Channel
@footballforpost
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
3subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001191754108 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @footballforpost |
| Description | Футбольный Форпост (FF) - самый честный канал о российском футболе. Авторское мнение, главные новости и слухи, все все про наш футбол вы найдете на ФФ. |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/footballforpost |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 12:02 | 3 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:06 | 3 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 11 August 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 August 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
22 reactions across 12 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 16 | 72.7% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 22.7% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 4.55% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 22 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 11 August 2023 to 29 August 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Факел 0:0 Краснодар Удивительный результат, но ему есть объяснение. Поехали. Все в порядке. Как и ожидалось, Краснодар играл первым номером, доминировал, и атаковал. Владение мячом у быков 66,5%, 15 ударов по воротам. Просто уничтожили Факел. Но есть нюанс. По ударам в створ, счет 4:1. В пользу Факела. У Краснодара 8 ударов мимо, 6 заблокированных ударов, и 2 попадания в каркас. Можно говорить, что это невезение, н…
👏1
Оренбург 1:1 ЦСКА Интересный матч, есть что отметить. Первое - преобразившийся Оренбург. Интересный футбол в дебютном матче Деограсии, так ещё и против ЦСКА. Смело и качественно. Должен был забирать победу Оренбург. Но здесь открывается второе. Второе - вратари. Не знаю как по мне, но ни Сысуев, ни Кеняйкин, ни даже Ходанович (пока) не уровень Оренбурга. Не уровень РПЛ даже наверное. Вопросов нет, они иногда выдаю…
👏2
Очень интересно бывает поизучать статистику xG. Например, Оренбург должен был побеждать ЦСКА, Краснодар заслужил победу с Факелом, а Рубин с Динамо. Спартак же должен был проиграть Ахмату.
👍2
Свежий разбор xG от наших друзей из VSporte x Яндекс Плюс 📊 В 6-м туре #МирРПЛ: 🔹 У половины команд xG был ниже единицы 🔹 В топе – «Зенит», «Ахмат», «Оренбург» и «Пари НН» 🔹 У «Динамо» и «Крыльев Советов» xG был ниже единицы, но оба клуба забили по два гола
👍1
Факел 2:0 Пари НН Неплохая игра в исполнении воронежцев. Удивительно, но подопечные Евсеева довольно долго владели мячом, аж 60% времени. Пари НН же ожидаемо играл вторым номером. Но несмотря на это, статистика ударов абсолютно равна (13-13). А вот по ударам в створ, у Факела пятикратное преимущество - 5:1. Символично, что единственный удар в створ у Пари НН нанес Эдгар Севикян, который, как по мне, становится этаки…
👍2
Краснодар 1:1 Локомотив В этом матче, Локо, объективно опять отскочил. Всю игру Краснодар выглядел лучше и интереснее. 16-11 по ударам (5-3 в створ правда всего), 60%-40% по владению мячом, и 7-4 по выигранным верховым дуэлям. Локо лучше был лишь в удачном дриблинге (4-5), и в отборах мяча. Аж 24 раза, железнодорожники отнимали мяч у соперника, те же 24 раза выносили мяч, и 9 раз совершали перехваты. В общем, оборон…
👍2
Я вернулся, господа, надеюсь, вы готовы читать мой канал дальше! И начнём мы с обзоров матчей прошедшего тура, как обычно: Рубин 2:1 Крылья Советов Ну, результат удивил, как и игра. Не ожидал, что Рубин перебьёт Крылья по ударам, а они это сделали (9-7). Вообще, казанцы в этом матче показали классную оборонительную игру и вертикальную игру в атаке, а Крылья, владея мячом, особо много не смогли создать. Так что по и…
👍2
Уважаемые подписчики! Добрый день! Как вам тур? Знаю, что ещё не все, но в целом. Хотел вас предупредить, что к сожалению буду отсутствовать до конца недели по семейным обстоятельствам. Как только вернусь, выложу обзоры всех матчей, итоги премий тура, новые опросы, и все то, что должен ещё выложить. Не скучайте😥
👍3
Матч тура
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Физрук тура
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Тренер тура
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Худшая команда тура
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @footballforpost. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 6 most recent of 7 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Матч тура
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Физрук тура
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Тренер тура
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Худшая команда тура
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Лучшая команда тура
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Худший игрок тура
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 11 August 2023 to 29 August 2023. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“FOOтбольный FOOрпост” (@footballforpost), 3 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/footballforpost.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.