Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 40% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
7 measurements spanning 35 days, net +85. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 376–488 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Sept 2026, 01:19
474
-1
4 Sept 2026, 13:56
475
+15
27 Aug 2026, 17:34
460
-5
21 Aug 2026, 12:05
465
+32
14 Aug 2026, 13:54
433
+44
8 Aug 2026, 06:02
389
no change
7 Aug 2026, 20:02
389
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
195 reactions across 19 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5217729513328242192
50
25.6%
custom 5217881340422155122
47
24.1%
custom 5217795436781268753
23
11.8%
custom 5217838055741747681
21
10.8%
💘
11
5.64%
custom 5217709193837964976
9
4.62%
custom 5469841628292198945
8
4.10%
🤯
7
3.59%
custom 5366512866998372945
6
3.08%
👍
6
3.08%
🔥
5
2.56%
custom 5411502065308421708
2
1.03%
Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 195 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
172
across the posts below
Posts paid on
9
of 19 we hold a reading for · 47%
Most on one post
100
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ferrrika. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Я просто не могу выхуеть до сих пор ребята спасибо вам большое вообще всем вы мегакрутые
Даже не думала, что весь этот рофл перерастёт в нечто такое!!!!
Вообще до последнего была уверена, что абсолютно ничего не изменится от подобной движухи, но как же я рада убедиться в обратном❤️
Сегодня впервые в моей жизни я настолько искренне смогла испытать радость и прочую бурю эмоций всем своим сердцем!!!
У меня даже голова …
где-то через часик наверное ненадолго подрубимся обсосать, что это ночью вообще было
мне мегахуево от недосыпа я мало поспала эахаэаха но я не могу спать
АХААХАХ ЭТО МЕГАЗАВОЗ Я К БРАТИШКИНУ ПОПАЛА
знали бы как я волновалась ЭТО ПИЗДЕЦ У МЕНЯ ТАКИЕ ЛАДОШКИ ПОТНЫЕ И ДО СИХ ПОР РУКИ ТРЯСУТСЯ
меня там спросили, не 14 ли мне, и все массово прозвали пикмухой ахаххаахах
мы на стриме допрошли Shift At Midnight таки, жаль только что на плохую концовку😳
но всё равно игрулька крутая и интересная, хоть и вызывает у меня обильное попопотение от напряженной атмосферки
спасибки за данный донатик большое!!!
жаль что на стриме не смогла увидеть, ибо ДА в последние дни наотрез отказывается у меня работать😢
и спасибки за дофига подарочных подписочек bomjeglotina😢
https://vt.tiktok.com/ZS494xkdk/
щитпост
я чето вайбанула
текст песни лютая ебанина, но… под данный видеоряд у меня почему-то ассоциации какие-то с временами около лет 5 назад
возможно из-за того, что те времена ассоциируются у меня с такой грязной атмосферкой и вайбом вечной зимы даже если на улице лето в том числе и по музыкальному вкусу
ну и конечно подростковый вайб этот весь прям чувствуется в треке
короче точ…
седня психанула сама отсмотрела фулл стрим, и столько клипов своими руками отклипала вы бы ахуели, я даже количество называть не буду, чтобы у вас глаза не повыкатывались
короче я больше не шучу, конкурса по клипам больше не будет
я просто не вижу смысла в этой движухе, если от этого выпендрежничества лишнего с моей стороны импакта ноль
ни в чью сторону выебываться не буду, сама не рассчитала, что всем похуй на кно…
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @ferrrika. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Сонная Рика” (@ferrrika), 474 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ferrrika.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
