Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for МОТОПОМПА

Channel

МОТОПОМПА

@flugenhaime

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

978subscribers

+5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001877920656
TypeChannel
Username@flugenhaime
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/flugenhaime

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

973978975.56 August 2026 — 973 subscribers6 August 2026 — 973 subscribers15 August 2026 — 974 subscribers28 August 2026 — 976 subscribers6 September 2026 — 975 subscribers15 September 2026 — 978 subscribers6 August 202615 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 40 days, net +5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 972–979 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 01:00978+3
6 Sept 2026, 14:41975-1
28 Aug 2026, 23:54976+2
15 Aug 2026, 05:53974+1
6 Aug 2026, 13:34973no change
6 Aug 2026, 07:32973first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 23 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

232 reactions across 15 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁10846.6%
💯3715.9%
🔥3213.8%
208.62%
🤪146.03%
😭83.45%
👏41.72%
custom 544506564558875027331.29%
😘31.29%
💔20.862%
🫡10.431%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 232 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 13:32 UTC353 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Если бы я был плохим человеком, то попросил вас прифотошопить что нибудь деду и выложить в комментариях. Но я не такой. Я хороший 🥰

💯6

3 Aug 2026, 11:53 UTC386 views18 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Poll

Как решат проблему?

  1. Роспись в инструктаже48%
  2. Создать конспект по теме56%
  3. Провести селектор42%
  4. Сбор ЛС для проверки чемоданчика52%
  5. Выпустить новую медаль27%
  6. Фото отчет что все готовы48%

The shares total 273%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

😁11👏4🔥3

3 Aug 2026, 11:41 UTC337 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @toporlivePhoto

⚡️Россия может столкнуться с новыми видами чрезвычайных ситуаций из-за уязвимостей техносферы, — глава МЧС РФ Куренков. По его словам, главную долгосрочную угрозу представляют каскадные ЧС, которые могут развиваться по принципу «эффекта домино». Куренков отметил, что из-за тесной связи критически важных систем сбой на одном узле может быстро распространиться на другие отрасли и выйти за пределы одного ведомства или

1

1 Aug 2026, 12:13 UTC448 viewsread 6 August 2026

Чтобы доставлять гражданским радость а коллегам страдания 🙂

1 Aug 2026, 12:13 UTC388 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @ogneborets_spbPhoto

Боец, не забывай зачем ты в пожарной охране🫡

😭8💔2

1 Aug 2026, 08:05 UTC405 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @moscowmapPhoto

🤡 Международный День клоуна отмечается сегодня Поздравляем знакомых!

🤪14😘3

1 Aug 2026, 08:05 UTC459 views29 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Ребятки, которые не знают с какой стороны подойти к гидравлике но обязательно нажрутся 27 декабря - это про вас, дорогие мои.

💯21😁8

31 Jul 2026, 14:14 UTC460 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Когда нибудь, когда то не скоро, мы всем пожарным сообществом начнем выкладывать посты о помощи для всех коллег а не избранных. Но это будет совсем другая история.

10

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @flugenhaime. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

3 Aug 2026, 11:53 UTCAnonymous Poll181 voters

Как решат проблему?

  1. Роспись в инструктаже48%
  2. Создать конспект по теме56%
  3. Провести селектор42%
  4. Сбор ЛС для проверки чемоданчика52%
  5. Выпустить новую медаль27%
  6. Фото отчет что все готовы48%

The shares total 273%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 3 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“МОТОПОМПА” (@flugenhaime), 978 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/flugenhaime.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.