Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𔓕 fònllu

Channel

𔓕 fònllu

@fonluc_c

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

145subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002255780133
TypeChannel
Username@fonluc_c
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/fonluc_c

Growth

1451471466 August 2026 — 146 subscribers8 August 2026 — 146 subscribers14 August 2026 — 147 subscribers4 September 2026 — 145 subscribers6 August 20264 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 29 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 145–147 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Sept 2026, 16:59145-2
14 Aug 2026, 18:46147+1
8 Aug 2026, 20:47146no change
6 Aug 2026, 19:51146first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 15 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

377 reactions across 16 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
12633.4%
custom 5422553742010503019277.16%
custom 5264862608988582064256.63%
🎉246.37%
custom 5429547383287470532236.10%
❤‍🔥236.10%
🍓205.31%
custom 5226458067989711457184.77%
custom 5384495727562989608184.77%
🕊184.77%
🐳174.51%
custom 5458889590536426106143.71%
102.65%
👾102.65%
custom 524676595326545521420.531%
custom 537994753329019410410.265%
👍10.265%

Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 377 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 16 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
7
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @fonluc_c. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 21:08 UTC44 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026

ну скоро да будут арты… скоро…

123🕊2❤‍🔥1

2 Aug 2026, 11:04 UTC118 views40 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

довели держите

14🍓6👾5custom 54225537420105030194custom 526486260898858206432🕊2custom 52264580679897114572

2 Aug 2026, 10:09 UTC110 views24 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

ничего не могу нарисовать пока что, поэтому смотрите на красивейшие фотки

🍓9custom 5422553742010503019653👾1

29 Jul 2026, 08:28 UTC163 views26 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

шпашебо за такого красивого феола от рекуши 🥹 чудесный реквестик от любимки

🐳107custom 54295473832874705324custom 52648626089885820642❤‍🔥1🎉1custom 54225537420105030191

28 Jul 2026, 11:33 UTC148 views29 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

спойлер на палитру, в ближайшие время не ждите диджа

12🐳4👾4🍓2custom 52648626089885820642custom 53844957275629896082❤‍🔥1👍1

27 Jul 2026, 22:22 UTC139 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

с днем рождения рекушу! 🫶

2❤‍🔥2🕊2🍓1🎉1🐳1custom 54225537420105030191

27 Jul 2026, 17:24 UTC138 views29 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

спойлер не скоро оооййй как не скоро

custom 542954738328747053286custom 54225537420105030194custom 52648626089885820643custom 52264580679897114572custom 53844957275629896082custom 54588895905364261062🍓1

25 Jul 2026, 22:06 UTC144 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

спасибо за звездочки лапули!

5

24 Jul 2026, 20:09 UTC228 views32 reactions7 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

пока ток традиш хочется, в дидже пока совсем нет желания че то делать хотите в хорошем качестве какую-нибудь старую картинку с канала? со скетчбука, скиньте пж какую хотите

13custom 54225537420105030196custom 52648626089885820645custom 52467659532654552142custom 54295473832874705322❤‍🔥1🕊1custom 52264580679897114571

22 Jul 2026, 20:51 UTC194 views30 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

некий коллаб с рекушей)) это кстати та же моль, что и на посте сверху

10🎉6custom 52648626089885820646🕊3custom 53844957275629896082custom 54295473832874705322custom 52264580679897114571

22 Jul 2026, 18:54 UTC207 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

я думаю думаю думаю и еще раз думаю что рисовать, полноценка с девушкой будет но не скоро потому что я ДУМАЮ так шо пока шо моль пьяная

12🎉6🕊5custom 52264580679897114571custom 53799475332901941041

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @fonluc_c. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

21 Jul 2026, 14:56 UTCFinal Results14 voters

в этот раз без гуро, но выбирайте

  1. пацанчик50%
  2. девушка79%

The shares total 129%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𔓕 fònllu” (@fonluc_c), 145 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fonluc_c.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.