Video, posted without a caption
❤1

Channel
@forilyin
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
522subscribers
+4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002060792685 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @forilyin |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/forilyin |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Sept 2026, 18:19 | 522 | -1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 13:28 | 523 | +3 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 03:58 | 520 | -3 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 18:18 | 523 | +5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:17 | 518 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:03 | 518 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
84 reactions across 17 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5197683831510955485 | 27 | 32.1% | |
| custom 5204470227730983023 | 7 | 8.33% | |
| custom 5395314556908109191 | 6 | 7.14% | |
| custom 5452162241526792441 | 6 | 7.14% | |
| 🤣 | 6 | 7.14% | |
| custom 5204037952157543909 | 5 | 5.95% | |
| custom 5204373582376890440 | 5 | 5.95% | |
| custom 5213164263740305210 | 4 | 4.76% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 4.76% | |
| custom 5192711376073688729 | 3 | 3.57% | |
| custom 5217780687863574169 | 3 | 3.57% | |
| 🙈 | 3 | 3.57% | |
| custom 5427041630647513487 | 2 | 2.38% | |
| custom 5235441773773353598 | 1 | 1.19% | |
| custom 5341563633904151229 | 1 | 1.19% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 1.19% |
Custom emoji. 12 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 84 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Video, posted without a caption
❤1
🅰️е баян, а классика!
🅰️аже в аниме есть Чувство Ранга 😁 А ежели у персанажа сего нет, значит, он демон 😨 🏳️🌈🏳️⚧️🇦🇫🇦🇽🇦🇱🇩🇿🇦🇸🇦🇩 За Ильина! ДумОйте. Подписаться.
custom 51976838315109554852
А вот и прямое вранье подъехало. Достаточно взять и почитать ту же декларацию суверенитета РСФСР. Там декларируются три вещи: - Приоритет законов РСФСР над законами СССР (т.е. ни один принятый Верховным советом СССР закон не вступает в РСФСР в законную силу без ратификации местным советом) - Полнота государственной власти в РСФСР, кроме полномочий, добровольно переданных союзному центру - Разделение властей в РСФСР…
👍4custom 52044702277309830231custom 54521622415267924411
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 52177806878635741692custom 52044702277309830231
🅰️ Ельцин и Ко тут не причём! 😎 Это всё большевики конфедерацию тут понастроили, это не Горбачёв придумал референдум о сохранении СССР и попутно его превращении по сути в СНГ, нет, это всё сделали лично Ленин, Сталин, Хрущёв и Брежнев. Вот же гады, а, заложили бомбы, а они рвутся и наше Деловое Отечество страдает 😭
custom 53953145569081091916custom 51927113760736887291custom 52044702277309830231
🅰️стати в этом же посте, что характерно, правый историк Right History хвалит ту ельцинскую конституцию, которую навязали либералы (или даже «либералы»?) в 1993 после того как они убили и спокойно пошли спать и есть. Ссылалась ли Новодворская на жаб из «Дюймовочки»? У историков нет ответа.
🙈3custom 51976838315109554851custom 52044702277309830231
Действительно
custom 51976838315109554853
Господа, характерный пример наглой и мерзкой красно-коричневой ложи и манипуляции, будто бы Беловежские соглашения что-то там "отрезали" Во-первых, при распаде Советского Союза Россия не потеряла никаких территорий, каждый желающий может это проверить, посмотрев на границы РСФСР на начало 1991 года, и на начало 1992 года Во-вторых, Беловежские соглашения это не какое-то "ключевое политическое событие", это лишь юр…
custom 52044702277309830233🤣2custom 51927113760736887292
🅰️асонской?
custom 54521622415267924413custom 52040379521575439091
🅰️апомним несведущим, что Дугин в 90-е являлся идеологом запрещённой НБП
custom 52040379521575439094custom 52043735823768904401custom 53415636339041512291
Я спросил недавно у ИИ, почему мы, русские патриоты, проиграли в 90-е, либералам и западной агентуре битву за власть? Ведь народ же был на нашей стороне…. А в РФ победили русофобы. ИИ ответил: либералы, будучи меньшинством, выиграли битву за символическое пространство. Они навязали образ того, что они выиграли. Они захватили управление символами. И заставили русское большинство служить русофобскому меньшинству. Это о…
custom 52043735823768904403custom 54521622415267924412custom 52177806878635741691
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @forilyin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Студенты Zа Ильина” (@forilyin), 522 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/forilyin.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.