Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
31 measurements spanning 42 days, net -184. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,676–10,916 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 31
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 13:16
10,704
-6
16 Sept 2026, 22:41
10,710
-8
14 Sept 2026, 23:00
10,718
-8
13 Sept 2026, 07:17
10,726
-4
11 Sept 2026, 13:36
10,730
-19
8 Sept 2026, 19:15
10,749
-17
5 Sept 2026, 14:18
10,766
-9
3 Sept 2026, 16:37
10,775
-4
2 Sept 2026, 06:54
10,779
-8
1 Sept 2026, 04:26
10,787
-4
31 Aug 2026, 04:14
10,791
-6
30 Aug 2026, 03:37
10,797
-3
29 Aug 2026, 00:42
10,800
-8
27 Aug 2026, 00:33
10,808
-1
26 Aug 2026, 02:22
10,809
-8
25 Aug 2026, 01:17
10,817
-4
23 Aug 2026, 17:14
10,821
-9
22 Aug 2026, 00:08
10,830
-4
20 Aug 2026, 17:34
10,834
-4
19 Aug 2026, 17:23
10,838
first reading
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 8 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 35 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
3h 09m
Average length
21m 03s
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,774 reactions across 17 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤬
627
35.3%
❤
427
24.1%
💯
327
18.4%
👍
189
10.7%
🤯
56
3.16%
🙏
22
1.24%
👎
21
1.18%
🔥
21
1.18%
🙈
21
1.18%
🤔
16
0.902%
😢
9
0.507%
🤡
8
0.451%
🫡
8
0.451%
👏
7
0.395%
😡
4
0.225%
🙉
4
0.225%
😁
2
0.113%
😭
2
0.113%
💔
1
0.056%
🤝
1
0.056%
1 further kind
1
0.056%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,774 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 8 May 2026 to 16 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 17 we hold a reading for · 12%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ffctaltai22. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 May 2026 to 16 May 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
⚠️ Предлагаем посмотреть очередной выпуск передачи Н.С. Михалкова «Бесогон ТВ»:
«Если караул устал, что дальше?»
о нескольких примерах надгосударственного управления Россией и отсутствия суверенитета России.
💬 Telegram
📺 VK Видео
📺 RUTUBE
📝 Дзен
💬 OK
Валерий Викторович Пякин.
«Вопрос-Ответ» от 11 мая 2026 г.
Поддержка проекта:
💳 4276020655049556
💳 +79130202956
💳 2200300515484598
💳 4585220017169656
💳 5208130011619305
00:00:00 Вступление
00:00:22 Парад Победы 09 мая 2026 г.
01:20:30 Заключение. Книги ВП СССР и ФКТ-Алтай
СМОТРЕТЬ:
🖥 Платформа
📺 YouTube
📺 VK Видео
📝 Дзен
📺 RUTUBE
💬 OK
СЛУШАТЬ:
🔉 Вопрос-Ответ
🔉 Книги ВП СССР
🔉 Книги ВП СССР (Платф…
Подробнее об истории Русского Флага и иерархии государств в мiровой системе государственных флагов читайте в работе ВП СССР:
▶️ 📕 Государственные символы и государственный суверенитет:
💻 Скачать
🇨🇿 Купить (на чешском языке) / Koupit (český)
❗️ МАСЛОВ: Китай достигает успехов в своём развитии исключительно на использовании опыта СССР, а в России власовцы-фашисты-подпиндосники, окопавшиеся в государственном управлении, делают всё, чтобы запретить использование советского опыта, поскольку у них цель не развитая суверенная Россия, а безлюдная Россия — сырьевой придаток Запада.
❗️ СОЛОВЬЁВ/КАЛАШНИКОВ/БАГДАСАРОВ: Победа в Великой Отечественной война стала возможной только благодаря руководству ВКП(б) и коммунистической идеологии советского народа — отказ от успешного опыта СССР — это неизбежная гибель России и русского народа, чего добивается россионская «элита», а использование опыта СССР — это путь к процветанию России и русского народа, чего стараются не допустить все эти власовцы-фашисты…
❗️ БАБАКОВ: Запад рассчитывает на успех в войне против России и уничтожении русского народа только потому, что россионская «элита» и её фронтмен «ЦБ РФ» во главе с Набиуллиной является диверсионно-террористической группой Запада в России, которая под видом проведения управления в интересах России на деле осуществляет уничтожение России и русского народа, чтобы при нападении Запада на Россию Западу не было оказано соп…
❗️ ЕВСТАФЬЕВ: Запад вышел на финишную прямую по прямому вступлению в войну против России и, как показало празднование Дня Победы в России, Запад может остановить только концептуально-определённая суверенная политика России, которая не на словах, а на деле показывает Западу, что тот будет уничтожен, если попытается напасть на Россию, что все расчёты Запада на предательство власовцев-фашистов-подпиндосников в эшелонах …
❗️ СОЛОВЬЁВ: События вокруг празднования Дня Победы проявили во всей очевидности полномасштабное предательство среди генералитета Вооружённых Сил России.
❗️ Концептуальная суть выступления Государя России В.В. Путина на Параде Победы 09 мая 2026 года.
22 июня 1941 года — одна из самых трагических, самых скорбных дат нашей истории. В этом году исполнится 85 лет, как началась Великая Отечественная война.
Нацисты вероломно напали на Советский Союз, планировали захват страны и её богатейших ресурсов, полное уничтожение культуры, нашего исторического наследия и, наконец,…
Новости последних дней:
1. Германия планирует создать сильнейшую армию в Европе к 2039 году.
2. Берлин подал заявку на проведение Олимпийских игр 2036 года.
Пацаны, вы палитесь!
❗️ Какое циничное глумление над воинской культурой, русской армией — власовцы-фашисты-подпиндосники, окопавшиеся на «ташкентском фронте», бьют в спину русской армии, воющей за суверенитет России, стремятся превратить героическую русскую армию в пидорастическую проститутскую версию «Дома-2».
Курсант сделал предложение девушке прямо во время парада в Благовещенске.
https://t.me/rian_ru/338330
⚠️ ФКТ: О сути парада к…
🤬72👎10❤5🤔5💯3🤡3😭2
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @ffctaltai22. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@ffctaltai22 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@rian_ru named in 5 posts, 9 August 2026 – 28 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
ФКТ @fctaltai22 · 27,662 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 10 September 2026
Виктор Ефимов @viktorefimof · 26,443 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 12 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Declared links
One URL this entry has put in its own public description, shown exactly as written there. A declaration, not a verified association — we measured that the description contained this text, and nothing more. It is not a claim that this entry owns, runs or is connected to whatever the link resolves to; a description is text anyone controls, and anyone can put anyone else’s URL into it. How this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ФКТ Пякин Валерий Викторович КОБ ДОТУ” (@ffctaltai22), 10,704 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ffctaltai22.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.