Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Календарь Пожарного

Channel

Календарь Пожарного

@firecalendar

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Declared links · Cite this entry

12,629subscribers

+72 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002156103390
TypeChannel
Username@firecalendar
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held49
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/firecalendar

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 58% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

12,55712,64012,598.58 August 2026 — 12,557 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,557 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,559 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,557 subscribers13 August 2026 — 12,567 subscribers14 August 2026 — 12,573 subscribers17 August 2026 — 12,576 subscribers19 August 2026 — 12,580 subscribers21 August 2026 — 12,583 subscribers25 August 2026 — 12,582 subscribers26 August 2026 — 12,583 subscribers27 August 2026 — 12,585 subscribers28 August 2026 — 12,587 subscribers29 August 2026 — 12,586 subscribers30 August 2026 — 12,582 subscribers31 August 2026 — 12,583 subscribers1 September 2026 — 12,585 subscribers2 September 2026 — 12,587 subscribers3 September 2026 — 12,592 subscribers5 September 2026 — 12,596 subscribers9 September 2026 — 12,607 subscribers11 September 2026 — 12,602 subscribers13 September 2026 — 12,599 subscribers14 September 2026 — 12,597 subscribers16 September 2026 — 12,598 subscribers18 September 2026 — 12,604 subscribers24 September 2026 — 12,601 subscribers3 October 2026 — 12,598 subscribers8 October 2026 — 12,607 subscribers12 October 2026 — 12,606 subscribers14 October 2026 — 12,611 subscribers15 October 2026 — 12,609 subscribers16 October 2026 — 12,619 subscribers19 October 2026 — 12,621 subscribers20 October 2026 — 12,631 subscribers21 October 2026 — 12,638 subscribers22 October 2026 — 12,636 subscribers23 October 2026 — 12,635 subscribers24 October 2026 — 12,636 subscribers25 October 2026 — 12,634 subscribers26 October 2026 — 12,639 subscribers27 October 2026 — 12,640 subscribers28 October 2026 — 12,637 subscribers29 October 2026 — 12,636 subscribers31 October 2026 — 12,632 subscribers1 November 2026 — 12,633 subscribers2 November 2026 — 12,636 subscribers3 November 2026 — 12,633 subscribers5 November 2026 — 12,629 subscribers12,6298 August 20265 November 2026
49 measurements spanning 89 days, net +72. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,545–12,652 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 49
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 12:1712,629-4
3 Nov 2026, 16:0812,633-3
2 Nov 2026, 19:1812,636+3
1 Nov 2026, 19:0812,633+1
31 Oct 2026, 17:5912,632-4
29 Oct 2026, 12:3612,636-1
28 Oct 2026, 09:3712,637-3
27 Oct 2026, 11:4712,640+1
26 Oct 2026, 14:5612,639+5
25 Oct 2026, 14:4712,634-2
24 Oct 2026, 16:5112,636+1
23 Oct 2026, 15:1812,635-1
22 Oct 2026, 15:3412,636-2
21 Oct 2026, 12:3012,638+7
20 Oct 2026, 08:1612,631+10
19 Oct 2026, 06:5712,621+2
16 Oct 2026, 15:3912,619+10
15 Oct 2026, 12:5412,609-2
14 Oct 2026, 09:4012,611+5
12 Oct 2026, 18:4712,606first reading

Engagement

57 posts held, back to 9 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 55 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.3%
avg views ÷ 12,629 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,180
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.483%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 57 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 14 of 15 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held57 (9 July 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total32,728
Reactions total146
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken5 Nov 2026, 08:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 09s
Average length
9s

Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

563 reactions across 55 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍33259.0%
🔥13023.1%
👎396.93%
❤‍🔥315.51%
🤝213.73%
👏30.533%
✍20.355%
🙏20.355%
🤡20.355%
🫡10.178%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 55 of the 57 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 563 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 57 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
1.75%
1 of 57 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
115
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
2,570
over 55 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2W5zFHosQPU15 November 20265 November 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 57 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 5 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 15 posts held from the last 30 days (13.3%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 08:01 UTC115 views1 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Advertisementerid 2W5zFHosQPUPhoto

Если в девять лет отец спрашивает ребёнка, как прошёл день, в пятнадцать они чаще близки. В американском исследовании почти трёх тысяч семей этот вопрос весил больше, чем совместный спорт и помощь с уроками Исследование разобрал Тарас Бубырь в канале «Отец в деле». Ему 43, сыновьям 7 и 9. Сам он катается на шоссейнике и учится на шкипера, а в канале пишет, как пытается затащить в это сыновей, пока им ещё интересно с…

👍1

2 Nov 2026, 14:33 UTC≈1,070 views7 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

🔥️️️️️️ ИИ-помощник скоро вернется в приложение и на сайт, став более полезным.

👍5👏1🔥1

22 Oct 2026, 09:27 UTC≈3,280 views3 reactionsread 5 November 2026

🔥 Версия 192 • Радиус безводного района по всем меткам исправных водоисточников как на сайте. • В картах при обновлении слоя появился выбор способа обновления 📱 RuStore 📱 Google Play 📱 App Store 📱 AppGallery 🤖 .apk файл (!) Обновление может выходить не сразу на разных платформах, а с задержкой до нескольких дней. 📲 Календарь Пожарного в MAX #обновление @firecalendar

🔥2👍1

19 Oct 2026, 18:31 UTC≈3,260 views7 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

🔥 Сейчас у совместного редактирования слоя в карте 2.0 есть один большой недостаток: если слой отредактировал один пользователь, а затем другой, метки первого просто затрутся. Полностью это можно починить только переделкой формата хранения меток и слоёв — оставляю на карты 3.0. А пока добавил второй способ обновления. Теперь при нажатии «Обновить у всех» есть выбор: 1) «Полностью заменить слой» — работает как раньш…

👍5✍2

19 Oct 2026, 12:36 UTC≈2,300 views15 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

🔥️️️️ Еще скоро добавлю выгрузку отчетов в Excel на сайте. Возможно успею до конца отчетного периода сделать так чтобы готовые отчеты можно было сразу выгружать сразу посчитанные. Останется только шапку заполнить 👍️️️️️️

👍10🔥3🙏2

19 Oct 2026, 06:06 UTC≈2,190 views13 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

🔥️️️️ Добавил в приложение радиус безводного района по всем меткам исправных водоисточников как на сайте. В следующем обновлении будет.

🔥8👍5

16 Oct 2026, 05:10 UTC≈2,400 views4 reactionsread 5 November 2026

🔥 Версия 191 • Исправлена проблема с расчетом отпуска на 2027 год. 📱 RuStore 📱 Google Play 📱 App Store 📱 AppGallery 🤖 .apk файл (!) Обновление может выходить не сразу на разных платформах, а с задержкой до нескольких дней. 📲 Календарь Пожарного в MAX #обновление @firecalendar

👍4

13 Oct 2026, 11:42 UTC≈2,570 views7 reactionsread 5 November 2026

В приложении есть ошибка при загрузке производственного календаря, из-за чего мог неправильно рассчитываться отпуск на следующий год. Уже исправил. В следующем обновлении будет работать нормально 👍️️️️️️

👍6🔥1

12 Oct 2026, 07:02 UTC≈3,050 views5 reactionsread 5 November 2026

🔥 Версия 190 • В картах в базе водоисточников появилась возможность делать слои доступными только определенным пользователям • В картах появился новый тип метки "Объект повышенного ранга" • В локаторе ближайших водоисточников появился фон - векторная карта для более понятного ориентирования на местности 📱 RuStore 📱 Google Play 📱 App Store 📱 AppGallery 🤖 .apk файл (!) Обновление может выходить не сразу на разны…

🔥4👍1

11 Oct 2026, 06:11 UTC≈2,550 views19 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

🔥 В локатор ближайших ППВ добавил карту на фон для более простого ориентирования. Будет в следующем обновлении.

🔥15👍4

10 Oct 2026, 06:11 UTC≈2,190 views7 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

🔥️️️️️️ Добавил возможность делать слои в Картах 2.0 скрытыми. Можно будет добавить (или изменить существующий) слой, который виден только определенному списку пользователей. Слои которые есть в базе сейчас доступны все пользователям. Будет в следующем обновлении.

🔥4👍3

Showing the 12 most recent of 57 posts we hold for @firecalendar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 7 posts on @firecalendar as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
18 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
5 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
2 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
2

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Артём Чехович | ПОЖАРНЫЙ
@artem0limp95 · 23,995
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 16 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Календарь Пожарного” (@firecalendar), 12,629 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/firecalendar.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.