3 measurements spanning 8 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 703–705 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
2 Sept 2026, 07:42
703
-2
25 Aug 2026, 09:08
705
no change
25 Aug 2026, 04:30
705
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 15 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
13.0%
avg views ÷ 703 subscribers
Avg views / post
91.6
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.39%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 18 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 August 2026
Posts held
18 (15 August 2026 – 23 August 2026)
Views total
1,648
Reactions total
30
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
25 Aug 2026, 04:30 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
30 reactions across 7 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
12
40.0%
🔥
12
40.0%
❤
6
20.0%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 30 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 15 August 2026 to 23 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Мы это сделали! Сын поступил в МГТУ им. Баумана!
Друзья, сегодня я хочу сказать слова, которые давно просились наружу. Я много писала про поступление своих учеников в этом учебном году — радовалась, гордилась, переживала вместе с ними. Но про сына, тоже моего выпускника, я до сих пор ни слова не сказала.
А ведь это огромное событие для нашей семьи.
Мы сделали это. Он поступил в МГТУ им. Н.Э. Баумана. Это не просто…
Самые лёгкие задания ЕГЭ по физике: почему даже они требуют системного подхода?
Знаете, я часто вижу, как онлайн-школы и преподаватели пишут про «самые лёгкие задания ЕГЭ». Мол, выучил их — и баллы в кармане. И я тоже сейчас перечислю их. Но хочу сразу предупредить: даже эти «лёгкие» задания не решаются на пустом месте.
В ЕГЭ по физике есть номера, которые действительно проще остальных. Вот они:
1, 2, 7, 8, 12, 13…
Что нас ждёт в конце августа?
Важная информация для тех, кто сдаёт ОГЭ и ЕГЭ по физике в 2027 году
Друзья, август подходит к концу, и это значит, что скоро начнётся самый важный этап для всех, кто готовится к экзаменам. Этот пост будет особенно полезен для ребят, которые планируют сдавать ОГЭ и ЕГЭ по физике в 2027 году, и для их родителей.
➡️ Демоверсии ОГЭ и ЕГЭ по физике
В конце августа мы увидим долгожданные…
🙃🫥🤭🙂🙃 викторины
✅ 5 правильных ответов –
Поздравляю! Вы настоящий знаток туманов. Вы не только знаете теорию, но и понимаете, как она работает в жизни. Так держать!
✅ 4 правильных ответа – Отлично! Вы очень внимательно прочитали статью и запомнили главное. Всего один шаг до идеала – перечитайте раздел про точку росы или про рассеяние света.
✅ 3 правильных ответа – Хороший результат, но есть куда расти. Возможно, ва…
Каждое лето наша семья отправляется в дорогу на машине – будь то визит к родственникам или настоящее приключение в другой регион страны. Это лето – не исключение. Мы всегда выезжаем затемно, около трёх часов утра, чтобы поймать весь световой день и не ехать в темноте. Но утренние часы преподносят сюрпризы: частенько нас встречает густой туман, который стелется над трассой, скрывает обочину и превращает фары в размыты…
«Ой, а можно мы сейчас запишемся, а начнём заниматься после осенних каникул?»
Или ещё лучше: «Запишемся после Нового года, успеем же подготовиться к ОГЭ за полгода?».
Я слышу это каждый год. И каждый год меня это поражает.
Понимаете, моя программа подготовки к ОГЭ по физике рассчитана на полный учебный год. С сентября по май. Не 7 месяцев, не 6, не 4. А именно 9.
Почему?
Потому что за 9 месяцев мы не просто «про…
Signed Марина Степанова |Физика|ОГЭ|ЕГЭ
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @fizika_stepanova. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 7 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 15 August 2026 to 23 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Макс Кораблев | Физика ОГЭ 2027 | Физика - она везде | Умскул @physicsisanywhere · 52,980 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Физика ЕГЭ/ОГЭ | Марина Михайловна Степанова” (@fizika_stepanova), 703 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fizika_stepanova.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
