Channel
@forenmarvdc
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
339subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 5 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001751378457 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @forenmarvdc |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 5 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/forenmarvdc |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Sept 2026, 18:55 | 339 | -2 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 17:23 | 341 | no change |
| 5 Sept 2026, 16:47 | 341 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (26 July 2026 – 22 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,750 |
| Reactions total | 39 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Sept 2026, 17:23 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
40 reactions across 7 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤🔥 | 15 | 37.5% | |
| 🔥 | 13 | 32.5% | |
| 💘 | 8 | 20.0% | |
| 🙈 | 3 | 7.50% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 2.50% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 40 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 22 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Премьера «Нового дня» уже отгремела в кинотеатрах РФ, теперь давайте обсуждать, как вам фильм? ❤🔥 – АХУЙ 💘 – попал прямо в сердечко, 10/10 🤔 – середнячок 💔 – я разочарован(а), худший фильм о паучке 🙈 – ещё не смотрел(а) В комментариях обсуждаем со спойлерами!
❤🔥15💘8🙈3
Давайте разберем еще один вариант: Виктор будет считать, что его жизнь "украли". Не физически, а как возможность. Он должен был вырасти с матерью, должен был быть признанным, а вместо этого — война, изгнание, клеймо злодея, хотя он просто хотел порядка. Для примера возьмем отдельно Стива, ведь он, как мне кажется, самый яркий пример в данном случае. Стив смог вернуться в прошлое и забрать свою украденную жизнь обратн…
«Мстители: Судный День» – фильм не о Мстителях? Доктор Дум не злодей? Если Marvel хотят сделать финал саги "мультивселенной" великим, а не просто «ещё одним кроссовером», они обязаны дать Думу глубокий психологический бэкграунд. Давайте разберемся на чем будет основана его мотивация против Мстителей: Дум – не типичный злодей жаждущий власти, он жаждет контроля! Его детство в Латверии было адом: смерть родителей, в…
Видели уже слитые фото со съемок «Судного Дня»? Тут Тобик в костюме для захвата движений, неужели новый костюм подгонят старичку?? Жаль ток что он будет на графике *Фото сделано при помощи нейросети, Дисней не бань*
Постер в придачу
🔥2
Первый трейлер сериала «Квест Вижна»! Премьера – 14 октября этого года.
🔥3
Новый трейлер «Мстителей: Судный День»!
🔥2
ОФИЦИАЛЬНЫЙ КАСТ НОВЫХ «ЛЮДЕЙ-ИКС»: ~ Сэди Синк - Джин Грей ~ Кристофер Эббот - Профессор Икс ~ Кит Коннор - Циклоп ~ Самара Уивинг - Эмма Фрост ~ Инде Наваррети - Роуг ~ Майя Бойд - Шторм ~ Адам Драйвер - Мистер Синистер Премьера фильма состоится 5 мая 2028 года!
🔥3
Новый постер «Мстителей: Судный День»!
🔥3
Чет суета какая-то на стриме
Латверийские ведьмы – свита Дума в «Секретных воинах»! Доктору думу в фильме будут нужны не просто солдаты, а адепты, которые поддерживают его культ и власть на метафизическом уровне. В комиксах эту роль отчасти исполняли варианты Тора (Корпус Торов), но в киновселенной логичнее вписать уже знакомую магическую систему — латверийских ведьм. Они идеальные служительницы нового мирового порядка Дума. Они не просто прид…
🤩1
Кто потенциально может составить конкуренцию Думу в «Судном Дне»? Самое очевидное – Стив Роджерс. Дум лично ненавидит Стива за то, что тот сломал мультверс в «Финале». Думаю в фильме у них будет личный конфликт и Кэп может стать именно тем козырем, который может отвлечь Дума в решающий момент. Рид Ричардс: в комиксах они заклятые враги и именно Мистер Фантастик являлся икс-фактором в Секретных Войнах. Рид превосход…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @forenmarvdc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Foren Marvel/DC | Мстители: Судный день” (@forenmarvdc), 339 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/forenmarvdc.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.