Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 青禾选妃频道

Channel

青禾选妃频道

@fghj9889

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

432subscribers

+11 since we began measuring on 1 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003772610558
TypeChannel
Username@fghj9889
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 31 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded1 September 2026
Last confirmed live11 September 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/fghj9889

Growth

421432426.51 September 2026 — 421 subscribers2 September 2026 — 425 subscribers11 September 2026 — 432 subscribers1 September 202611 September 2026
3 measurements spanning 10 days, net +11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 419–434 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Sept 2026, 14:18432+7
2 Sept 2026, 03:24425+4
1 Sept 2026, 19:45421first reading

Engagement

6 posts held, back to 30 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
20.8%
avg views ÷ 432 subscribers
Avg views / post
89.8
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
6
of 6 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held6 (30 August 20261 September 2026)
Views total539
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken1 Sept 2026, 19:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
42s
Average length
11s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

1 Sept 2026, 10:36 UTC85 viewsread 1 September 2026
Forwarded from @fyd211Photo

5️⃣2️⃣0️⃣ 衣衣❤️ (三上悠亚 ) 主打: 颜值 氛围感 年龄04年 /身高 165cm / 体重45kg / 胸围 B 4T 👋🦶🐻🐬 日本女优的既视感 长的和日本女优一模一样 女优氛围感拉满 声音好听 叫起来酥酥麻麻的 腿又长又白 越看越好看 顶级颜值 偶尔兼职 #上城范珺悦邸 明月

1 Sept 2026, 08:56 UTC81 viewsread 1 September 2026
Forwarded from @fyd211Photo

3️⃣3️⃣3️⃣ 泡泡❤️ (小BBW) 主打: 大🐻妹 年龄 05年 / 身高168cm / 体重60kg / 胸围E 5T 👋🦶🐻🐬🎵 🐻大无脑 🐻超级大 一个手抓不过来 情绪价值高 肤白貌美 小BBW 配合度高 喜欢大熊的无脑冲 皮肤白 🐻推一流 温柔颜值高 #上城范珺悦邸 明月

1 Sept 2026, 08:56 UTC85 viewsread 1 September 2026
Forwarded from @fyd211Photo

7️⃣7️⃣7️⃣ 粥粥❤️ (空姐兼职) 主打:颜值 身材 年龄07 年/ 身高170cm /体重 50kg / 胸围D 4T 👋🦶🐻🐬 南方航空空姐兼职 顶级身材 18岁的御姐 女友式的陪伴 情绪价值拉满 大哥的最爱 配合度高 嘴巴甜 随时拥有顶级头等舱的服务 #上城范珺悦邸 明月

30 Aug 2026, 08:26 UTC103 viewsread 1 September 2026
Forwarded from @fyd211Photo

520号 小米 头牌 萝莉型美女 超级👅王 基本资料: 07年 160cm 🐻B 🉑🐍🉑🦐👅🥚🍭 4T(🐻🐬👋🦶) 果冻毒🐲 无限火力 超级美少女,小萝莉,很好看,本人比视频好看,人见人爱,妹妹非常水嫩,颜值很高,身材好腰细,配合度高高高,情绪价值直接拉满,初恋女友不容错过哦,真的特别好 #上城衍新玉府 仙都

30 Aug 2026, 05:13 UTC97 viewsread 1 September 2026
Forwarded from @fuf065Photo

5号 极品性感女神 99年,身高 164,50kg ,🐻D 5T (👋🦶🐻🐬🦵) 🉑共🐟 🉑蛇🐍 🦞看人 🉑换装🉑丝足🉑双妃 高颜值御姐,真人实拍。胸型挺拔漂亮😻身材丰满,白皮牛奶肌。人照合一,S型身材!温柔性感,配合度高,柔软度好,👍👍沉浸式体验 #仓梦合寓 格

30 Aug 2026, 05:13 UTC88 viewsread 1 September 2026
Forwarded from @fuf065Photo

68号 高颜少萝宝 08年,身高160,体重44kg,🐻B+ 4T(👋🦶🐻🐬🦵)🉑共🐟🉑制服换装🉑丝足。🐍纹海仙🦞看人🉑轻度sm 颜值担当🌟18岁妹妹。保真人实拍,少萝难得,不照骗的更难得!皮肤白嫩,配合度高。冲鸭^~^👍 #仓梦合寓 格

Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @fghj9889. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“青禾选妃频道” (@fghj9889), 432 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fghj9889.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.