描述:#西湖国际 #黑平台 #杀猪盘 后面拖了一个月找客服就是一直说ag平台审核,不给我出款,最后面直接账号密码都无法登陆西湖国际给平台,玩了半年输了几十万,最近一个月充2万打到13万提现1万3就说审核,

Channel
全网黑平台|骗子曝光
@fjhcjl1
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,104subscribers
-6,669 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003724814655 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @fjhcjl1 |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 31 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fjhcjl1 |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 63% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 06:55 | 1,104 | -42 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 08:55 | 1,146 | -61 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 02:19 | 1,207 | -17 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 13:23 | 1,224 | -15 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 13:03 | 1,239 | -387 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 02:49 | 1,626 | -33 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 22:25 | 1,659 | -671 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 19:42 | 2,330 | -1,275 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 21:08 | 3,605 | -2,677 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 22:49 | 6,282 | -128 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 04:01 | 6,410 | -993 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:16 | 7,403 | -370 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:01 | 7,773 | first reading |
Engagement
37 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 37 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 1m 23s
- Average length
- 42s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 37 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 37 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
描述:WS群发 收钱了没发 一个点击都没有 谎称风控 。 金额:151U
描述:曝光一下骗子公司,代发内容做假,数据做假,然后最后申请退款100u都不退,还把我拉黑账号封禁,在这个台子上要先充值才可以发,只有测试的时候才会敷衍你一下,给你用真的,所以请规避这种骗子 金额:100U
描述:给我上了10张卡全是别人用过的废卡,后面信息直接不回 金额:55u
描述:打预付过去就被拉黑 金额:40U
描述:购买巴西IP,巴西六段苹果商业30个,几十U也骗,穷疯了 金额:48
描述:两个人同伙 给我上个70个协议号马上就死了,几十U也骗,穷疯了 金额:95U
描述:#黑平台 #德信贵宾会 #杀猪盘 充100u裸打,赢110u都不给出款,只给出本金,大家都不要相信
描述:卖卡卖帐号做假不发货 金额:68u
描述:云端监听 不要充开始啥都正常买号花了55U后面说托管让他帮我又话140U第一天给我上号了后面一直不给我开私聊也不说话装死还说换客服了 金额:
❤1
描述:这个老傻子换名字换位置 金额:90
描述:#UU娱乐 #黑平台 #杀猪盘 充值了2000打到2546直接给黑掉 大家注意 黑台
Showing the 12 most recent of 37 posts we hold for @fjhcjl1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“全网黑平台|骗子曝光” (@fjhcjl1), 1,104 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fjhcjl1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.