Photo, posted without a caption
β€1π₯1

Channel
@forexiacrypto
On this record: Topic Β· Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry
2,198subscribers
-96 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 1,000β3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002077415641 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @forexiacrypto |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/forexiacrypto |
Crypto & trading β a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelβs own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a modelβs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 01:01 | 2,198 | -10 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 02:59 | 2,208 | -10 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 22:35 | 2,218 | -24 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 05:58 | 2,242 | -7 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 02:35 | 2,249 | -7 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 17:27 | 2,256 | -3 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 22:28 | 2,259 | -8 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 01:07 | 2,267 | -5 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 21:43 | 2,272 | -5 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 16:38 | 2,277 | -9 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 00:41 | 2,286 | -6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:18 | 2,292 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:03 | 2,294 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:11 | 2,294 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 23 June 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
52 reactions across 12 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| β€ | 19 | 36.5% | |
| π₯ | 16 | 30.8% | |
| π₯° | 4 | 7.69% | |
| π | 3 | 5.77% | |
| πΎ | 2 | 3.85% | |
| π | 2 | 3.85% | |
| π± | 2 | 3.85% | |
| π€© | 2 | 3.85% | |
| π | 1 | 1.92% | |
| π€― | 1 | 1.92% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 52 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Photo, posted without a caption
β€1π₯1
Photo, posted without a caption
β€1π₯1
https://decentralprop.com/docs/protocol-overview
So for those that have not understood yet fully: DecentralProp.com - Is the autonomous engine, the on-chain tokenized prop firm factory. A protocol where anyone can launch their own branded autonomous prop firm. https://trade.dprop.fun/firm/trustless - Is simply an autonomous prop firm that was deployed using the DecentralProp infrastructure. This was the first firm deployed to the protocol, and is branded as βTruβ¦
π₯2β€1
Photo, posted without a caption
β€1π1π₯1π€©1
Let's talk about the actual disease at the center of the prop firm industry, because most people trading these challenges have no idea it's even there. Here's the business model, structurally, not calling out any specific company. You pay a fee to enter an evaluation. The overwhelming majority of people who pay that fee never pass it, that's just the reality of pass rates across this industry. Which means the bulk oβ¦
β€5πΎ2π₯°2π±1
π Forexia GEMS π - Crypto Calls pinned Β«What's good Forexia Family. Some of you already know I've been heads-down on something for over a year now, targeting a Solana launch next month. If you were here for Altoid or Swarms and watched us print thousands of Xs, you know exactly what this groupβ¦Β»
What's good Forexia Family. Some of you already know I've been heads-down on something for over a year now, targeting a Solana launch next month. If you were here for Altoid or Swarms and watched us print thousands of Xs, you know exactly what this group can do. This time is bigger. This isn't a meme, and it's not hype that's gone in a week. It's built on an industry that already moves billions outside of crypto: pβ¦
β€2π1π₯1
Real talk, let me break down exactly why this is different from anything you've seen before. Prop trading is already a massive industry. FTMO, E8, Apex, funded trading as a whole moves billions of dollars a year and has been a real, working business model for over a decade, completely outside of crypto. That part isn't speculation. Here's the problem with every single firm in that industry: they're centralized. Youβ¦
π₯4β€1π€―1π±1
Every firm on the protocol also carries a public trust score, visible before you ever deposit a dollar. A firm can't quietly build a bad reputation. It's sitting on the storefront for everyone to see. This is what actually threatens the existing industry. Not a nicer UI, not lower fees. The whole prop firm business model depends on traders trusting a company that has every incentive to make it hard to get paid. Takeβ¦
β€1π1π₯1π₯°1
Let's get into the tokens, because this is the part most people are sleeping on. Every firm deployed on DecentralProp gets its own token with its own ticker, and it launches exactly like you're used to: a bonding curve, same mechanics as pump.fun. The curve is public and tradeable from the second the firm deploys, no presale, no insider round. The only supply held back is 20% locked straight into the firm's own treaβ¦
β€3π1π€©1π₯°1
MASSIVE move on $JOBY for everyone still in we hit over 500% gains so far..
β€2π₯2π2
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @forexiacrypto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel β every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayβs namer to yesterdayβs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βπ Forexia GEMS π - Crypto Callsβ (@forexiacrypto), 2,198 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/forexiacrypto.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.