【花名】:#宣宣 【位置】:#开福区 【价格】:#700p #pp 【身材】:165 48 【年龄】:18 【电报】 : @jjuu89 #老鸡 之前叫 #璇璇 ,见评论区
❤1

Channel
@fk0731
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Cite this entry
85,488subscribers
+54,113 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003603527904 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @fk0731 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 58 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fk0731 |
Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 67% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 09:56 | 85,488 | +891 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 07:39 | 84,597 | +525 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 04:01 | 84,072 | +604 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 06:50 | 83,468 | +713 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 08:11 | 82,755 | +506 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 10:08 | 82,249 | +820 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 08:59 | 81,429 | +521 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 10:19 | 80,908 | +904 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 07:48 | 80,004 | +823 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 08:09 | 79,181 | +427 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 11:31 | 78,754 | +696 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 11:10 | 78,058 | +720 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 12:49 | 77,338 | +423 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 14:45 | 76,915 | +529 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 16:19 | 76,386 | +588 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 14:12 | 75,798 | +893 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 09:38 | 74,905 | +619 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 10:30 | 74,286 | +903 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 07:55 | 73,383 | +898 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 06:27 | 72,485 | first reading |
920 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 186 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 61 of 361 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 920 (7 August 2026 – 4 November 2026) |
| Views total | 130,129 |
| Reactions total | 45 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Nov 2026, 05:08 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 532 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
140 reactions across 109 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 81 | 57.9% | |
| 👍 | 22 | 15.7% | |
| 👎 | 13 | 9.29% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 4.29% | |
| 😱 | 4 | 2.86% | |
| 🤮 | 3 | 2.14% | |
| 🍌 | 2 | 1.43% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 1.43% | |
| 🤨 | 2 | 1.43% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.714% | |
| 👻 | 1 | 0.714% | |
| 💔 | 1 | 0.714% | |
| 💩 | 1 | 0.714% | |
| 🤡 | 1 | 0.714% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 177 of the 920 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 140 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 920 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 373 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
【花名】:#宣宣 【位置】:#开福区 【价格】:#700p #pp 【身材】:165 48 【年龄】:18 【电报】 : @jjuu89 #老鸡 之前叫 #璇璇 ,见评论区
❤1
【花名】:#小妍 【位置】:#雨花区 【价格】:#600p #1100pp 【身材】:160 【年龄】:19 【电报】 : @xiaoyan886886
长沙总榜(每日更新) pinned «【1天内活跃妹子 377人】 小汐汐 张柏芝 司小礼 酱酱紫 梦瑶 萝婷宝 哆哆 小伊伊 红橙子 婷婷 艺涵 舒涵 汐汐 小妖精 小瑶瑶 沐沐 nannan520f lingling55001 吹箫箫 小鱼笑笑 幺妹 haodeba7 巧巧 宇儿 小S 舒瑶 前妻 小敏 秋雯雯 麦迪哪 悄悄 苏言 月亮 麦麦 瑶瑶 水姐 茸茸 晓奶兔 优乐美 怡宝 …»
【1天内活跃(续)】 茉莉香 桃桃 苏巧心 圈圈 洁儿 小伍 塔米 奶优 情书 蛋卷卷 薰衣草 晴晴 音柔柔
【1天内活跃(续)】 安吉 yibao88866 卿卿 小高 施施 软小软 岁岁 胡多多 点点 yue32190 露小露 enenshineinv 香香 楠木木 菲菲 吖吖 小贝贝 chen52100 leledehao11 萍妹妹 欣心 小番茄 C蕊 alan12313 柠檬 章子怡 小玉玉 沙沙 菲儿 在在 duebxc mz20030315 yuhana88 老板娘 林美 茶茶 nn15816 灵宝 小湿妹 小妖 姜艺恩 玫瑰 李倩 labixiaoxing520 奶茶妹 ecooke2612 晴子 萱萱 糖糖 乐伊 绾惑 小甜甜 小琪琪 yiuyiu8200 沈清婉 韩欣 晓晓 烟烟 烟火 小懒猫…
【1天内活跃(续)】 小梅 doongtian1989 希希 tutu88288 纯宝 dingd123123 沈颜颜 婉若 晗晗 小依 s姬月 小澜 小白菜 小甜心 taomeili8 糖甜甜 鱼姐姐 晨晨 歪歪 葡萄 beibei0012 圆圆 希瑶 hs798hs 奈奈 小七 雪梨 晓梦 雪碧 小奶糖 玉雪儿 小萱萱 郁涵 溜溜 bw5168 囡囡 艾薇儿 彤宝 cs_sisibb 耶耶 雪莉 苏珊 桐桐儿 木子 鱼糯糯 诗婉 晓瑶瑶 倩儿 wan1918 CC妹 欧阳娜娜 李艺冉 清清 小胖墩 冯小七 猜猜 芷涵 晓菲 灵娜 李汪洋 薇薇 小汤圆 米娅 shgzbhzu a2169…
【1天内活跃(续)】 大奶牛 大泡泡 妮妮 汐兮 小雪儿 赵雅茹 潇潇 苏萌萌 玲玲 嘉妮 幺玲玲 西西 呦呦 小莹 azzz111b 糖果 熊熊 甜馨 土豆 小困包 花倩倩 mnm939393 笙笙 诺浠 李师师 小胶囊 夏夏 东京听雪 maryguerrero8958 洛丽塔 图图 miaomiaobb2025 浅浅 小清新 梦萌 小糯米 茉莉花 响响 小朵 辛西娅 小吟儿 小漫 安安 小倩倩 乌莎 李佳宁 小艾 娅米 youyou542 林诗诗 南兮 睡不醒 az82ybz 彬彬 香兮兮 饱饱 好孩纸 小咕咪 若兮 兮兮 咖啡 密桃桃SM 果子 初柒 小星儿 奶芙芙 xiao…
【1天内活跃(续)】 奶糕BB 甜辣椒 椰子 feifei07310 十七 皮皮 小乐乐 小兔兔 爱颜儿 mm5208889 小谷包 kk zihan168168 晚晚 香奈儿 思彤 李清清 何小小 萍姐 玲珑玉 衣衣 娜小娜 桃桃丸 啊娇 芯芯 娟子 雅思 呆小布 碧嫩嫩 咪咪 xuebi7799520 枕枕 小婷 朱迪 荷序 熙熙 小雅 一霖 雅欣 穆穆 晓小 阿古娜扎 米咪 avril5200 苏欣欣 laopo_y 奶团 可可 苏沫 小电 小阿狸 萱萱酱 zyjzyjhh 碎碎 小冉 小可 唐若睫 娇娇 夏琳晚 小鱼儿SM 夏雪梨 夕颜 娆儿 小柒 敏敏 安然 yang66…
【1天内活跃妹子 377人】 小汐汐 张柏芝 司小礼 酱酱紫 梦瑶 萝婷宝 哆哆 小伊伊 红橙子 婷婷 艺涵 舒涵 汐汐 小妖精 小瑶瑶 沐沐 nannan520f lingling55001 吹箫箫 小鱼笑笑 幺妹 haodeba7 巧巧 宇儿 小S 舒瑶 前妻 小敏 秋雯雯 麦迪哪 悄悄 苏言 月亮 麦麦 瑶瑶 水姐 茸茸 晓奶兔 优乐美 怡宝 小美妞 秋葵 思妍 燕燕 小芭比 雅思雨 慕斯 萌萌 李思思 布丁 姗姗 彩红 香兔兔 暑假工 蛋蛋 雅琪 小困困 米露 可爱 xijaio2haodian 香佳佳 小灵 碧漾 sisi08080 名车 小晚晚 酸奶 bingbin…
📊 长沙总榜今日数据统计 📊 ✨ 今日新上榜:21 人 ❌ 今日下榜:28 人 🏆 当前总在榜:1115 人
【花名】:#兔兔 【位置】:#雨花区 【价格】: #600p #1200pp 【身材】:身高155,体重98 【年龄】:06 【电报】 : @pp456321
【花名】:#小芳 【位置】:#芙蓉区 【价格】:#500p #800pp 【身材】:162 【年龄】:25 【电报】 : @xiaojingcot
Showing the 12 most recent of 920 posts we hold for @fk0731. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
We recorded 6 posts on @fk0731 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“长沙总榜(每日更新)” (@fk0731), 85,488 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fk0731.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.