Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for FliktoTheSheep

Channel

FliktoTheSheep

@fliktothelamb

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

54subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003111642406
TypeChannel
Username@fliktothelamb
CreatedBetween 1 September 2025 and 30 November 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/fliktothelamb

Growth

54565510 August 2026 — 54 subscribers11 August 2026 — 54 subscribers18 August 2026 — 55 subscribers25 August 2026 — 56 subscribers10 September 2026 — 54 subscribers10 August 202610 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 31 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 54–56 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Sept 2026, 14:3654-2
25 Aug 2026, 15:3456+1
18 Aug 2026, 20:4855+1
11 Aug 2026, 05:2254no change
10 Aug 2026, 10:3054first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 7 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

29 reactions across 8 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54696550334380298701655.2%
413.8%
custom 5231438426166805165310.3%
👍26.90%
🙏26.90%
custom 530560393431903785713.45%
💅13.45%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 29 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 09:56 UTC9 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @OnlySevenCharactersPhoto

алелуя психопаты

3

10 Aug 2026, 01:05 UTC29 viewsread 10 August 2026

вновь утраченное будет найдено или забыто?

8 Aug 2026, 18:52 UTC34 viewsread 10 August 2026

нужно создать свою игру мечты, но кроме деталей механики. у меня больше мыслей нет, а я уже сотню раз через такое проходила и понимаю что это смертельный проект

8 Aug 2026, 18:51 UTC34 viewsread 10 August 2026

проблема прям большая, потому что я хочу поиграть, но бля короче пиздец

8 Aug 2026, 18:51 UTC34 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

бля я хочу поиграть в такую игру, но понимаю что такой не существует и она состоит просто из того что мне нравится в других играх и чтоб поиграть в эту игру, мне нужно её создать

custom 53056039343190378571

8 Aug 2026, 14:34 UTC37 viewsread 10 August 2026

сегодню поудаляю весь щитпост не бойтесь

8 Aug 2026, 13:13 UTC38 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

геям скидка 50 процентов

1

8 Aug 2026, 10:05 UTC39 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

вот так вопрос на засыпку чисто из любопытства, а большая часть здесь сидящих щас летние каникулы?

custom 52314384261668051652

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @fliktothelamb. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“FliktoTheSheep” (@fliktothelamb), 54 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fliktothelamb.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.