Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for π‘°π’”π’π’‚π’Žπ’Šπ’„ 𝑾𝒂𝒍𝒍𝒑𝒂𝒑𝒆𝒓 & π‘·π’“π’π’‡π’Šπ’π’†π’” HDβ„’

Channel

π‘°π’”π’π’‚π’Žπ’Šπ’„ 𝑾𝒂𝒍𝒍𝒑𝒂𝒑𝒆𝒓 & π‘·π’“π’π’‡π’Šπ’π’†π’” HDβ„’

@for_islamicPp

On this record: Topic Β· Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Telegram's recommendations Β· Cite this entry

16,573subscribers

-264 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001406162291
TypeChannel
Username@for_islamicPp
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 November 2021 β€” estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/for_islamicPp

Topic

Religion β€” a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β€” it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

16,57316,83716,7057 August 2026 β€” 16,837 subscribers7 August 2026 β€” 16,837 subscribers7 August 2026 β€” 16,836 subscribers8 August 2026 β€” 16,823 subscribers9 August 2026 β€” 16,824 subscribers10 August 2026 β€” 16,812 subscribers11 August 2026 β€” 16,811 subscribers12 August 2026 β€” 16,809 subscribers13 August 2026 β€” 16,802 subscribers14 August 2026 β€” 16,791 subscribers16 August 2026 β€” 16,784 subscribers17 August 2026 β€” 16,774 subscribers18 August 2026 β€” 16,762 subscribers19 August 2026 β€” 16,754 subscribers20 August 2026 β€” 16,746 subscribers21 August 2026 β€” 16,740 subscribers23 August 2026 β€” 16,737 subscribers24 August 2026 β€” 16,721 subscribers25 August 2026 β€” 16,705 subscribers26 August 2026 β€” 16,689 subscribers27 August 2026 β€” 16,688 subscribers28 August 2026 β€” 16,710 subscribers29 August 2026 β€” 16,752 subscribers30 August 2026 β€” 16,742 subscribers31 August 2026 β€” 16,727 subscribers1 September 2026 β€” 16,730 subscribers2 September 2026 β€” 16,702 subscribers4 September 2026 β€” 16,714 subscribers6 September 2026 β€” 16,683 subscribers9 September 2026 β€” 16,659 subscribers12 September 2026 β€” 16,647 subscribers13 September 2026 β€” 16,646 subscribers15 September 2026 β€” 16,627 subscribers17 September 2026 β€” 16,573 subscribers7 August 202617 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 41 days, net -264. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,533–16,877 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β€” every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 13:4016,573-54
15 Sept 2026, 11:1716,627-19
13 Sept 2026, 18:1416,646-1
12 Sept 2026, 00:5716,647-12
9 Sept 2026, 16:4016,659-24
6 Sept 2026, 11:4016,683-31
4 Sept 2026, 05:2016,714+12
2 Sept 2026, 21:3816,702-28
1 Sept 2026, 19:2316,730+3
31 Aug 2026, 21:5616,727-15
30 Aug 2026, 22:3716,742-10
29 Aug 2026, 19:0716,752+42
28 Aug 2026, 21:2816,710+22
27 Aug 2026, 19:1616,688-1
26 Aug 2026, 21:5616,689-16
25 Aug 2026, 22:4516,705-16
24 Aug 2026, 21:4616,721-16
23 Aug 2026, 10:0716,737-3
21 Aug 2026, 22:3916,740-6
20 Aug 2026, 17:1216,746first reading

Engagement

25 posts held, back to 13 July 2026 β€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR Β· 30 days
14.6%
avg views Γ· 16,573 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,410
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.48%
reactions Γ· views Β· ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 25 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· views β€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held25 (13 July 2026 – 1 September 2026)
Views total9,650
Reactions total143
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface β€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 09:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than β€œcorrecting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β€” 8.12K, 3.7M β€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

995 reactions across 25 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 77.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❀77077.4%
πŸ‘777.74%
πŸ₯°696.93%
πŸ’―414.12%
πŸ’”242.41%
😒60.603%
πŸ†’40.402%
πŸ‘Œ40.402%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β€” πŸ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β€” 4.34K, 1.2M β€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post β€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β€” those same posts carry 995 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by β€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Sept 2026, 03:15 UTCβ‰ˆ1,240 views23 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

πŸ«† @for_islamicPp πŸ«† @for_islamicPp

❀23

Signed β€ΝŸΝžπ—”β’·π——π—¨

31 Aug 2026, 18:40 UTCβ‰ˆ1,460 views38 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

πŸ«† @for_islamicPp πŸ«† @for_islamicPp

πŸ₯°20πŸ‘9❀5πŸ‘Œ4

Signed NEBIL

31 Aug 2026, 04:38 UTCβ‰ˆ1,760 views34 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

@for_islamicPpπŸ’ 

❀33πŸ’―1

Signed β€ΝŸΝžπ—”β’·π——π—¨

21 Aug 2026, 06:09 UTCβ‰ˆ5,190 views48 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

@for_islamicPpπŸ’ 

❀43πŸ₯°5

Signed β€ΝŸΝžπ—”β’·π——π—¨

16 Aug 2026, 18:17 UTCβ‰ˆ6,600 views47 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

@for_islamicPpπŸ’ 

❀36πŸ₯°7πŸ‘4

Signed Sebehadin

6 Aug 2026, 19:21 UTCβ‰ˆ8,560 views56 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

πŸ«† @for_islamicPp πŸ«† @for_islamicPp

❀30πŸ’”21πŸ‘3😒2

Signed NEBIL

6 Aug 2026, 03:10 UTCβ‰ˆ7,650 views52 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🫱 @for_islamicPp 🫱 @for_islamicPp

❀47πŸ₯°4😒1

Signed β€ΝŸΝžπ—”β’·π——π—¨

5 Aug 2026, 03:08 UTCβ‰ˆ6,960 views50 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🫱 @for_islamicPp 🫱 @for_islamicPp

❀38πŸ₯°9πŸ’”3

Signed β€ΝŸΝžπ—”β’·π——π—¨

31 Jul 2026, 03:03 UTCβ‰ˆ7,910 views71 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🫱 @for_islamicPp 🫱 @for_islamicPp

❀62πŸ‘6πŸ₯°3

Signed β€ΝŸΝžπ—”β’·π——π—¨

29 Jul 2026, 03:10 UTCβ‰ˆ7,100 views47 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🫱 @for_islamicPp 🫱 @for_islamicPp

πŸ‘26❀15πŸ’―3😒3

Signed β€ΝŸΝžπ—”β’·π——π—¨

28 Jul 2026, 03:59 UTCβ‰ˆ6,220 views50 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🫱 @for_islamicPp 🫱 @for_islamicPp

❀37πŸ’―13

Signed β€ΝŸΝžπ—”β’·π——π—¨

26 Jul 2026, 03:00 UTCβ‰ˆ7,330 views42 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🫱 @for_islamicPp 🫱 @for_islamicPp

❀42

Signed β€ΝŸΝžπ—”β’·π——π—¨

Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @for_islamicPp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel β€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β€” the β€œNamed by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly β€” each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

α‹«αˆ²αŠ• αŠ‘αˆ©οΈοΈ YASIN NURU
@yasin_nuru Β· 42,404
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 70 here β€” alongside 69 others β€” read 29 August 2026
α‹¨αŠα‰’α‹«α‰΅ αˆ˜αŠ•αŒˆα‹΅ | Ψ·Ψ±ΩŠΩ‚ Ψ§Ω„Ψ£Ω†Ψ¨ΩŠΨ§Ψ‘
@path_of_the_prophets Β· 27,553
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 69 here β€” alongside 68 others β€” read 10 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one β€” see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œπ‘°π’”π’π’‚π’Žπ’Šπ’„ 𝑾𝒂𝒍𝒍𝒑𝒂𝒑𝒆𝒓 & π‘·π’“π’π’‡π’Šπ’π’†π’” HDℒ” (@for_islamicPp), 16,573 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/for_islamicPp.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.