Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ЗвероПятница🐶🐱🐰🦊🐭🥹

Channel

ЗвероПятница🐶🐱🐰🦊🐭🥹

@fontankazveri

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

9,205subscribers

+119 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002250198109
TypeChannel
Username@fontankazveri
DescriptionКанал о животных, проект @fontankaspb По рекламе пишите @Feedbackfontanka — с пометкой «для ЗвероПятницы»
CreatedBetween 1 August 2024 and 31 January 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 November 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/fontankazveri

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 73% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

9,0369,2199,127.56 August 2026 — 9,086 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,077 subscribers9 August 2026 — 9,070 subscribers12 August 2026 — 9,059 subscribers16 August 2026 — 9,046 subscribers22 August 2026 — 9,052 subscribers25 August 2026 — 9,046 subscribers28 August 2026 — 9,039 subscribers1 September 2026 — 9,036 subscribers4 September 2026 — 9,048 subscribers9 September 2026 — 9,072 subscribers13 September 2026 — 9,085 subscribers17 September 2026 — 9,087 subscribers26 September 2026 — 9,129 subscribers4 October 2026 — 9,159 subscribers11 October 2026 — 9,170 subscribers15 October 2026 — 9,173 subscribers18 October 2026 — 9,178 subscribers21 October 2026 — 9,193 subscribers24 October 2026 — 9,205 subscribers26 October 2026 — 9,219 subscribers29 October 2026 — 9,212 subscribers2 November 2026 — 9,215 subscribers4 November 2026 — 9,205 subscribers9,2056 August 20264 November 2026
24 measurements spanning 91 days, net +119. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,009–9,246 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Nov 2026, 18:159,205-10
2 Nov 2026, 00:469,215+3
29 Oct 2026, 20:489,212-7
26 Oct 2026, 21:259,219+14
24 Oct 2026, 05:219,205+12
21 Oct 2026, 08:099,193+15
18 Oct 2026, 06:199,178+5
15 Oct 2026, 01:009,173+3
11 Oct 2026, 21:589,170+11
4 Oct 2026, 23:409,159+30
26 Sept 2026, 06:379,129+42
17 Sept 2026, 12:579,087+2
13 Sept 2026, 07:169,085+13
9 Sept 2026, 19:009,072+24
4 Sept 2026, 17:209,048+12
1 Sept 2026, 04:389,036-3
28 Aug 2026, 18:339,039-7
25 Aug 2026, 17:029,046-6
22 Aug 2026, 23:149,052+6
16 Aug 2026, 14:559,046first reading

Engagement

256 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 41 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
42.8%
avg views ÷ 9,205 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,940
50 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.82%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
50
of 256 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held256 (4 August 2026 – 7 November 2026)
Views total197,183
Reactions total3,592
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Nov 2026, 23:11 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈3,650
Videos
≈4,640
Links
≈5,570

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1h 05m
Average length
22s

Measured directly from 176 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

16,421 reactions across 238 posts, in 39 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤8,11149.4%
😁2,86517.4%
🥰1,66510.1%
👍1,3348.12%
🤣6764.12%
🔥5413.29%
❤‍🔥2571.57%
😍1841.12%
😱1360.828%
😢1250.761%
💯830.505%
🙏540.329%
😨490.298%
😘440.268%
👀420.256%
👏400.244%
🎉260.158%
🤔250.152%
🤩250.152%
🤡220.134%
19 further kinds1170.713%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 256 of the 256 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17,721 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 256 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 256 we hold a reading for · 0.8%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @fontankazveri. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 256 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 7 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 50 posts held from the last 30 days (2.00%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

7 Nov 2026, 19:22 UTC363 views45 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Video

Большие лапы охраняют маленький сон. #доброй_ночи_пост ЗвероПятница — проект «Фонтанки» о животных

❤30🥰10❤‍🔥3👍2

7 Nov 2026, 17:20 UTC563 views53 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Большой брат следит за тобой (из-за занавески) 😾 ЗвероПятница — проект «Фонтанки» о животных

❤42😁8👍2🔥1

7 Nov 2026, 15:18 UTC661 views73 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Video

Бой века! В красном углу ринга — триста граммов ярости. В синем — столько же, но ещё злее. ЗвероПятница — проект «Фонтанки» о животных

❤43🥰21😁8👍1

7 Nov 2026, 13:06 UTC643 views40 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

На «Землю леопарда» спустился инопланетянин! По крайней мере, именно так выглядит этот необычный гость с загадочными отростками на голове. Но никакой летающей тарелки поблизости нет: перед нами пятнистый олень. А то, что напоминает инопланетные антенны, на самом деле растущие рога. Вот такие внеземные технологии. 📷 Земля леопарда ЗвероПятница — проект «Фонтанки» о животных

❤30👍7😁2🙏1

7 Nov 2026, 11:14 UTC705 views84 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Video

#Состояние: принять форму круга и дать свободу лапкам ЗвероПятница — проект «Фонтанки» о животных

❤46🥰24🤣9❤‍🔥2👍2😁1

7 Nov 2026, 09:12 UTC≈29,600 views58 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Двух необычных уток заметили на озере у проспекта Луначарского. Оказалось, обе птицы по-своему интересны! Первая, с белой щечкой, — синьга. Как рассказал биолог Павел Глазков, для Петербурга это редкая гостья. Вероятно, молодая утка отстала от стаи во время перелета и решила немного отдохнуть и подкрепиться перед дальней дорогой. А вот вторая птица — гибрид кряквы с другим видом уток. Определить второго родителя по…

❤41👍8😍4😁2💯1🕊1🙏1

7 Nov 2026, 07:10 UTC730 views46 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Video

Завтрак, конечно, дело важное. Но в субботу можно сначала хорошенько выспаться, потом еще немного поспать, а уже после подумать о еде. Доброе утро! Пусть сегодня никуда не придется спешить 📷 Московский зоопарк ЗвероПятница — проект «Фонтанки» о животных

❤38😁5😍2👍1

6 Nov 2026, 19:22 UTC810 views63 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Video

Вот они, наши любимые пушистые и хвостатые. Знакомимся слева направо и сверху вниз. Устраивайтесь поудобнее и любуйтесь пятничной порцией ЗвероСторис. #доброй_ночи_пост ЗвероПятница — проект «Фонтанки» о животных

❤52🥰5❤‍🔥4👍2

6 Nov 2026, 17:42 UTC836 views55 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Video

В вольере лемуров в Калиниградском зоопарке появился новый жилец. Круглый, оранжевый и подозрительно молчаливый... На самом деле тыква здесь не просто для красоты. Даже если животные не станут её пробовать, знакомство с необычным предметом пойдёт им на пользу. Новые запахи и впечатления пробуждают любопытство и помогают разнообразить привычные будни. Ну а если тыква так и останется нетронутой, будет хотя бы украшат…

🥰26👍18❤10😍1

6 Nov 2026, 16:19 UTC857 views93 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Video

Молодой специалист проходит стажировку в клининговой компании и уже освоил служебный транспорт. Теперь внимательно следит за качеством уборки, не отрываясь от поездки. 😼️️️️️️ ЗвероПятница — проект «Фонтанки» о животных

🤣49🥰24❤13👍3🔥2😁2

6 Nov 2026, 14:37 UTC853 views63 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Лиса устроила прогулку среди уток в Нижне-Свирском заповеднике 🦊🦊 Рыжая хищница спокойно разгуливала по берегу, где отдыхали многочисленные утки. Птицы даже не попытались улететь и продолжили заниматься своими делами. Хотя утки вполне могли бы стать добычей лисы, в этот раз охота в её планы явно не входила. 📷 Нижне-Свирский государственный заповедник ЗвероПятница — проект «Фонтанки» о животных

❤42🥰15🙏5👍1

6 Nov 2026, 13:06 UTC868 views72 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Video

А вы к кому? Вы по записи? А бахилы где?😏 📷 Дневник зоокипера ЗвероПятница — проект «Фонтанки» о животных

❤46😢14😁7❤‍🔥3👍1🙏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 256 posts we hold for @fontankazveri. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ЗвероПятница🐶🐱🐰🦊🐭🥹” (@fontankazveri), 9,205 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fontankazveri.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.