Лучший телеграм-канал о фигурном катании от @sportsru!
Наш чат: @figurkachat
📩 Рекламные вопросы: https://clck.ru/3BtbNe.
📲 Дружба/обмены: @feed_back_sportsru_bot
Правила модерации: https://www.sports.ru/football/blogs/2792305.html
№ 4936957515
Created
30 December 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
48 measurements spanning 79 days, net +7,391. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 93,033–102,642 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 48
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
23 Oct 2026, 22:17
101,533
+7
22 Oct 2026, 18:49
101,526
+67
21 Oct 2026, 17:16
101,459
+135
20 Oct 2026, 10:58
101,324
+144
19 Oct 2026, 10:09
101,180
+62
18 Oct 2026, 10:29
101,118
-22
17 Oct 2026, 08:55
101,140
-23
16 Oct 2026, 11:09
101,163
+27
15 Oct 2026, 12:28
101,136
+28
14 Oct 2026, 15:19
101,108
+10
13 Oct 2026, 01:40
101,098
+202
8 Oct 2026, 20:36
100,896
+113
4 Oct 2026, 08:15
100,783
+454
25 Sept 2026, 19:17
100,329
+415
19 Sept 2026, 03:58
99,914
+9
16 Sept 2026, 19:37
99,905
+140
14 Sept 2026, 19:17
99,765
+45
13 Sept 2026, 03:55
99,720
-1
11 Sept 2026, 06:57
99,721
+10
8 Sept 2026, 11:20
99,711
first reading
Engagement
1,197 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 160 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
28.1%
avg views ÷ 101,533 subscribers
Avg views / post
28,500
621 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.48%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
621
of 1,197 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 October 2026
Posts held
1,197 (3 August 2026 – 23 October 2026)
Views total
17,696,070
Reactions total
792,453
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
24 Oct 2026, 03:06 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈32,500
Videos
≈532
Links
≈28,600
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 24 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1h 30m
Average length
1m 09s
Measured directly from 79 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,517,473 reactions across 1,000 posts, in 28 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
940,826
62.0%
🔥
99,190
6.54%
💔
75,793
4.99%
🤣
68,434
4.51%
😁
39,626
2.61%
👍
31,152
2.05%
😭
27,652
1.82%
👎
27,237
1.79%
🙏
25,781
1.70%
😱
20,981
1.38%
🥰
19,367
1.28%
🎉
18,629
1.23%
👏
16,405
1.08%
😐
15,026
0.99%
🤬
14,851
0.979%
🤯
14,725
0.97%
😢
14,142
0.932%
😍
9,350
0.616%
💯
9,327
0.615%
🤔
7,021
0.463%
8 further kinds
21,958
1.45%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1,000 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,517,473 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 26 August 2026 to 23 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
0.1%
1 of 1,000 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
33,500
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
35,100
over 999 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2SDnjcxGo9V
1
30 September 2026
30 September 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 26 August 2026 to 23 October 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
🏆 🇫🇷 Продолжаем следить за Гран-при ISU во Франции
13:30 МУЖЧИНЫ. КП
🇫🇷 Сами Хамми
🇺🇸 Джимми Ма
🇫🇷 Франсуа Пито
🇸🇰 Адам Хагара
🇯🇵 Сота Ямамото
🇺🇸 Джейкоб Санчес
14:14 ВТОРАЯ РАЗМИНКА
🇰🇷 Минкю Со
🇮🇹 Николай Мемола
14:34 🇯🇵 Као Миура
🇪🇪 Александр Селевко
14:47 🇫🇷 Адам Сяо Хим Фа
14:53 🇰🇿 Михаил Шайдоров
🥇15:20 ТАНЦЫ НА ЛЬДУ
16:05 ВТОРАЯ РАЗМИНКА
🇪🇸 София Вал / Асаф Казимов
🇺🇸 Ева Пейт / Логан Бай
🇺🇸 Кристина Каррейра…
ИТОГИ КОРОТКИХ ПРОГРАММ ЖЕНЩИН:
1. Юна Аоки 🇯🇵
2. Анастасия Губанова 🇬🇪
3. Ами Накаи 🇯🇵
Ваши прогнозы на расклад после произвольной? 👇🏻
⛸ Подписывайтесь на наш канал в MAX
🇧🇪 Нина Пиндзарроне
2А на минус, 3F на минус, 3lo+2T
Баллы 63,19 пока только четвертая
⛸ Подписывайтесь на наш канал в MAX
❤208😭89💔24👎11🤣2
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,197 posts we hold for @figureskatingfan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@figureskatingfan edited 20 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
13 August 2026
Most recent edit
16 October 2026
Polls
The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Что включат во время награждения Евгения Семененко?
Гимн AIN39%
Музыку из произвольной23%
Музыку из короткой6%
Что-то из k-pop46%
The shares total 114%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 141%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 125%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 166%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 177%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 26 August 2026 to 23 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 32 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 16 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Evgenia Medvedeva @jmedvedevaj_official · 70,615 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 20 August 2026
Матч! Фигурное катание @figurka_match · 53,427 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 24 August 2026
⛸ Ход коньком / Фигурное катание @SkateGambit · 80,945 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 20 August 2026
Anna Shcherbakova @shch_anna · 123,535 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 13 August 2026
Kamila Valieva @kamilavalieva26official · 148,263 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 12 August 2026
Фигурка @figurka24 · 45,630 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 28 August 2026
Фигурное катание на Первом ⛸ @figureskating_1tv · 71,159 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 21 August 2026
Тулуп Тутберидзе @tuluptut · 38,685 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
Alexandra Trusova @avtrusovaofficial · 238,363 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 11 August 2026
Okko Фигурное катание @okkoskating · 44,368 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 28 August 2026
Московский спорт @MoscowSportOfficial · 44,818 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 27 August 2026
Πέτρ Гуменник @I2358 · 62,432 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 21 August 2026
Голубь Мира Яна Рудковская @doveoftheworld · 60,182 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 22 August 2026
This channel appears in 13 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Referenced elsewhere
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
9 Wikipedia articles name this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
Adeliia Petrosian(en.wikipedia.org) “…Grand Prix Final]].{{Cite web |title=Фигурное катание ⛸ |url=https://t.me/figureskatingfan/35657 |access-date=2026-03-08 |website=Telegram}}…” read 13 September 2026
Alisa Dvoeglazova(en.wikipedia.org) “…competitive season.{{Cite web |title=Фигурное катание ⛸ |url=https://t.me/figureskatingfan/37209 |access-date=2026-06-08 |website=Telegram}}…” read 13 September 2026
Daria Sadkova(en.wikipedia.org) “…name="Фигурное катание ⛸">{{Cite web |title=Фигурное катание ⛸ |url=https://t.me/figureskatingfan/35968 |access-date=2026-03-09 |website=Telegram}}…” read 13 September 2026
Elena Kostyleva(en.wikipedia.org) “…with her temporarily.{{Cite web |title=Фигурное катание ⛸ |url=https://t.me/figureskatingfan/32829 |access-date=2026-04-14 |website=Telegram}}{{refn|<ref…” read 13 September 2026
Makar Ignatov(en.wikipedia.org) “…Таисия Шепталина и Дмитрий Пекин получили нейтральный статус |url=https://t.me/figureskatingfan/38744 |access-date=2026-09-22 |website=Telegram}}…” read 27 September 2026
Maya Khromykh(en.wikipedia.org) “…Russian figure skater. {{Cite web |title=Фигурное катание ⛸ |url=https://t.me/figureskatingfan/35646 |access-date=2026-02-26 |website=Telegram}}…” read 13 September 2026
Petr Gumennik(en.wikipedia.org) “…reddit.com}}{{Cite web |title=Фигурное катание ⛸ |url=https://t.me/figureskatingfan/36651 |access-date=2026-04-04 |website=Telegram}}…” read 13 September 2026
Sofia Akateva(en.wikipedia.org) “…the upcoming season.{{Cite web |title=Фигурное катание ⛸ |url=https://t.me/figureskatingfan/37583 |access-date=2026-08-16 |website=Telegram}}…” read 13 September 2026
Sofia Muravieva(en.wikipedia.org) “…podium by 0.2 points.{{Cite web |title=Фигурное катание ⛸ |url=https://t.me/figureskatingfan/35968 |access-date=2026-03-09 |website=Telegram}}…” read 13 September 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Фигурное катание ⛸” (@figureskatingfan), 101,533 subscribers as measured 23 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/figureskatingfan.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
