How Many Flat Earth Proofs? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TaDCqhkd2gY How many Flat Earth proofs can we come up with as a community? Get Connected with and Help Support Eric: Website: http://www.EricDubay.com Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/EricDubay Books: http://www.lulu.com/spotlight/ericdubay French: http://www.ericdubay.fr All My Other Links: https://linktr.ee/eric.dubay #flatearth #conspiracy #ericdubay

Channel
Eric Dubay's International Flat Earth Research Society
@flatearthericdubay
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
11,132subscribers
-229 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001266402580 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @flatearthericdubay |
| Created | 25 April 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 57 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/flatearthericdubay |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Nov 2026, 01:46 | 11,132 | -2 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 22:56 | 11,134 | -5 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 01:21 | 11,139 | -5 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 23:29 | 11,144 | -3 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 21:34 | 11,147 | -4 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 21:07 | 11,151 | +1 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 17:05 | 11,150 | -3 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 18:28 | 11,153 | -7 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 18:39 | 11,160 | -3 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 23:16 | 11,163 | -3 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 23:36 | 11,166 | +1 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 22:11 | 11,165 | -1 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 22:26 | 11,166 | +3 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 23:06 | 11,163 | -6 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 20:10 | 11,169 | -3 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 17:38 | 11,172 | -6 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 15:44 | 11,178 | -2 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 18:09 | 11,180 | -9 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 15:35 | 11,189 | -2 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 17:09 | 11,191 | first reading |
Engagement
22 posts held, back to 22 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 53 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 26.3%
- avg views ÷ 11,132 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,930
- 3 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 3
- of 22 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 22 (22 April 2026 – 2 November 2026) |
| Views total | 8,790 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Nov 2026, 20:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 18h 29m
- Average length
- 50m 25s
Measured directly from 22 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 3 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Mainstream Media Manipulation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sjlnU6BSICk How could such large scale conspiracies controlling the human race occur without the mainstream media ever noticing?... Get Connected with and Help Support Eric: Website: http://www.EricDubay.com Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/EricDubay Books: http://www.lulu.com/spotlight/ericdubay French: http://www.ericdubay.fr All My Other Links: https…
The Truth About UFOs and Aliens: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ko0QRAu2ZmA The truth about the UFO / Alien phenomenon is not what you've been taught to believe... Get Connected with and Help Support Eric: Website: http://www.EricDubay.com Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/EricDubay Books: http://www.lulu.com/spotlight/ericdubay French: http://www.ericdubay.fr All My Other Links: https://linktr.ee/eric.dubay #cons…
Big Brother Surveillance Society: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XNBsmUDQESI Today's society has slowly become something out of 1984 or Brave New World and most are too consumed by bread and circuses to notice... Get Connected with and Help Support Eric: Website: http://www.EricDubay.com Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/EricDubay Books: http://www.lulu.com/spotlight/ericdubay French: http://www.ericdubay.fr All …
Secret Freemasonic Hand-signs: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kQcAXp-dhI4 There are many secret sayings, handshakes, and gestures used by Masons both to recognize one another in public as well as to communicate specific information... Get Connected with and Help Support Eric: Website: http://www.EricDubay.com Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/EricDubay Books: http://www.lulu.com/spotlight/ericdubay French: http:/…
The Water Fluoridation Conspiracy: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dQY78wUfC4M Thanks to some poor science and an uneducated public, water supplies worldwide are being contaminated with a dangerous chemical under the guise of helping your teeth. Dr Robert Carton, a scientist who spent 20 years working for the US EPA said "Fluoridation is the greatest case of scientific fraud of this century, if not of all time.” …
Empty Your Mind, Be Formless, Shapeless, Like Water: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=43R0wW9P0F8 Discussing mixed martial arts, the origin of world languages, telepathy, Gnostic Christianity, the afterlife, semen retention, flat Earth and more with fellow martial artist and truth-seeker Muyeong Kim Get Connected with and Help Support Eric: Website: http://www.EricDubay.com Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/EricDubay…
Flat Earth Philosophy (Full Documentary): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OkdoSl95ABw Flat Earth Philosophy explores and exposes the gamut of pseudo-scientific sophistry and logical fallacies employed in defense of the modern heliocentric spinning globe-Earth model. Using philosophical frameworks such as the Zetetic Method, Occam's Razor, and Formal Logic, this documentary shows that the stationary geocentric flat E…
The Medical Mafia Scam: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YnnIdefIxjk There is an organized Masonic medical/insurance mafia scaring you into submission, dumbing you down, taking you for all your money, and killing you slowly... Get Connected with and Help Support Eric: Website: http://www.EricDubay.com Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/EricDubay Books: http://www.lulu.com/spotlight/ericdubay French: http://www.ericdub…
The Earth is Measured Flat: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XFSo-ytQkTw Discussing with Nathan Oakley his new book and the fact that all Earth measurements like angles, azimuth, altitude, distance, trajectory, triangulation, parallel, perpendicular, North, South, East, West, Up, Down and more all rely on a Cartesian co-ordinate system that requires a flat planar baseline Earth defined by mean sea-level. Nathan's B…
Gnostic Detectives in the Escape Realm: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=39PYXHBg5bo Discussing geo-engineering, chemtrails, HAARP, COVID, health, fasting, veganism vs. carnivore, ancient civilizations, soul-trap, flat Earth and more with conspiracy researcher / Pilates instructor Sarah Haskins... Get Connected with and Help Support Eric: Website: http://www.EricDubay.com Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/EricDubay B…
Is the Globe Scientific? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dK2Zoe0U3Ss Do you think the Earth being a globe is a settled scientific claim? The following video shows what it actually means for evidence to qualify as being scientific and examines whether the heliocentric globe Earth model fits the criteria. Please help share this presentation as an introduction to anyone you know who might be interested. Special thanks …
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @flatearthericdubay. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@Nasa_Hoax · 22,23827 postsThe Firmament Truth
@The_Firmament_Truth · 4851 postTyana Jasmyn
@tyanajasmynn · 11 postShideon & Gambo (Matt Gideon & Shambo)
@yodawan_backup · 3311 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@flatearth · 44,024
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 27 August 2026
@theflateartherr · 26,254
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 12 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Eric Dubay's International Flat Earth Research Society” (@flatearthericdubay), 11,132 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/flatearthericdubay.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.