются

custom 523371571231642850715custom 52332599647467174768custom 52311496884004042527custom 52311747237647716031custom 52312772961737343271

2 Jul 2026, 21:15 UTC874 views64 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

У меня сегодня дррр Можно мне репосты в подарок? 🤍😜😜

custom 535737551734965717332custom 535726672582805058813custom 535755210922499967613custom 53571277406863491926

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @feit3nn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Наггетсы” (@feit3nn), 289 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/feit3nn.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.