Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ⁶⁷

Channel

⁶⁷

@fischerr_67

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

221subscribers

+12 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003934572185
TypeChannel
Username@fischerr_67
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 4 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/fischerr_67

Growth

2092332216 August 2026 — 209 subscribers7 August 2026 — 209 subscribers14 August 2026 — 223 subscribers22 August 2026 — 233 subscribers28 August 2026 — 226 subscribers6 September 2026 — 221 subscribers6 August 20266 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 31 days, net +12. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 205–237 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Sept 2026, 14:39221-5
28 Aug 2026, 18:14226-7
22 Aug 2026, 05:45233+10
14 Aug 2026, 10:49223+14
7 Aug 2026, 03:46209no change
6 Aug 2026, 23:31209first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

255 reactions across 12 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 51881606005255443148734.1%
custom 52156159255621350898633.7%
custom 58731450059162980708232.2%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 255 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 18 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @fischerr_67. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 02:13 UTC13 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

пойду в кф, обещаю быть не активным 67 слов в месяц.

custom 52156159255621350891

6 Aug 2026, 22:07 UTC49 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

я не думаю, что мораль универсальна. для меня это скорее продукт культуры, воспитания, среды и времени, в котором живёт человек. то, что в одной стране считается правильным и достойным уважения, в другой может восприниматься как что-то совершенно неприемлемое. если бы мораль была действительно универсальной, люди по всему миру и во все эпохи одинаково отвечали бы на вопросы о добре и зле. но история показывает обратн

custom 58731450059162980707custom 51881606005255443143custom 52156159255621350893

6 Aug 2026, 20:44 UTC64 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026

является ли мораль универсальной или это лишь продукт культуры?

custom 52156159255621350898custom 58731450059162980707custom 51881606005255443146

6 Aug 2026, 20:44 UTC62 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 51881606005255443143custom 52156159255621350891custom 58731450059162980701

5 Aug 2026, 19:35 UTC110 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 52156159255621350895custom 58731450059162980702

5 Aug 2026, 19:35 UTC110 views32 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Fischer 🤩 Leffe Тот самый человек, с которым всегда интересно. Он легко находит общий язык с людьми, умеет удивлять и делает даже обычные моменты особенными. На вкус это мягкая, благородная классика с характером — уверенная, но совсем не скучная. Он не пытается быть в центре внимания, но почему-то именно к нему тянутся люди. С ним легко смеяться, разговаривать до поздней ночи и просто быть собой. Он знает, как остав

custom 518816060052554431414custom 52156159255621350899custom 58731450059162980709

5 Aug 2026, 18:14 UTC112 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🎁колесо фортуны! давайте сыграем? правила очень простые: 1. — в комментариях напишите свободную цифру по порядку. 2. — первый участник пишет 1, второй — 2, третий — 3, и так далее. повторять уже занятые цифры нельзя. 🤍через 10 минут после публикации этого поста я запущу колесо фортуны. цифра, на которой остановится колесо, станет победителем, а её владелец получит подарочек. 🎁 колесо будет крутиться 5 раз, а

custom 58731450059162980704

5 Aug 2026, 16:32 UTC139 views31 reactions2 Starsread 7 August 2026

пришёл к вам с жалобой. просыпаюсь утром… смотрю — на мне сидит комар. и знаете, что он сделал? взял и укусил меня. вы вообще представляете? мир окончательно прогнил. я просто в шоке. как он вообще посмел меня укусить? ладно. думаю, пусть живёт. сжалился над ним. подарил второй шанс. и что вы думаете? этот наглец взял… и укусил меня ещё раз. ну всё. после этого он резко перестал существовать. чтоб жизнь малиной не к

custom 518816060052554431415custom 52156159255621350899custom 58731450059162980707

5 Aug 2026, 06:38 UTC133 views39 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

— пусть думают что хотят. пусть ненавидят, пусть обсуждают. не объясняйся, не извиняйся и не пытайся что-то исправить. люди, которые готовы осудить тебя, всё равно найдут для этого повод. они не стоят твоих переживаний.

custom 587314500591629807016custom 521561592556213508912custom 518816060052554431411

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @fischerr_67. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“⁶⁷” (@fischerr_67), 221 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fischerr_67.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.