Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
8 measurements spanning 35 days, net -66. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,365–1,451 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Sept 2026, 11:40
1,375
-66
12 Sept 2026, 05:40
1,441
+2
7 Sept 2026, 23:37
1,439
+2
27 Aug 2026, 11:24
1,437
-1
21 Aug 2026, 04:33
1,438
-2
18 Aug 2026, 08:02
1,440
-1
12 Aug 2026, 07:35
1,441
no change
12 Aug 2026, 03:16
1,441
first reading
Engagement
14 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 00s
Average length
20s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
174 reactions across 13 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
79
45.4%
🔥
56
32.2%
👍
26
14.9%
👏
7
4.02%
🤣
5
2.87%
🤯
1
0.575%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 174 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 14 we hold a reading for · 14%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @filtrovnet. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Отпуск отпуском, но нутрициолога во мне никто не выключал 😂 Особенно на завтраке в отеле. Потому что шведский стол вообще удивительное место. Тут тебе яйца, фрукты, овощи, йогурты, а рядом целая гастрономическая выставка: бекон, сосиски, ветчина, колбасы. И всё это с таким видом, будто именно так и должен начинаться идеальный отпускной день.
И нет, сейчас я не буду отбирать у вас бекон 😁 Я вообще не люблю делить еду…
Мои отпускные «ДА» и «НЕТ»🌴
У каждого, оказывается, свой отпускной устав. Мой примерно такой:
ДА
☕️ кофе, который можно пить полчаса и никуда не спешить
📚 взять с собой книг больше, чем физически возможно прочитать
🏃♀️ проснуться в 5 утра и пойти тренироваться, если именно сегодня мне так хочется
😴 а завтра проспать до неприличия долго
🍽 заказать десерт просто потому, что отпуск
🌧 радоваться дождю, а не считать ег…
Как ввести в рацион разные масла, если я боюсь набрать вес?
Этот вопрос я слышу часто. Действительно масло - довольно калорийный продукт. Но это не повод убирать полезные жиры из рациона. Они нам нужны для здоровья гормональной системы, усвоения витаминов и хорошего состояния кожи и волос ✨
Что тогда делать?
✔️ Выбирайте сыродавленные масла. В них сохраняется больше витаминов, антиоксидантов и полезных жирных кисл…
Наболевший вопрос 👇
Как похудеть, если мне нельзя заниматься спортом?
Похудеть без спорта абсолютно реально 🙌
Ко мне время от времени обращаются клиенты, которым по разным причинам нельзя ходить в зал. Обычно они переживают из-за того, что без физ. нагрузок быстро располнеют. Но все либо удерживают нужный вес, либо худеют 😉
Вес снижается, когда есть дефицит калорий. Создать его можно даже без единого приседания. …
Есть какая-то особая магия в дожде у океана. Никто никуда не бежит. Кофе становится вкуснее. Книга интереснее. А мир как будто сам просит сделать паузу🌧️🤍
Мне недавно попалось видео с 93-летней красоткой, которая ходит на силовые тренировки 🔥
Решила поискать и узнать, кто это и правда ли, что ей 93. Все-таки в соцсетях бывает много фейков. Оказывается, об этой прекрасной даме уже много раз писали разные медиа. Это Эдна Джордано из Канады.
В свои 93 года она четыре раза в неделю ходит в спортзал. Упражняется с гантелями, занимается на беговой дорожке и каждое утро гул…
Я заметила, что отдыхающие обычно делятся на два типа😄
☀️ Первые встают в 6 утра, встречают рассвет, плавают, делают зарядку, проходят 15 тысяч шагов и к завтраку уже прожили маленькую жизнь.
📚 Вторые просыпаются без будильника, неспешно идут на завтрак, потом перемещаются на лежак с книгой и искренне считают, что отпуск создан именно для этого.
И знаете что? Мне кажется, оба варианта абсолютно нормальны. Отдых - …
Маленький эксперимент на 21 день. Каждое утро - несколько минут письма левой рукой и чистка зубов тоже. Говорят, мозгу полезно иногда выходить из привычных сценариев. Не знаю, что там сейчас происходит у моего мозга, но зубная щётка явно решила проверить меня на прочность😂
Делитесь своими странностями 🪄😎
Соки кажутся многим полезными. Ведь это же фрукты и витамин С. Но лично я сама не увлекаюсь соками и не рекомендую пить их каждый день.
✔️ Один стакан сока содержит сахар сразу из 3-5 фруктов. Вы вряд ли съедите столько за один раз. А выпить за день можно хоть 5 стаканов.
✔️ Кислоты и сахар в соке могут плохо влиять на состояние зубной эмали, особенно у детей. Об этом много говорят и пишут детские стоматологи.
✔️ …
❤10👏3🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @filtrovnet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Ksu na samokate @ksunasamokate · 231,470 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 22 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Без фильтров: жизнь и питание” (@filtrovnet), 1,375 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/filtrovnet.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
