Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Filmly

Channel

Filmly

@filmlylab

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

5,319subscribers

-38 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001749161405
TypeChannel
Username@filmlylab
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/filmlylab

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 62% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

5,3145,4305,3726 August 2026 — 5,357 subscribers6 August 2026 — 5,357 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,361 subscribers10 August 2026 — 5,364 subscribers13 August 2026 — 5,372 subscribers17 August 2026 — 5,378 subscribers20 August 2026 — 5,392 subscribers24 August 2026 — 5,402 subscribers27 August 2026 — 5,408 subscribers30 August 2026 — 5,421 subscribers2 September 2026 — 5,427 subscribers7 September 2026 — 5,430 subscribers12 September 2026 — 5,314 subscribers15 September 2026 — 5,319 subscribers5,3196 August 202615 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 40 days, net -38. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,297–5,447 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 07:395,319+5
12 Sept 2026, 02:415,314-116
7 Sept 2026, 13:565,430+3
2 Sept 2026, 07:175,427+6
30 Aug 2026, 10:385,421+13
27 Aug 2026, 09:045,408+6
24 Aug 2026, 18:175,402+10
20 Aug 2026, 19:125,392+14
17 Aug 2026, 11:045,378+6
13 Aug 2026, 22:385,372+8
10 Aug 2026, 09:415,364+3
7 Aug 2026, 02:115,361+4
6 Aug 2026, 03:365,357no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:025,357first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 17 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
15s
Average length
15s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,112 reactions across 13 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥42438.1%
💩27524.7%
🔥22119.9%
🤩655.85%
🎉464.14%
🤝383.42%
🐳373.33%
🍾40.36%
🕊20.18%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,112 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 17 April 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
11
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 13 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
11
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @filmlylab. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 April 2026 to 30 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

30 Jul 2026, 10:55 UTC≈1,810 views47 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня с 17:00 в нашей лабе на Хлебозаводе №9 делаем вечер плёночного бадди с нашей командой (бэк тоже будет). Мероприятие без заумных и душных лекций для всех, кто хотел попробовать аналоговое хобби, но всё откладывал. Поговорим про плёнку, камеры и кайфуем в кругу опытных плёночных ребят. Обязательно трогаем руками много разных компактов, смотрим в видоискатели и обсуждаем цены на Мью-2. Можно даже недорого попр…

❤‍🔥26🤩11🔥9💩1

18 Jun 2026, 14:29 UTC≈4,180 views108 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Друзья, мы все миллионы потратили на ребрендинг ♥️. Но если вдруг у вас или у ваших друзей котлета жжет карман 💸 , то у меня для вас есть 2 новости: 1. По вашим просьбам мы привезли полтыщи катушек позитива. Да, по космическим ценам. Но я вас предупреждал. 2. Наконец доехали две посылки Базовых и Легендарных компактов. Первая уже на витринах, и там есть из чего выбрать. Все камеры мы проверили и обслужили. В компл…

❤‍🔥55🔥22💩18🤩9🐳4

12 Jun 2026, 14:26 UTC≈4,570 views67 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @mishakepkinPhoto

ну что, пора какие-то итоги подводить, да? 1196 заявок, 3600 фотографий, география от Остина (штат Техас) до Сеула (штат Южная Корея), 622 фотографии идущих людей, 1034 фотографии стоящих людей, эмоции, моменты, красота и беспорядок — всё, наконец, привело нас в эту точку главный приз — 20 000 рублей — улетает автору вот этой фотографии — Елене Малышевой из Москвы Елена, если получится, расскажи в нескольких словах…

❤‍🔥31🔥17💩10🤝9

12 Jun 2026, 14:26 UTC≈3,460 views28 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Итоги конкурса подъехали! Больше 1000 заявок! Миша и судьи просто красавчики! Поздравляем и ждем Елену Малышеву за призом. ПС: Миша, долго не думая, объявил приз зрительских симпатий, заходите проголосовать.

🎉16❤‍🔥7💩3🔥1🤩1

4 Jun 2026, 13:37 UTC≈4,700 views102 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Posted without readable text

❤‍🔥45🐳18💩16🤩13🍾4🔥4🕊2

4 Jun 2026, 09:09 UTC≈5,310 views401 reactions11 Starsread 12 August 2026
Video

Теперь мы Filmly. За 15 лет жизни компании мы меняем название 4 раза — не просто так. Fujifilm → PrintUp → Точка цвета → Filmly Это только кажется, что придумать название легко. На самом деле всё крутое давно придумано и зарегистрировано. Мы перебрали порядка 20 разных версий и остановились на прекрасном Filmly. Что сказали Линии, когда его придумали: Filmly наречие «плёночно» — как slowly или softly. Про способ …

💩211❤‍🔥100🔥48🎉30🤝8🐳4

29 May 2026, 08:24 UTC≈4,400 views66 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня про камеры и ремонт. К лету пытались максимально набить витрину камерами 📷 и запустить в продажу зеркалки. Ничего не успели. Продажу «немыльниц» отложили до лучших времен, а «контейнеровоз» великолепных Мью2 так и не доехал до РФ. Обещают к середине июня, но не факт. Базовый сегмент самых ходовых компактов вообще не задерживается, и его постоянно не хватает. Короче, всё как-то не так и не то, но мы справимся…

❤‍🔥40🔥18🤩6💩2

26 May 2026, 12:55 UTC≈2,840 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Всех бегающих приглашаем на нестандартную пробежку! Уже в эту субботу. Берите плёнку чтобы было максимально хардкорно ))

🐳8💩2🔥2

26 May 2026, 12:55 UTC≈3,480 views44 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @griclothesPhoto

📷 Бежим в гости к соседям! В эту субботу пройдёт необычная пробежка. Мы проведём её вместе с нашими соседями — фотолабораторией «Точка цвета». Ребята подготовят карточки с фотозаданиями, которые нужно будет выполнить прямо во время пробежки! Снимать можно на что угодно: телефон, цифровую мыльницу или даже плёнку. 9:45 — сбор у магазина GRI на Хлебозаводе. 10:10 — брифинг и разминка во дворике у «Точки цвета». 10:3…

🔥25❤‍🔥13🐳3💩3

22 May 2026, 08:06 UTC≈3,610 views55 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Друзья, Москве уже неделю стоит +25, а лето еще даже не наступило. Я вышел из отпуска (это был адовый переезд) и возвращаюсь с новостями. Во-первых, хочу напомнить про OPEN CALL «Все на улицу». Миша у себя в канале пишет: "у нас с вами уже 640 заявок!". Давайте накидаем хотя бы тысячу. Я знаю что вы точно хотите учавствовать, но почему то еще не отправили свои фоточки. Нужно обязательно учавствовать. Во первых чтобы…

❤‍🔥28🔥17🤩6💩4

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @filmlylab. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Фотожир
@photozhir · 21,575
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 23 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Filmly” (@filmlylab), 5,319 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/filmlylab.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.