✅ همنشینی همانندی میآورَد دارن هاردی، در کتاب اثرِ مُرَکّب، دربارهی این نکتهی مهم که مجاورت مشابهت میآورَد، چنین میگوید: آدمهایی که از روی عادت با آنها در ارتباط هستید، «گروهِ مرجعِ» شما نامیده میشوند. طبق پژوهشی که روانشناس اجتماعی هاروارد، دکتر دیوید مککلند، انجام داد، «گروهِ مرجعِ» شما در حدود نود و پنج درصد از موفّقیت یا شکستتان را در زندگی تعیین میکند. بیشتر وقتتان را با چه کسانی میگذرانید؟ چه آ…

Channel
قوز فکری و اتاق فکری
@fekrema
On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
9,327subscribers
-88 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001008495510 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @fekrema |
| Created | 10 November 2015 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fekrema |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 77% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Previous handles
Recorded in 2019 as “قوز فکری و اتاق فکر” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 12:15 | 9,327 | -7 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 05:18 | 9,334 | -6 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 10:48 | 9,340 | -8 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 14:13 | 9,348 | -8 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 22:25 | 9,356 | -8 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 19:06 | 9,364 | -3 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 18:37 | 9,367 | -9 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 00:46 | 9,376 | -7 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 02:12 | 9,383 | -12 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 08:27 | 9,395 | -6 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 06:11 | 9,401 | -13 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:30 | 9,414 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:50 | 9,415 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 19:50 | 9,415 | first reading |
Engagement
30 posts held, back to 28 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 32 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 10.7%
- avg views ÷ 9,327 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 996
- 7 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 7
- of 30 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 30 (28 February 2026 – 24 August 2026) |
| Views total | 6,971 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 29 Aug 2026, 06:59 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 14m 32s
- Average length
- 1m 27s
Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
اگر با افراد تنبلی که هیچ علاقهای به مدیریت خردمندانه و موثر پول و سرمایه خود ندارند نشست و برخاست کنیم هرگز در زندگی نمیتوانیم موفق شویم. برعکس اگر خودمان را با افراد موفق و پرانرژی احاطه کنیم و بیشتر وقت خود را با آنها بگذرانیم، ما هم به زودی فردی موفق و پرانرژی خواهیم شد. @fekrema
اجازه ندهید تا کسانی که کار خاصی برایتان انجام نمیدهند قسمت بزرگی از زندگیتان را در کنترل داشته باشند! ویل اسمیت @fekrema
بازدهی بازارها در گرمترین روزهای مرداد بورس ۲۳%+ طلا ۱۲%+ نقره ۱۷%+ اوراق بدهی ۳.۳%+ مسکن ۲.۵%+ و البته دلار ۰.۵%- خودرو داخلی ۲.۵%- خودروی خارجی ۲.۵%- بورس در ماه مرداد برنده بازارها بود. ارزش معاملات خرد روزانه تا رکورد تاریخی ۴۸ هزار میلیارد تومان بالا رفت و بازدهی آن به وضوح از تورم ماهانه فراتر بود عقب ماندگی بورس در کنار رشد قیمتهای جهانی و رشد نرخ دلار در تیر ماه دلیل اقتصادی رشد بورس بود اما هیچیک از ا…
گاهی خوشبختی همین لحظههای ساده است... صدای خنده عزیزان، سلامتی خودت و خانواده، یک فنجان چای، و دلی که آرام است. بیایید امروز برای همین نعمتهای کوچک بزرگترین شکرها را بگوییم 🌸 @fekrema
عادات موفقیت جیم ران @fekrema
Sticker, posted without a caption
پژو ۲۰۷ اتومات چند گرم طلا است؟ @fekrema
اگر روی آسیب و ضرری که به تو رسیده تمرکز کنی رنج خواهی برد ، اما اگر روی درسی که از آن فرا میگیری تمرکز کنی رشد خواهی کرد … ما امروز منتظر یک خبر خوب هستیم 👌🌸 @fekrema
دورِ گردون گر دو روزی بر مرادِ ما نرفت دائماً یکسان نباشد حالِ دوران غم مخور ▫️حافظ @fekrema
Video, posted without a caption
Video, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @fekrema. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@pedarepuldar · 31,340
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 6 September 2026
@IR_filMiRaN · 32,299
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 38 here — alongside 37 others — read 5 September 2026
@agent_ali · 52,445
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 24 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“قوز فکری و اتاق فکری” (@fekrema), 9,327 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fekrema.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.