Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Fond_Victory

Channel

Fond_Victory

@fond_Victory

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

423subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001357496060
TypeChannel
Username@fond_Victory
DescriptionЗдесь всё с любовью ❤️
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 September 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/fond_Victory

Growth

4237 Aug 2026, 16:27 — 423 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 05:30 — 423 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 16:278 Aug 2026, 05:30
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 422–424 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 05:30423no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:27423first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 25 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
2,120
Videos
1,170
Links
15

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
30s
Average length
10s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

210 reactions across 7 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💔11052.4%
😢3918.6%
3717.6%
🙏178.10%
custom 521569400377260273141.90%
custom 535274095557948995020.952%
😱10.476%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 210 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 19:03 UTC96 views35 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Как же иногда хочется вернуться в прошлое… 💔 Я какой-то новый этап в своей жизни прохожу. Для кого-то из людей является страшным и некомфортным одна только мысль завести у себя дома малюсенького котика. А я вот на пороге чего-то еще более страшного сейчас пребываю. Это когда абсолютно не боязно, если у тебя во вполне себе нормальной жизни даже 15-25… собак будут проживать и 10-20… котиков…. Самое страшное, если они

💔30🙏4custom 53527409555794899501

4 Aug 2026, 19:03 UTC95 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

18💔2custom 52156940037726027312

4 Aug 2026, 19:03 UTC90 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

19custom 52156940037726027312custom 53527409555794899501

26 Jul 2026, 19:55 UTC212 views55 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Бореньки не стало два часа назад. Я тянула до вечера, не поднималась рука попросить об эвтаназии, не позволяли нервы… и вот это свойственное людям извечное чувство надежды… это чувство в тебе настолько глубоко сидит каждый раз… Он ушел до начала агонии, успели до ее начала, но ушел в угнетенном состоянии, в котором уже третьи сутки пребывал… Без всяких шуток - вот, я видео во вторник публиковала - Боря с уже готовыми

💔44😢10😱1

26 Jul 2026, 12:48 UTC168 views29 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Я боюсь, что это последнее видео с Борей. Нет положительной динамики. Лейкоциты 0,3. Я не могу объясняться сейчас длинными текстами, пожалуйста, поймите насколько это всё сложно 😭 Я объясняюсь с врачами, я беру сторонние консультации, я анализирую 24/7 все происходящее в надежде Бореньку спасти 😭 Но если надежды нет, то мучать я никого не стану. Я не стану залечивать, измываться, смотреть на агонии…. Я взяла сейчас р

😢17💔6🙏6

25 Jul 2026, 21:15 UTC140 views24 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Это Боря сегодня. Я весь день разрываю свою душу на мизерные кусочки в переживаниях за любимого котика 💔 За минувшие сутки мы смогли собрать ему помощь на один единственный день в вет клинике… Завтра последний день оплачивать корма собакам в Каширу. Сижу, размышляю, что в этой жизни я делаю не так…

😢12🙏7💔5

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @fond_Victory. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Angeltails🤍
@angel_tails · 29,450
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 15 September 2026
Nadinkalife
@nadinkalife · 32,438
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 4 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Fond_Victory” (@fond_Victory), 423 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fond_Victory.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.