Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Clarity

Channel

Clarity

@filet_0_fish

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,979subscribers

+238 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001655892466
TypeChannel
Username@filet_0_fish
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/filet_0_fish

Growth

1,7401,9791,859.57 August 2026 — 1,741 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,741 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,740 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,744 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,747 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,760 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,805 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,842 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,858 subscribers31 August 2026 — 1,861 subscribers3 September 2026 — 1,879 subscribers8 September 2026 — 1,979 subscribers7 August 20268 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 32 days, net +238. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,704–2,015 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Sept 2026, 07:371,979+100
3 Sept 2026, 09:521,879+18
31 Aug 2026, 03:031,861+3
27 Aug 2026, 21:021,858+16
24 Aug 2026, 10:481,842+37
20 Aug 2026, 12:551,805+45
17 Aug 2026, 11:521,760+13
13 Aug 2026, 14:161,747+3
10 Aug 2026, 20:041,744+4
7 Aug 2026, 21:311,740-1
7 Aug 2026, 10:021,741no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:511,741first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 14 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
44s
Average length
44s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

451 reactions across 11 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥16636.8%
🏆9521.1%
7015.5%
custom 5282760583819580244214.66%
214.66%
👌163.55%
custom 5429651785352501917153.33%
🎅132.88%
👍112.44%
💯71.55%
🍓40.887%
🤣40.887%
🎉30.665%
💔20.443%
😍20.443%
🤔10.222%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 451 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 11 we hold a reading for · 18%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @filet_0_fish. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 11 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 July 2026 to 2 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

2 Aug 2026, 16:08 UTC726 views64 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🏆49🔥13😍2

2 Aug 2026, 15:09 UTC747 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🏆104

31 Jul 2026, 16:07 UTC889 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

❌ Поход в мейне окончен. 35 место. Очередной близкий ран. Благодарен за возможность дипранить такие турниры. Идем дальше , скоро должна быть и победа. 👀 На серии еще сыграю 3к 6макс завтра. Апдейты под этим постом.

👌165

30 Jul 2026, 23:33 UTC958 views50 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

💵Прошел во второй день мейн ивента с первого входа и мы уже в деньгах. 🎅День прошел достаточно спокойно и из интересного что “поиграл” с Владимиром Коржиненым. Он на этой серии выступает как настоящий Санта-Клаус. Садится за стол и всегда ставит первой раздачей оллин вслепую. Так произошло и в этот раз , хотя я его просил ,что давайте посидим ,пообщаемся ,не нужно рождественских подарков ,но его было не переубедить

🔥27🎅139🏆1

29 Jul 2026, 19:47 UTC977 views39 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥30🍓4custom 542965178535250191741

29 Jul 2026, 10:16 UTC≈1,040 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥14🏆6custom 54296517853525019175👍1

29 Jul 2026, 10:14 UTC≈1,020 views33 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥18🏆84🎉3

29 Jul 2026, 10:12 UTC969 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

💯6🤣4

28 Jul 2026, 23:04 UTC≈1,160 views72 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

😅 Место занимаю на первой для себя финалке GGMillion$. 🥵 Попал в тяжелый спот для себя на ривере против Дюко Хавена. Изображал он строго Тх флеши из того,что я не бью и иногда у нас дележка против такой же руки как у меня + бью блефы через 7х: 🤫7 / 🫡7 / 🤥7 /😶7 ,редко 7х и без кресты(это очень маловероятно) + частотно могут быть Тх руки,которые пойдут выбивать дележку,потому что я не думаю,что он будет закладывать мн

37🏆219👍2🔥2💯1

27 Jul 2026, 03:19 UTC≈1,180 views84 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

✅ Первая финалка 10к$ GGMillions в моей карьере и ещё в первой онлайн сессии по возвращению с Лас-Вегаса ⏰ Продолжим во вторник в 20:30 по европейскому времени. Будет онлайн трансляция: https://www.youtube.com/@GGPoker/streams - на английском языке ⬇️ И ещё будет на русском, но не нашёл канал,где стримят,поэтому скину позже в комментариях под этим постом. ↗️ Невероятно рад выйти на финалку,но job is not finished

🔥6210custom 542965178535250191764👍2

14 Jul 2026, 02:25 UTC≈1,620 views38 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

❌ It’s what it is. Снова близко ,но не то за чем я тут 45 дней. Но все равно благодарен вселенной за то что получаю такой опыт, такие результаты и дальние проходы. 🙏🏼 Рад заниматься любимым делом и называть это своей профессией. Движемся дальше. ⬇️ В кружке под постом скажу больше мыслей и краткое Саммери по турниру. На серии осталось два турнира 5к турбо / 1к турбо. И расход.

custom 5282760583819580244218👍6💔2🤔1

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @filet_0_fish. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Clarity” (@filet_0_fish), 1,979 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/filet_0_fish.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.