Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Флэй

Channel

Флэй

@fleivoicer

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

180subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002083294907
TypeChannel
Username@fleivoicer
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/fleivoicer

Growth

180187183.57 August 2026 — 184 subscribers8 August 2026 — 184 subscribers16 August 2026 — 185 subscribers22 August 2026 — 187 subscribers28 August 2026 — 184 subscribers5 September 2026 — 183 subscribers14 September 2026 — 180 subscribers7 August 202614 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 38 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 179–188 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Sept 2026, 09:18180-3
5 Sept 2026, 22:41183-1
28 Aug 2026, 18:25184-3
22 Aug 2026, 15:45187+2
16 Aug 2026, 02:29185+1
8 Aug 2026, 12:30184no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:41184first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

125 reactions across 11 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53278743018214896613225.6%
2721.6%
custom 54539308746995429062620.8%
🔥1814.4%
😱97.20%
👌54.00%
custom 536633488355362894832.40%
custom 536160049815356448121.60%
❤‍🔥21.60%
😢10.8%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 125 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
18
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 11 we hold a reading for · 73%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @fleivoicer. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 11 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 19:17 UTC32 views16 reactions3 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Плоский покрас :) *Фон залила, чтоб с цветом было проще работать* #Арт

custom 532787430182148966194custom 54539308746995429063

6 Aug 2026, 18:44 UTC46 views14 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Порисульки от нефиг делать 🤔

custom 532787430182148966183custom 54539308746995429063

6 Aug 2026, 12:47 UTC47 views17 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Лайн :)

🔥8custom 545393087469954290642custom 53278743018214896612custom 53663348835536289481

6 Aug 2026, 11:18 UTC49 views12 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Еще скетчики :)

custom 53278743018214896617custom 53663348835536289482custom 545393087469954290621

4 Aug 2026, 11:36 UTC56 views14 reactions3 Starsread 8 August 2026

Posted without readable text

6custom 54539308746995429064❤‍🔥2custom 53278743018214896612

4 Aug 2026, 10:21 UTC56 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Как хорошо, что я душила этих придурков вопросами и в итоге забила, потому что ответы были уж слишком расплывчатыми)) Всегда лучше 1000000 раз все перепроверить. Если с вами правда связались по вопросу сотрудничества/рекламы и там все чисто-прозрачно — им бояться нечего, тем более обычных вопросов по типу «как и куда начисляется денежка?» (условно). Если вам говорят про сторонние приложения, !тем более! которых нет

😢1

4 Aug 2026, 09:46 UTC54 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Ребят, аккуратнее Даже мне какие-то додики писали

👌5

4 Aug 2026, 09:46 UTC48 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @artinside_tgPhoto

➡️Из предложки: Здравствуйте! Недавно столкнулась с новым, а может быть и не очень, видом скама: в телеграм-канал начинающему блогеру пишет человек и представляется сотрудником компании/агентства, пишет что-то вроде "Здравствуйте, нам очень понравился ваш контент, мы хотим сотрудничать с вами". Блогер на радостях отключает критическое мышление, он счастлив, что его заметили, и переходит в личные сообщения. После эт

😱4

4 Aug 2026, 08:42 UTC56 views10 reactions5 Starsread 8 August 2026

Posted without readable text

😱5custom 53616004981535644812custom 54539308746995429062custom 53278743018214896611

2 Aug 2026, 13:47 UTC79 views14 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Снова порисульки на руке :р

7custom 54539308746995429064custom 53278743018214896613

1 Aug 2026, 09:29 UTC79 views18 reactions3 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Вот вам глазик :> В ближайшее время будет не очень много постов, но постараюсь что-то да выкладывать

🔥104custom 54539308746995429064

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @fleivoicer. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Флэй” (@fleivoicer), 180 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fleivoicer.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.