Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for KR.[18+]|| ℂ𝕆𝕄𝕄𝕀𝕊𝕊𝕀𝕆ℕ

Channel

KR.[18+]|| ℂ𝕆𝕄𝕄𝕀𝕊𝕊𝕀𝕆ℕ

@ffix_you

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

150subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003809511448
TypeChannel
Username@ffix_you
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ffix_you

Growth

147152149.58 August 2026 — 152 subscribers9 August 2026 — 151 subscribers17 August 2026 — 149 subscribers24 August 2026 — 147 subscribers31 August 2026 — 148 subscribers9 September 2026 — 150 subscribers1508 August 20269 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 32 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 146–153 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 16:01150+2
31 Aug 2026, 08:16148+1
24 Aug 2026, 16:27147-2
17 Aug 2026, 12:17149-2
9 Aug 2026, 03:53151-1
8 Aug 2026, 21:30152first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

546 reactions across 17 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 520628800821449421011120.3%
💅6812.5%
custom 52989745019738105336311.5%
custom 52988681542885950036111.2%
custom 53011479701739476015710.4%
custom 5364044536408483994488.79%
custom 5411626490510983366448.06%
custom 5208423770896745158376.78%
🌭315.68%
custom 5301072288555225670264.76%

Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 546 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
18
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 17 we hold a reading for · 24%
Most on one post
11
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ffix_you. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 8 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 21:27 UTC12 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

😀🌟🌟🌟🤍🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 Давайте сразу обсудим момент с кожей. Я знаю, что в азиатских странах этот аспект работает от знатности человека, чем светлее, тем он богаче и знатнее. Все-таки я придерживаюсь логики разнообразия рас и подтонов кожи, но загар тоже не отрицаю. Внешность: Сам Хайтам у нас на границе иранца и араба. Я сделала его чуть коренастым, мне кажется, оно к лучшему. Причёску сильно не меняла, разве что пряди выде

custom 52062880082144942102custom 52988681542885950032custom 52989745019738105331

8 Aug 2026, 04:52 UTC65 views33 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Так, всем добрейшего, начинаем наш марафон с Аль-Хайтама. И вот ещё момент, хотела спросить у вас, у кого-нибудь есть ненужный аккаунт в Genshin или же обменный? Я бы хотела вновь попробовать вернуться. Меня совращает идея замейнить Дилюка

💅13custom 52988681542885950039custom 52062880082144942107custom 53640445364084839944

7 Aug 2026, 16:28 UTC88 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Начинаем наши редизайны с ...

  1. Арарона;27%
  2. Аль-Хайтама;61%
  3. Сайно39%

The shares total 127%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

💅2

7 Aug 2026, 13:28 UTC127 views50 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Ребята, я отрисовала своей просто бесподобной подруге арт. Вот ссылка на ее тгк кому интересно: https://t.me/rollypremier Арты дропает красивые, покрас сочный. Все, теперь сажусь за гашню👨‍💻

custom 529897450197381053320custom 520842377089674515811💅9custom 52988681542885950036🌭3custom 53011479701739476011

5 Aug 2026, 21:05 UTC119 views34 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Так, основы намечены. Зелёным я обозначила, что мне нравится в целом, если изменения будут, то некритичные. Желытым обозначены персонажи, которые понесут серьезные изменения в одежде или внешнем виде, а красным выделены те, кто будут отрисованы по моему концепту

💅17custom 52062880082144942109custom 52988681542885950034custom 52989745019738105332custom 53640445364084839942

5 Aug 2026, 19:34 UTC114 views30 reactionsread 8 August 2026

ДУШНИЛОВКА , ИЛИ ТО КАК МОЙ АРТ ИИ ЗАХАВАЛ ИИ - ПРАВКИ БЛЯТЬ!! Мой последний арт скормили иишке, и говорят, что это абсолютно нормально. Я разрешения не давала, желаю тому человеку здоровья побольше и почки здоровые. Он показательно попытался исправить мою работу ИИ промтом. Проблемы в этом человек не видит и считает, что поступил правильно. Не было ни просьбы указать на ошибки , ни просьбы во внешней редак

custom 520628800821449421015custom 52084237708967451588custom 53011479701739476015custom 52988681542885950032

5 Aug 2026, 15:36 UTC92 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Пришлось заметь арт с закрепа на новый в более хорошем качестве

custom 536404453640848399411💅4custom 52084237708967451584custom 53010722885552256703custom 52989745019738105331

5 Aug 2026, 15:25 UTC298 views46 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

ИТАК , та самая гиперпоноценка закончена. На самом деле она самая обычная, даже ниже среднего по моим меркам. Ждала от себя чего-то побольше, но в целом пойдёт. Результатом довольна, это главное. #️⃣Теперь о реально важном. 😀😀😀❤️❤️ ❤️ ❤️ ❤️😀😀 Я буду рисовать, а точнее сказать, перерисовывать, абсолютно всех персонажей Геншина. Большинство изменит свой вид на большую часть своего дизайна, старые персонажи понесут

custom 529886815428859500319custom 520628800821449421013custom 53011479701739476018custom 54116264905109833664💅1custom 53640445364084839941

4 Aug 2026, 08:26 UTC161 views43 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

❤️😀😀😀❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️ Я очень люблю простые дизайны. Вот знаете, хочу затронуть эту тему с вами. Наболело. Вспоминая даже игры, мы видим перед собой ужасную перегруженность в половине аниме гач и всяких крутилок для фанов теть с 5 размером. Обращаясь к измученному и всеми излюбленному геншину, сразу вспоминаю, как раньше было хорошо. Дизайны ранней стадии были охуеными за счет своей читаемости и простоты. Дилюк, Вент

custom 536404453640848399418custom 529886815428859500313🌭8custom 52062880082144942102custom 52989745019738105332

4 Aug 2026, 07:33 UTC107 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @milpidurochkaPhoto

поговаривают, что один из лучших подарков на др художника – репост его работ😱

custom 520628800821449421014

4 Aug 2026, 05:17 UTC131 views47 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Чет я прям могу , выходит даже...6️⃣

custom 520628800821449421022💅10custom 529897450197381053310custom 53011479701739476014custom 53640445364084839941

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @ffix_you. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

7 Aug 2026, 16:28 UTCFinal Results33 voters

Начинаем наши редизайны с ...

  1. Арарона;27%
  2. Аль-Хайтама;61%
  3. Сайно39%

The shares total 127%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 8 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“KR.[18+]|| ℂ𝕆𝕄𝕄𝕀𝕊𝕊𝕀𝕆ℕ” (@ffix_you), 150 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ffix_you.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.