FinTaxCoach (SEBI Registered RA) pinned a photo

Channel
FinTaxCoach (SEBI Registered RA)
@fintaxcoach01
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
4,418subscribers
-30 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001866140651 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @fintaxcoach01 |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fintaxcoach01 |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 13:59 | 4,418 | -4 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 19:40 | 4,422 | -6 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 18:38 | 4,428 | +14 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 12:35 | 4,414 | -11 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 18:35 | 4,425 | -3 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 04:07 | 4,428 | -6 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 02:44 | 4,434 | -1 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 10:38 | 4,435 | +4 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 06:42 | 4,431 | -13 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 22:27 | 4,444 | -5 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 19:03 | 4,449 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:10 | 4,451 | +3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:32 | 4,448 | first reading |
Engagement
22 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 22 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
27 reactions across 14 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 8 | 29.6% | |
| ❤ | 7 | 25.9% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 18.5% | |
| 🎉 | 3 | 11.1% | |
| 🙏 | 3 | 11.1% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 3.70% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 27 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Level Up Your Trading & Investing with FTC Inner Premium Community Join our SEBI-registered community (RA-INH000012537) for expert-led strategies: 1. Swing Trading Group : Momentum, IPO, VCP & Smart Money picks (Cash segment only). 2. Value Investing Group : Multibagger research, positional calls & ETF/Mutual Fund insights. 💯 Why Choose Us ? 1. Dedicated WhatsApp support. 2. Greater value : If we miss our Res…
❤1👍1🔥1
🙂↕️
🔥1
Must Read An Eye Opener Post for every Indian : https://x.com/i/status/2084999076366725297
👍1
Captured Good Move In Intraday Itself.
🥰1
PNB HOUSING FINANCE LOOKS GOOD FOR POSITIONAL HOLDING
❤1
GANDHAR OIL 21 EMA RETEST ✅
RBI MAINTAINS REPO RATE UNCHANGED AT 5.25%
Focus On Stocks Close To 52 Week high and ATH Stocks .
FTC SECTOR & BREADTH ANALYSIS Date : 4 AUG 2026 1️⃣ TOP 3 SECTOR-WISE NIFTY 500 STOCKS CLOSE TO 52-Week High. 1. Healthcare 2. Textiles 3. Industrials 2️⃣ TOP 3 INDUSTRIES SHOWING RELATIVE STRENGTH 💪 1. Agro Chemicals 2. Automobile 3. Pharmaceuticals 3️⃣ MARKET BREADTH OVERVIEW (Nifty Universe Analysis ) 📍Moving Average Analysis: • Stocks Trading Above 🔼 200 DMA : 1319 stocks • Stocks Trading Below🔽 2…
❤1
Photo, posted without a caption
👍5
Finally Today Breath Number showing Market is Bottoming out. If Trump don't do any crazy things before This Deepawali we might start New bull run.
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @fintaxcoach01. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@fintaxcoach01 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@joinfingrad · 24,357
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 16 September 2026
@Chart_Wallah · 44,995
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 27 August 2026
@TechnoFunda_Investing · 52,803
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 24 August 2026
@niveyshak1 · 31,605
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 6 September 2026
@FinanceWithSunil · 93,527
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 17 August 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“FinTaxCoach (SEBI Registered RA)” (@fintaxcoach01), 4,418 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fintaxcoach01.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.