разница между искусством и творчеством для самых маленьких или почему нытье художника без создания мощной формы это пошлая низкопробщина
✍406

Channel
@flomprime
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
12,166subscribers
+162 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002714749416 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @flomprime |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 28 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/flomprime |
Art & design — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 04:40 | 12,166 | +4 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 17:00 | 12,162 | +6 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 16:55 | 12,156 | -3 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 02:55 | 12,159 | +8 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 04:57 | 12,151 | +44 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 05:57 | 12,107 | +38 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 00:22 | 12,069 | +76 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 08:32 | 11,993 | +2 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 03:43 | 11,991 | +7 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 02:47 | 11,984 | -2 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 20:13 | 11,986 | +2 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 19:24 | 11,984 | -4 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 21:27 | 11,988 | -3 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 19:35 | 11,991 | -5 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 15:53 | 11,996 | +1 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 15:41 | 11,995 | +1 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 14:13 | 11,994 | -3 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 11:39 | 11,997 | +5 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 03:04 | 11,992 | +9 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 14:16 | 11,983 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 10 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 46 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
9,839 reactions across 17 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ✍ | 9,839 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9,839 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 10 June 2026 to 21 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
разница между искусством и творчеством для самых маленьких или почему нытье художника без создания мощной формы это пошлая низкопробщина
✍406
пора)
✍938
продолжая собирать заметки для книги, я неожиданно обнаружил, что несколько терминов, которыми я пытался описать разные формы влияния человека на других людей, очень хорошо сложились в систему вижу, что из получившихся противоположностей вырисовывается дико любопытный и необычный тест. не шаблонный мусор про «тип личности», а сложная динамическая структура на необычных развесовках и формулах пытающаяся определить: к…
✍714
вижу как много талантливых музыкантов напрягаются из-за своих «плохих» цифр 12 смартфонов/аккаунтов работает одна машина накрутки «нативных просмотров». а сколько накрутят 10 таких машин? 100? с прослушиваниями песен всё ещё проще: сотни смартфонов на аишной прошивке просто лежат и крутят ваши треки 24/7 по столько секунд, сколько надо для учета одного прослушивания мертвый интернет давно в этой суке идите путём …
✍730
альбом принца база. трек династия база. но артист июля крид
✍623
получаю подлинное экзистенциальное удовольствие от нового формата стримов фестов вся картинка кайфов вместе сошлась: - энергия от живой музыки - эмоции от общения с интересными творческими людьми - осознание нового культурного слоя - радость за наших людей которые через нас могут увидеть и обсудить выступления в восторге в общем, рефлексирую сегодня весь день)
✍472
вчера под клип тухолиса подставлял песню киркорова «бегущая по волнам» ни два вчерашних альбома, ни сам трек тухолиса, ни даже сегодняшняя вписка в майсом не смогли выбить из головы эту великую песню играет себе спокойно в голове неся с собой невероятный свет и блэсс был бы счастлив пожать за неё руку гениальному поэту и великому человеку илье рахмиэлевичу резнику
✍463
кто?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
✍347
Анна Каренина. Покровка.Театр побывал на закрытой премьере завораживающего зрелища первое театральное представление, где вместо аналоговых декораций использовано мультимедийное пространство: видео, свет, звук, проекционные технологии, генеративная графика и специальные визуальные эффекты до сих под впечатлением. потрясная игра актёров и костюмы, шикарный визуал и богатое прочтение драмы через призму шахматной парт…
✍313
первая победа на шахматном турнире)
✍1,120
впервые за 6 лет я поставил на своём аккаунте «оценки без рецензии» как вы знаете, моя оценка поставленная через специальную форму, которую вы привыкли видеть на стриме, выводится на сайте в отдельном поле (кругляшок залитый серым цветом). это накладывает определенные ограничения на мою свободу выставления оценки в критерии «Атмосфера / Вайб» хоть оценка в «Атмосфера / Вайб» является наиболее субъективным критерием…
✍449
чето поменялось после этого фильма, да
✍414
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @flomprime. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
кто?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 10 June 2026 to 21 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“флом” (@flomprime), 12,166 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/flomprime.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.